Error Resilient Space Partitioning (Invited Talk)

Authors Orr Dunkelman, Zeev Geyzel, Chaya Keller, Nathan Keller, Eyal Ronen, Adi Shamir, Ran J. Tessler



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.4.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.74 MB
  • 22 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Orr Dunkelman
  • Computer Science Department, University of Haifa, Israel
Zeev Geyzel
  • Mobileye, an Intel company, Jerusalem, Israel
Chaya Keller
  • Department of Computer Science, Ariel University, Israel
Nathan Keller
  • Department of Mathematics, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Eyal Ronen
  • School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Israel
Adi Shamir
  • Department of Computer Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Ran J. Tessler
  • Department of Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel

Acknowledgements

We thank Stephen D. Miller for inspiring discussions on sphere packing.

Cite AsGet BibTex

Orr Dunkelman, Zeev Geyzel, Chaya Keller, Nathan Keller, Eyal Ronen, Adi Shamir, and Ran J. Tessler. Error Resilient Space Partitioning (Invited Talk). In 48th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 198, pp. 4:1-4:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.4

Abstract

In this paper we consider a new type of space partitioning which bridges the gap between continuous and discrete spaces in an error resilient way. It is motivated by the problem of rounding noisy measurements from some continuous space such as ℝ^d to a discrete subset of representative values, in which each tile in the partition is defined as the preimage of one of the output points. Standard rounding schemes seem to be inherently discontinuous across tile boundaries, but in this paper we show how to make it perfectly consistent (with error resilience ε) by guaranteeing that any pair of consecutive measurements X₁ and X₂ whose L₂ distance is bounded by ε will be rounded to the same nearby representative point in the discrete output space. We achieve this resilience by allowing a few bits of information about the first measurement X₁ to be unidirectionally communicated to and used by the rounding process of the second measurement X₂. Minimizing this revealed information can be particularly important in privacy-sensitive applications such as COVID-19 contact tracing, in which we want to find out all the cases in which two persons were at roughly the same place at roughly the same time, by comparing cryptographically hashed versions of their itineraries in an error resilient way. The main problem we study in this paper is characterizing the achievable tradeoffs between the amount of information provided and the error resilience for various dimensions. We analyze the problem by considering the possible colored tilings of the space with k available colors, and use the color of the tile in which X₁ resides as the side information. We obtain our upper and lower bounds with a variety of techniques including isoperimetric inequalities, the Brunn-Minkowski theorem, sphere packing bounds, Sperner’s lemma, and Čech cohomology. In particular, we show that when X_i ∈ ℝ^d, communicating log₂(d+1) bits of information is both sufficient and necessary (in the worst case) to achieve positive resilience, and when d=3 we obtain a tight upper and lower asymptotic bound of (0.561 …)k^{1/3} on the achievable error resilience when we provide log₂(k) bits of information about X₁’s color.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Randomness, geometry and discrete structures
  • Theory of computation → Computational geometry
  • Theory of computation → Error-correcting codes
Keywords
  • space partition
  • high-dimensional rounding
  • error resilience
  • sphere packing
  • Sperner’s lemma
  • Brunn-Minkowski theorem
  • Čech cohomology

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Erdem Alkim, Léo Ducas, Thomas Pöppelmann, and Peter Schwabe. Post-quantum Key Exchange - A New Hope. In 25th USENIX Security Symposium, USENIX Security 16, Austin, TX, USA, August 10-12, 2016, pages 327-343, 2016. URL: https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity16/technical-sessions/presentation/alkim.
  2. Michel L. Balinksi. How should data be rounded? In Lecture Notes - Monograph Series, Vol. 28: Distributions with Fixed Marginals and Related Topics, pages 33-44. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 1996. Google Scholar
  3. R. B. Bapat. Sperner’s lemma with multiple labels. In Modeling, Computation and Optimization, Chapter 16, pages 257-262. World Scientific, 2009. Google Scholar
  4. Raoul Bott and Loring W. Tu. Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology. Springer, 1982. Google Scholar
  5. Herbert Busemann. Convex surfaces. Interscience publishers, 1958. Google Scholar
  6. Henry Cohn, Abhinav Kumar, Stephen D. Miller, Danylo Radchenko, and Maryna Viazovska. The sphere packing problem in dimension 24. Ann. of Math., 185:1017-1033, 2017. Google Scholar
  7. Henry Cohn and Yufei Zhao. Sphere packing bounds via spherical codes. Duke Mathematical Journal, 163(10):1965-2002, 2014. Google Scholar
  8. John H. Conway and Neil J. A. Sloane. What are all the best sphere packings in low dimensions? Discrete Comput. Geom., 13:383-403, 1995. Google Scholar
  9. John H. Conway and Neil J. A. Sloane. Sphere packing, lattices and groups (3rd edition). Springer, 2013. Google Scholar
  10. Lawrence Cox and Lawrence Ernst. Controlled rounding. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 20(4):423-432, 1982. Google Scholar
  11. Mark de Berg, Otfried Cheong, Marc van Kreveld, and Mark Overmars. Computational Geometry (3rd edition). Springer, 2008. Google Scholar
  12. Yevgeniy Dodis, Rafail Ostrovsky, Leonid Reyzin, and Adam D. Smith. Fuzzy extractors: How to generate strong keys from biometrics and other noisy data. SIAM J. Comput., 38(1):97-139, 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/060651380.
  13. Orr Dunkelman, Zeev Geyzel, Chaya Keller, Nathan Keller, Eyal Ronen, Adi Shamir, and Ran J. Tessler. Error resilient space partitioning (full version). CoRR, 2020. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.03675.
  14. Benjamin Fuller, Leonid Reyzin, and Adam D. Smith. When are fuzzy extractors possible? IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 66(8):5282-5298, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2020.2984751.
  15. Jacob E. Goodman, Joseph O'Rourke, and Csaba D. Tóth. Computational Geometry (3rd edition). CRC Press, 2017. Google Scholar
  16. Robert M. Gray. Vector Quantization. IEEE ASSP, 1(2):4-29, 1984. Google Scholar
  17. Thomas Hales, Mark Adams, and et al. A formal proof of the kepler conjecture. Forum of Mathematics, Pi, 5:e2, 2017. Google Scholar
  18. Thomas C. Hales. A proof of the Kepler conjecture. Ann. of Math., 162:1065-1185, 2005. Google Scholar
  19. Piotr Indyk, Rajeev Motwani, Prabhakar Raghavan, and Santosh S. Vempala. Locality-preserving hashing in multidimensional spaces. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, El Paso, Texas, USA, May 4-6, 1997, pages 618-625, 1997. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/258533.258656.
  20. Ari Juels and Martin Wattenberg. A fuzzy commitment scheme. In CCS '99, Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Singapore, November 1-4, 1999, pages 28-36, 1999. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/319709.319714.
  21. G. A. Kabatyanskii and V. I. Levenshtein. Bounds for packings on a sphere and in space (Russian). Problemy Peredaci Informacii, 14:3-25, 1978. English translation in Prob. Inform. Transmission 14 (1978), pp. 1–-17. Google Scholar
  22. Guy Kindler, Ryan O'Donnell, Anup Rao, and Avi Wigderson. Spherical cubes and rounding in high dimensions. In 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2008, October 25-28, 2008, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pages 189-198, 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2008.50.
  23. Guy Kindler, Anup Rao, Ryan O'Donnell, and Avi Wigderson. Spherical cubes: optimal foams from computational hardness amplification. Commun. ACM, 55(10):90-97, 2012. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2347736.2347757.
  24. E. Sperner. Neuer beweis für die invarianz der dimensionszahl und des gebietes (German). Abh. Math. Seminar Univ. Hamburg, 6:265-272, 1928. Google Scholar
  25. Maryna S. Viazovska. The sphere packing problem in dimension 8. Ann. of Math., 185:991-1015, 2017. Google Scholar
  26. Leon Willenborg and Ton de Waal. Elements of Statistical Disclosure Control, volume 155 of Lecture Notes in Statistics. Springer, 2001. Google Scholar
  27. Günter M. Ziegler. Lectures on Polytopes. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, 1995. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail