Document Open Access Logo

Stackelberg-Pareto Synthesis

Authors Véronique Bruyère, Jean-François Raskin, Clément Tamines

PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.CONCUR.2021.27.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.71 MB
  • 17 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Véronique Bruyère
  • Université de Mons (UMONS), Mons, Belgium
Jean-François Raskin
  • Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
Clément Tamines
  • Université de Mons (UMONS), Mons, Belgium

Funding

This work is partially supported by the PDR project Subgame perfection in graph games (F.R.S.-FNRS), the ARC project Non-Zero Sum Game Graphs: Applications to Reactive Synthesis and Beyond (Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles), the EOS project Verifying Learning Artificial Intelligence Systems (F.R.S.-FNRS and FWO), and the COST Action 16228 GAMENET (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).

Cite AsGet BibTex

Véronique Bruyère, Jean-François Raskin, and Clément Tamines. Stackelberg-Pareto Synthesis. In 32nd International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 203, pp. 27:1-27:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2021.27

Abstract

In this paper, we study the framework of two-player Stackelberg games played on graphs in which Player 0 announces a strategy and Player 1 responds rationally with a strategy that is an optimal response. While it is usually assumed that Player 1 has a single objective, we consider here the new setting where he has several. In this context, after responding with his strategy, Player 1 gets a payoff in the form of a vector of Booleans corresponding to his satisfied objectives. Rationality of Player 1 is encoded by the fact that his response must produce a Pareto-optimal payoff given the strategy of Player 0. We study the Stackelberg-Pareto Synthesis problem which asks whether Player 0 can announce a strategy which satisfies his objective, whatever the rational response of Player 1. For games in which objectives are either all parity or all reachability objectives, we show that this problem is fixed-parameter tractable and NEXPTIME-complete. This problem is already NP-complete in the simple case of reachability objectives and graphs that are trees.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Software and its engineering → Formal methods
  • Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • Theory of computation → Solution concepts in game theory
Keywords
  • Stackelberg non-zero sum games played on graphs
  • synthesis
  • parity objectives

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
    0
    Metadata Views

Related Versions

References

  1. Mrudula Balachander, Shibashis Guha, and Jean-François Raskin. Fragility and robustness in mean-payoff adversarial Stackelberg games. CoRR, abs/2007.07209, 2020. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.07209.
  2. Dietmar Berwanger. Admissibility in infinite games. In Wolfgang Thomas and Pascal Weil, editors, STACS 2007, 24th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, Aachen, Germany, February 22-24, 2007, Proceedings, volume 4393 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 188-199. Springer, 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70918-3_17.
  3. Romain Brenguier, Lorenzo Clemente, Paul Hunter, Guillermo A. Pérez, Mickael Randour, Jean-François Raskin, Ocan Sankur, and Mathieu Sassolas. Non-zero sum games for reactive synthesis. In Adrian-Horia Dediu, Jan Janousek, Carlos Martín-Vide, and Bianca Truthe, editors, Language and Automata Theory and Applications - 10th International Conference, LATA 2016, Prague, Czech Republic, March 14-18, 2016, Proceedings, volume 9618 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 3-23. Springer, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30000-9_1.
  4. Romain Brenguier, Jean-François Raskin, and Ocan Sankur. Assume-admissible synthesis. In Luca Aceto and David de Frutos-Escrig, editors, 26th International Conference on Concurrency Theory, CONCUR 2015, Madrid, Spain, September 1.4, 2015, volume 42 of LIPIcs, pages 100-113. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2015.100.
  5. Léonard Brice, Jean-François Raskin, and Marie van den Bogaard. Subgame-perfect equilibria in mean-payoff games. CoRR, abs/2101.10685, 2021. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.10685.
  6. Thomas Brihaye, Véronique Bruyère, Aline Goeminne, Jean-François Raskin, and Marie van den Bogaard. The complexity of subgame perfect equilibria in quantitative reachability games. Log. Methods Comput. Sci., 16(4), 2020. URL: https://lmcs.episciences.org/6883.
  7. Véronique Bruyère. Computer aided synthesis: A game-theoretic approach. In Émilie Charlier, Julien Leroy, and Michel Rigo, editors, Developments in Language Theory - 21st International Conference, DLT 2017, Liège, Belgium, August 7-11, 2017, Proceedings, volume 10396 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 3-35. Springer, 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62809-7_1.
  8. Véronique Bruyère, Quentin Hautem, and Jean-François Raskin. Parameterized complexity of games with monotonically ordered omega-regular objectives. In Sven Schewe and Lijun Zhang, editors, 29th International Conference on Concurrency Theory, CONCUR 2018, September 4-7, 2018, Beijing, China, volume 118 of LIPIcs, pages 29:1-29:16. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2018.29.
  9. Véronique Bruyère, Jean-François Raskin, and Clément Tamines. Stackelberg-Pareto synthesis (full version). CoRR, abs/2102.08925, 2021. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.08925.
  10. Krishnendu Chatterjee and Monika Henzinger. Efficient and dynamic algorithms for alternating Büchi games and maximal end-component decomposition. J. ACM, 61(3):15:1-15:40, 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2597631.
  11. Krishnendu Chatterjee and Thomas A. Henzinger. Assume-guarantee synthesis. In Orna Grumberg and Michael Huth, editors, Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, 13th International Conference, TACAS 2007, Held as Part of the Joint European Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2007 Braga, Portugal, March 24 - April 1, 2007, Proceedings, volume 4424 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 261-275. Springer, 2007. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71209-1_21.
  12. Krishnendu Chatterjee, Thomas A. Henzinger, and Marcin Jurdzinski. Games with secure equilibria. Theor. Comput. Sci., 365(1-2):67-82, 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2006.07.032.
  13. Rodica Condurache, Emmanuel Filiot, Raffaella Gentilini, and Jean-François Raskin. The complexity of rational synthesis. In Ioannis Chatzigiannakis, Michael Mitzenmacher, Yuval Rabani, and Davide Sangiorgi, editors, 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2016, July 11-15, 2016, Rome, Italy, volume 55 of LIPIcs, pages 121:1-121:15. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2016.121.
  14. Bireswar Das, Patrick Scharpfenecker, and Jacobo Torán. CNF and DNF succinct graph encodings. Inf. Comput., 253:436-447, 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2016.06.009.
  15. R.G. Downey and M.R. Fellows. Parameterized Complexity. Monographs in Computer Science. Springer New York, 2012. URL: https://books.google.be/books?id=HyTjBwAAQBAJ.
  16. Emmanuel Filiot, Raffaella Gentilini, and Jean-François Raskin. The adversarial Stackelberg value in quantitative games. In Artur Czumaj, Anuj Dawar, and Emanuela Merelli, editors, 47th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2020, July 8-11, 2020, Saarbrücken, Germany (Virtual Conference), volume 168 of LIPIcs, pages 127:1-127:18. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2020.127.
  17. Dana Fisman, Orna Kupferman, and Yoad Lustig. Rational synthesis. In Javier Esparza and Rupak Majumdar, editors, Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, 16th International Conference, TACAS 2010, Held as Part of the Joint European Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2010, Paphos, Cyprus, March 20-28, 2010. Proceedings, volume 6015 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 190-204. Springer, 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12002-2_16.
  18. Erich Grädel, Wolfgang Thomas, and Thomas Wilke, editors. Automata, Logics, and Infinite Games: A Guide to Current Research [outcome of a Dagstuhl seminar, February 2001], volume 2500 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2002. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36387-4.
  19. Anshul Gupta and Sven Schewe. Quantitative verification in rational environments. In Amedeo Cesta, Carlo Combi, and François Laroussinie, editors, 21st International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning, TIME 2014, Verona, Italy, September 8-10, 2014, pages 123-131. IEEE Computer Society, 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIME.2014.9.
  20. Anshul Gupta, Sven Schewe, and Dominik Wojtczak. Making the best of limited memory in multi-player discounted sum games. In Javier Esparza and Enrico Tronci, editors, Proceedings Sixth International Symposium on Games, Automata, Logics and Formal Verification, GandALF 2015, Genoa, Italy, 21-22nd September 2015, volume 193 of EPTCS, pages 16-30, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.193.2.
  21. Julian Gutierrez, Muhammad Najib, Giuseppe Perelli, and Michael J. Wooldridge. On computational tractability for rational verification. In Sarit Kraus, editor, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2019, Macao, China, August 10-16, 2019, pages 329-335. ijcai.org, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/47.
  22. Julian Gutierrez, Muhammad Najib, Giuseppe Perelli, and Michael J. Wooldridge. Automated temporal equilibrium analysis: Verification and synthesis of multi-player games. Artif. Intell., 287:103353, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103353.
  23. Richard M. Karp. Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In Raymond E. Miller and James W. Thatcher, editors, Proceedings of a symposium on the Complexity of Computer Computations, held March 20-22, 1972, at the IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, USA, The IBM Research Symposia Series, pages 85-103. Plenum Press, New York, 1972. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2001-2_9.
  24. Orna Kupferman, Giuseppe Perelli, and Moshe Y. Vardi. Synthesis with rational environments. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 78(1):3-20, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-016-9508-8.
  25. John F. Nash. Equilibrium points in n-person games. In PNAS, volume 36, pages 48-49. National Academy of Sciences, 1950. Google Scholar
  26. Amir Pnueli and Roni Rosner. On the synthesis of a reactive module. In Conference Record of the Sixteenth Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, Austin, Texas, USA, January 11-13, 1989, pages 179-190. ACM Press, 1989. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/75277.75293.
  27. Reinhard Selten. Spieltheoretische Behandlung eines Oligopolmodells mit Nachfrageträgheit. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 121:301-324 and 667-689, 1965. Google Scholar
  28. Michael Ummels. Rational behaviour and strategy construction in infinite multiplayer games. In S. Arun-Kumar and Naveen Garg, editors, FSTTCS 2006: Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, 26th International Conference, Kolkata, India, December 13-15, 2006, Proceedings, volume 4337 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 212-223. Springer, 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/11944836_21.
  29. Michael Ummels. The complexity of Nash equilibria in infinite multiplayer games. In Roberto M. Amadio, editor, Foundations of Software Science and Computational Structures, 11th International Conference, FOSSACS 2008, Held as Part of the Joint European Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2008, Budapest, Hungary, March 29 - April 6, 2008. Proceedings, volume 4962 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 20-34. Springer, 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78499-9_3.
  30. Michael Ummels and Dominik Wojtczak. The complexity of Nash equilibria in limit-average games. In Joost-Pieter Katoen and Barbara König, editors, CONCUR 2011 - Concurrency Theory - 22nd International Conference, CONCUR 2011, Aachen, Germany, September 6-9, 2011. Proceedings, volume 6901 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 482-496. Springer, 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23217-6_32.
  31. Heinrich Freiherr von Stackelberg. Marktform und Gleichgewicht. Wien und Berlin, J. Springer, Cambridge, MA, 1937. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact