Pointers in Recursion: Exploring the Tropics

Author Paulin Jacobé de Naurois



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.FSCD.2019.29.pdf
  • Filesize: 487 kB
  • 18 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Paulin Jacobé de Naurois
  • CNRS, Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, LIPN, UMR 7030, F-93430 Villetaneuse, France

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the anonymous referees for their insightful and useful feedback.

Cite AsGet BibTex

Paulin Jacobé de Naurois. Pointers in Recursion: Exploring the Tropics. In 4th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 131, pp. 29:1-29:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2019.29

Abstract

We translate the usual class of partial/primitive recursive functions to a pointer recursion framework, accessing actual input values via a pointer reading unit-cost function. These pointer recursive functions classes are proven equivalent to the usual partial/primitive recursive functions. Complexity-wise, this framework captures in a streamlined way most of the relevant sub-polynomial classes. Pointer recursion with the safe/normal tiering discipline of Bellantoni and Cook corresponds to polylogtime computation. We introduce a new, non-size increasing tiering discipline, called tropical tiering. Tropical tiering and pointer recursion, used with some of the most common recursion schemes, capture the classes logspace, logspace/polylogtime, ptime, and NC. Finally, in a fashion reminiscent of the safe recursive functions, tropical tiering is expressed directly in the syntax of the function algebras, yielding the tropical recursive function algebras.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Software and its engineering → Recursion
  • Theory of computation → Complexity theory and logic
  • Theory of computation → Complexity classes
Keywords
  • Implicit Complexity
  • Recursion Theory

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Bill Allen. Arithmetizing Uniform NC. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic, 53(1):1-50, 1991. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-0072(91)90057-S.
  2. S. Bellantoni. Predicative Recursion and Computational Complexity. PhD thesis, University of Toronto, 1992. Google Scholar
  3. Stephen Bellantoni and Stephen A. Cook. A New Recursion-Theoretic Characterization of the Polytime Functions. Computational Complexity, 2:97-110, 1992. Google Scholar
  4. Stephen A. Bloch. Function-Algebraic Characterizations of Log and Polylog Parallel Time. Computational Complexity, 4:175-205, 1994. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01202288.
  5. Guillaume Bonfante, Reinhard Kahle, Jean-Yves Marion, and Isabel Oitavem. Two function algebras defining functions in NC^k boolean circuits. Inf. Comput., 248:82-103, 2016. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2015.12.009.
  6. Ashok K. Chandra, Dexter Kozen, and Larry J. Stockmeyer. Alternation. J. ACM, 28(1):114-133, 1981. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/322234.322243.
  7. P. Clote. Sequential, machine-independent characterizations of the parallel complexity classes ALOGTIME, AC^k, NC^k and NC. Feasible Mathematics, Birkhaüser, 49-69, 1989. Google Scholar
  8. A. Cobham. The intrinsic computational difficulty of functions. In Y. Bar-Hillel, editor, Proceedings of the International Conference on Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, pages 24-30. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1962. Google Scholar
  9. Martin Hofmann. Linear types and non-size-increasing polynomial time computation. Inf. Comput., 183(1):57-85, 2003. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0890-5401(03)00009-9.
  10. Martin Hofmann and Ulrich Schöpp. Pure pointer programs with iteration. ACM Trans. Comput. Log., 11(4):26:1-26:23, 2010. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1805950.1805956.
  11. Satoru Kuroda. Recursion Schemata for Slowly Growing Depth Circuit Classes. Computational Complexity, 13(1-2):69-89, 2004. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00037-004-0184-4.
  12. Daniel Leivant. A Foundational Delineation of Computational Feasiblity. In Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS '91), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, July 15-18, 1991, pages 2-11. IEEE Computer Society, 1991. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LICS.1991.151625.
  13. Daniel Leivant and Jean-Yves Marion. Ramified Recurrence and Computational Complexity II: Substitution and Poly-Space. In Leszek Pacholski and Jerzy Tiuryn, editors, CSL, volume 933 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 486-500. Springer, 1994. Google Scholar
  14. Daniel Leivant and Jean-Yves Marion. A characterization of alternating log time by ramified recurrence. Theor. Comput. Sci., 236(1-2):193-208, 2000. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3975(99)00209-1.
  15. Daniel Leivant and Jean-Yves Marion. Ramified Recurrence and Computational Complexity IV : Predicative Functionals and Poly-Space. Information and Computation, page 12 p, 2000. to appear. Article dans revue scientifique avec comité de lecture. URL: https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00099077.
  16. J. C. Lind. Computing in logarithmic space. Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1974. Google Scholar
  17. Peter Møller Neergaard. A Functional Language for Logarithmic Space. In Wei-Ngan Chin, editor, Programming Languages and Systems: Second Asian Symposium, APLAS 2004, Taipei, Taiwan, November 4-6, 2004. Proceedings, volume 3302 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 311-326. Springer, 2004. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30477-7_21.
  18. Walter L. Ruzzo. On Uniform Circuit Complexity. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 22(3):365-383, 1981. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0000(81)90038-6.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail