Tight Bounds For Distributed MST Verification

Authors Liah Kor, Amos Korman, David Peleg



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.STACS.2011.69.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.66 MB
  • 12 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Liah Kor
Amos Korman
David Peleg

Cite As Get BibTex

Liah Kor, Amos Korman, and David Peleg. Tight Bounds For Distributed MST Verification. In 28th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2011). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 9, pp. 69-80, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2011) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2011.69

Abstract

This paper establishes tight bounds for the Minimum-weight Spanning Tree (MST) verification problem in the distributed setting. Specifically, we provide an MST  verification algorithm that achieves simultaneously tilde ~O(|E|) messages and $tilde O(sqrt{n} + D) time, where |E| is the number of edges in the given graph G and D is G's diameter. On the negative side, we show that any MST verification algorithm must send Omega(|E|) messages and incur ~Omega(sqrt{n} + D) time in worst case.

Our upper bound result appears to indicate that the verification of an MST may be easier than its construction, since for MST construction, both lower bounds of Omega(|E|) messages and
Omega(sqrt{n} + D) time hold, but at the moment there is no known distributed algorithm that constructs an MST and  achieves simultaneously tilde O(|E|) messages and ´~O(sqrt{n} + D) time. Specifically, the best known time-optimal algorithm (using ~O(sqrt{n} + D) time) requires O(|E|+n^{3/2}) messages, and the best known message-optimal algorithm (using ~O(|E|) messages) requires O(n) time.
On the other hand, our lower bound results indicate that the verification of an MST is not significantly easier than its construction.

Subject Classification

Keywords
  • distributed algorithms
  • distributed verification
  • labeling schemes
  • minimum-weight spanning tree

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail