On the Borel Inseparability of Game Tree Languages

Authors Szczepan Hummel, Henryk Michalewski, Damian Niwinski



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.STACS.2009.1849.pdf
  • Filesize: 244 kB
  • 12 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Szczepan Hummel
Henryk Michalewski
Damian Niwinski

Cite As Get BibTex

Szczepan Hummel, Henryk Michalewski, and Damian Niwinski. On the Borel Inseparability of Game Tree Languages. In 26th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 3, pp. 565-576, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2009) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2009.1849

Abstract

The game tree languages can be viewed as an automata-theoretic counterpart of parity games on graphs. They witness the strictness of the index hierarchy of alternating tree automata, as well as the fixed-point hierarchy over binary trees.

We consider a game tree language of the first non-trivial level, where Eve can force that 0 repeats from some moment on, and its dual, where Adam can force that 1 repeats from some moment on. Both these sets (which amount to one up to an obvious renaming) are complete in the class of co-analytic sets. We show that they cannot be separated by any Borel set, hence {\em a fortiori\/} by any weakly definable set of trees.

This settles a case left open by L. Santocanale and A. Arnold, who have thoroughly investigated the separation property within the $\mu $-calculus and the automata index hierarchies. They showed that separability fails in general for non-deterministic automata of type $\Sigma^{\mu }_{n} $, starting from level $n=3$, while our result settles the missing case $n=2$.

Subject Classification

Keywords
  • Tree automata
  • Separation property
  • Borel sets
  • Parity games

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail