License
When quoting this document, please refer to the following
DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.04391.5
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-360
URL: https://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2005/36/
Go to the corresponding Portal

Euzenat, Jerome
Standards and Benchmarks

Evaluating ontology alignment methods

pdf-format:
04391.EuzenatJerome2.ExtAbstract.36.pdf (0.2 MB)

Abstract

Many different methods have been designed for aligning ontologies.
These methods use such different techniques that they can hardly be
compared theoretically. Hence, it is necessary to compare them on
common tests.
We present two initiatives that led to the definition and the performance of the
evaluation of ontology alignments during 2004.
We draw lessons from these two experiments and discuss future improvements.

BibTeX - Entry

@InProceedings{euzenat:DagSemProc.04391.5,
  author =	{Euzenat, Jerome},
  title =	{{Evaluating ontology alignment methods}},
  booktitle =	{Semantic Interoperability and Integration},
  pages =	{1--8},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2005},
  volume =	{4391},
  editor =	{Y. Kalfoglou and M. Schorlemmer and A. Sheth and S. Staab and M. Uschold},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2005/36},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-360},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.04391.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: evaluation , ontology alignment}
}

Keywords: evaluation , ontology alignment
Collection: 04391 - Semantic Interoperability and Integration
Issue Date: 2005
Date of publication: 23.03.2005

DROPS-Home | Fulltext Search | Imprint | Privacy Published by LZI