Document Open Access Logo

How Do People Describe Locations During a Natural Disaster: An Analysis of Tweets from Hurricane Harvey

Authors Yingjie Hu , Jimin Wang

PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.GIScience.2021.I.6.pdf
  • Filesize: 4.71 MB
  • 16 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Yingjie Hu
  • GeoAI Lab, Department of Geography, University at Buffalo, NY, USA
Jimin Wang
  • GeoAI Lab, Department of Geography, University at Buffalo, NY, USA

Cite AsGet BibTex

Yingjie Hu and Jimin Wang. How Do People Describe Locations During a Natural Disaster: An Analysis of Tweets from Hurricane Harvey. In 11th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2021) - Part I. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 177, pp. 6:1-6:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.GIScience.2021.I.6

Abstract

Social media platforms, such as Twitter, have been increasingly used by people during natural disasters to share information and request for help. Hurricane Harvey was a category 4 hurricane that devastated Houston, Texas, USA in August 2017 and caused catastrophic flooding in the Houston metropolitan area. Hurricane Harvey also witnessed the widespread use of social media by the general public in response to this major disaster, and geographic locations are key information pieces described in many of the social media messages. A geoparsing system, or a geoparser, can be utilized to automatically extract and locate the described locations, which can help first responders reach the people in need. While a number of geoparsers have already been developed, it is unclear how effective they are in recognizing and geo-locating the locations described by people during natural disasters. To fill this gap, this work seeks to understand how people describe locations during a natural disaster by analyzing a sample of tweets posted during Hurricane Harvey. We then identify the limitations of existing geoparsers in processing these tweets, and discuss possible approaches to overcoming these limitations.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Information systems → Content analysis and feature selection
  • Information systems → Retrieval effectiveness
Keywords
  • Geoparsing
  • geographic informational retrieval
  • social media
  • tweet analysis
  • disaster response

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
    0
    Metadata Views

Supplementary Materials

References

  1. Beatrice Alex, Kate Byrne, Claire Grover, and Richard Tobin. Adapting the Edinburgh geoparser for historical georeferencing. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 9(1):15-35, 2015. Google Scholar
  2. Einat Amitay, Nadav Har'El, Ron Sivan, and Aya Soffer. Web-a-where: geotagging web content. In Proceedings of the 27th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 273-280, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google Scholar
  3. Zahra Ashktorab, Christopher Brown, Manojit Nandi, and Aron Culotta. Tweedr: Mining twitter to inform disaster response. In ISCRAM, 2014. Google Scholar
  4. Andrew Crooks, Arie Croitoru, Anthony Stefanidis, and Jacek Radzikowski. # earthquake: Twitter as a distributed sensor system. Transactions in GIS, 17(1):124-147, 2013. Google Scholar
  5. Joao Porto De Albuquerque, Benjamin Herfort, Alexander Brenning, and Alexander Zipf. A geographic approach for combining social media and authoritative data towards identifying useful information for disaster management. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29(4):667-689, 2015. Google Scholar
  6. Bertrand De Longueville, Robin S Smith, and Gianluca Luraschi. "OMG, from here, I can see the flames!" a use case of mining location based social networks to acquire spatio-temporal data on forest fires. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Workshop on Location Based Social Networks, pages 73-80, 2009. Google Scholar
  7. Grant DeLozier, Jason Baldridge, and Loretta London. Gazetteer-independent toponym resolution using geographic word profiles. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 2382-2388, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2015. AAAI Press. Google Scholar
  8. Nuno Freire, José Borbinha, Pável Calado, and Bruno Martins. A metadata geoparsing system for place name recognition and resolution in metadata records. In Proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM/IEEE joint conference on Digital libraries, pages 339-348, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google Scholar
  9. Judith Gelernter and Shilpa Balaji. An algorithm for local geoparsing of microtext. GeoInformatica, 17(4):635-667, 2013. Google Scholar
  10. Judith Gelernter and Nikolai Mushegian. Geo-parsing messages from microtext. Transactions in GIS, 15(6):753-773, 2011. Google Scholar
  11. Milan Gritta, Mohammad Taher Pilehvar, and Nigel Collier. Which melbourne? augmenting geocoding with maps. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), volume 1, pages 1285-1296, 2018. Google Scholar
  12. Milan Gritta, Mohammad Taher Pilehvar, Nut Limsopatham, and Nigel Collier. What’s missing in geographical parsing? Language Resources and Evaluation, 52(2):603-623, 2018. Google Scholar
  13. Aditi Gupta, Hemank Lamba, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, and Anupam Joshi. Faking sandy: characterizing and identifying fake images on twitter during hurricane sandy. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on World Wide Web, pages 729-736, 2013. Google Scholar
  14. Qunying Huang and Yu Xiao. Geographic situational awareness: mining tweets for disaster preparedness, emergency response, impact, and recovery. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(3):1549-1568, 2015. Google Scholar
  15. Muhammad Imran, Carlos Castillo, Ji Lucas, Patrick Meier, and Sarah Vieweg. AIDR: Artificial intelligence for disaster response. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 159-162, 2014. Google Scholar
  16. Muhammad Imran, Shady Elbassuoni, Carlos Castillo, Fernando Diaz, and Patrick Meier. Extracting information nuggets from disaster-related messages in social media. In ISCRAM, 2013. Google Scholar
  17. Christopher B. Jones and Ross S. Purves. Geographical information retrieval. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(3):219-228, 2008. Google Scholar
  18. Morteza Karimzadeh. Performance evaluation measures for toponym resolution. In Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, page 8, New York, NY, USA, 2016. ACM. Google Scholar
  19. Morteza Karimzadeh, Wenyi Huang, Siddhartha Banerjee, Jan Oliver Wallgrün, Frank Hardisty, Scott Pezanowski, Prasenjit Mitra, and Alan M MacEachren. Geotxt: a web api to leverage place references in text. In Proceedings of the 7th workshop on geographic information retrieval, pages 72-73, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google Scholar
  20. Morteza Karimzadeh, Scott Pezanowski, Alan M MacEachren, and Jan O Wallgrün. Geotxt: A scalable geoparsing system for unstructured text geolocation. Transactions in GIS, 23(1):118-136, 2019. Google Scholar
  21. Yury Kryvasheyeu, Haohui Chen, Nick Obradovich, Esteban Moro, Pascal Van Hentenryck, James Fowler, and Manuel Cebrian. Rapid assessment of disaster damage using social media activity. Science advances, 2(3):e1500779, 2016. Google Scholar
  22. Jing Li, Keri K Stephens, Yaguang Zhu, and Dhiraj Murthy. Using social media to call for help in Hurricane Harvey: Bonding emotion, culture, and community relationships. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 38:101212, 2019. Google Scholar
  23. Zhenlong Li, Cuizhen Wang, Christopher T Emrich, and Diansheng Guo. A novel approach to leveraging social media for rapid flood mapping: a case study of the 2015 south carolina floods. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 45(2):97-110, 2018. Google Scholar
  24. Fei Liu, Maria Vasardani, and Timothy Baldwin. Automatic identification of locative expressions from social media text: A comparative analysis. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Location and the Web, pages 9-16, 2014. Google Scholar
  25. Alan M MacEachren, Anuj Jaiswal, Anthony C Robinson, Scott Pezanowski, Alexander Savelyev, Prasenjit Mitra, Xiao Zhang, and Justine Blanford. Senseplace2: Geotwitter analytics support for situational awareness. In Visual analytics science and technology (VAST), 2011 IEEE conference on, pages 181-190. IEEE, 2011. Google Scholar
  26. Christopher Manning, Mihai Surdeanu, John Bauer, Jenny Finkel, Steven Bethard, and David McClosky. The stanford corenlp natural language processing toolkit. In Proceedings of 52nd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: system demonstrations, pages 55-60, 2014. Google Scholar
  27. Stuart E Middleton, Lee Middleton, and Stefano Modafferi. Real-time crisis mapping of natural disasters using social media. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 29(2):9-17, 2013. Google Scholar
  28. Volodymyr V Mihunov, Nina SN Lam, Lei Zou, Zheye Wang, and Kejin Wang. Use of twitter in disaster rescue: lessons learned from Hurricane Harvey. International Journal of Digital Earth, pages 1-13, 2020. Google Scholar
  29. Dhiraj Murthy and Scott A Longwell. Twitter and disasters: The uses of twitter during the 2010 pakistan floods. Information, Communication & Society, 16(6):837-855, 2013. Google Scholar
  30. Nastaran Pourebrahim, Selima Sultana, John Edwards, Amanda Gochanour, and Somya Mohanty. Understanding communication dynamics on twitter during natural disasters: A case study of hurricane sandy. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 37:101176, 2019. Google Scholar
  31. Ross S Purves, Paul Clough, Christopher B Jones, Mark H Hall, Vanessa Murdock, et al. Geographic information retrieval: Progress and challenges in spatial search of text. Foundations and Trendsregistered in Information Retrieval, 12(2-3):164-318, 2018. Google Scholar
  32. J Rexiline Ragini, PM Rubesh Anand, and Vidhyacharan Bhaskar. Big data analytics for disaster response and recovery through sentiment analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 42:13-24, 2018. Google Scholar
  33. Maya Rhodan. Hurricane Harvey: The U.S.’s first social media storm. Time Magazine, 2017. URL: https://time.com/4921961/hurricane-harvey-twitter-facebook-social-/.
  34. Deepa Seetharaman and Georgia Wells. Hurricane Harvey victims turn to social media for assistance. The Wall Street Journal, 2017. URL: https://www.wsj.com/articles/hurricane-harvey-victims-turn-to-social-media-for-assistance-1503999001.
  35. Lauren Silverman. Facebook, twitter replace 911 calls for stranded in houston. National Public Radio, 2017. URL: https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2017/08/28/546831780/texas-police-and-residents-turn-to-social-media-to-communicate-amid-harvey.
  36. Luke Sloan, Jeffrey Morgan, William Housley, Matthew Williams, Adam Edwards, Pete Burnap, and Omer Rana. Knowing the tweeters: Deriving sociologically relevant demographics from twitter. Sociological research online, 18(3):1-11, 2013. Google Scholar
  37. Erik F Tjong Kim Sang and Fien De Meulder. Introduction to the CoNLL-2003 shared task: Language-independent named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the seventh conference on Natural language learning at HLT-NAACL 2003-Volume 4, pages 142-147. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2003. Google Scholar
  38. Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380):1146-1151, 2018. Google Scholar
  39. Jan Oliver Wallgrün, Morteza Karimzadeh, Alan M. MacEachren, and Scott Pezanowski. Geocorpora: building a corpus to test and train microblog geoparsers. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 32(1):1-29, 2018. Google Scholar
  40. Jimin Wang and Yingjie Hu. Enhancing spatial and textual analysis with eupeg: An extensible and unified platform for evaluating geoparsers. Transactions in GIS, 23(6):1393-1419, 2019. Google Scholar
  41. Ruo-Qian Wang, Huina Mao, Yuan Wang, Chris Rae, and Wesley Shaw. Hyper-resolution monitoring of urban flooding with social media and crowdsourcing data. Computers & Geosciences, 111:139-147, 2018. Google Scholar
  42. Zheye Wang, Xinyue Ye, and Ming-Hsiang Tsou. Spatial, temporal, and content analysis of twitter for wildfire hazards. Natural Hazards, 83(1):523-540, 2016. Google Scholar
  43. Manzhu Yu, Qunying Huang, Han Qin, Chris Scheele, and Chaowei Yang. Deep learning for real-time social media text classification for situation awareness-using Hurricanes Sandy, Harvey, and Irma as case studies. International Journal of Digital Earth, pages 1-18, 2019. Google Scholar
  44. Wei Zhang, Gabriele Villarini, Gabriel A Vecchi, and James A Smith. Urbanization exacerbated the rainfall and flooding caused by Hurricane Harvey in Houston. Nature, 563(7731):384-388, 2018. Google Scholar
  45. Lei Zou, Nina SN Lam, Heng Cai, and Yi Qiang. Mining twitter data for improved understanding of disaster resilience. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(5):1422-1441, 2018. Google Scholar
  46. Lei Zou, Nina SN Lam, Shayan Shams, Heng Cai, Michelle A Meyer, Seungwon Yang, Kisung Lee, Seung-Jong Park, and Margaret A Reams. Social and geographical disparities in twitter use during Hurricane Harvey. International Journal of Digital Earth, 12(11):1300-1318, 2019. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact