Modifying Entity Relationship Models for Collaborative Fiction Planning and its Impact on Potential Authors

Authors Alan Tapscott, Joaquim Colàs, Ayman Moghnieh, Josep Blat



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

OASIcs.CMN.2014.209.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.78 MB
  • 13 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Alan Tapscott
Joaquim Colàs
Ayman Moghnieh
Josep Blat

Cite AsGet BibTex

Alan Tapscott, Joaquim Colàs, Ayman Moghnieh, and Josep Blat. Modifying Entity Relationship Models for Collaborative Fiction Planning and its Impact on Potential Authors. In 2014 Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative. Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 41, pp. 209-221, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2014)
https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2014.209

Abstract

We propose a modified Entity Relationship (E-R) model, traditionally used for software engineering, to structure, store and share plot data. The flexibility of E-R modelling has been demonstrated by its decades of usage in a wide variety of situations. The success of the E-R model suggests that it could be useful for collaborating fiction authors, adding a certain degree of computational power to their process. We changed the E-R model syntax to better suit the story plans, switching the emphasis from generic types to instanced story entities, but preserving relationships and attributes. We conducted a small-scale basic experiment to study the impact of using our modified E-R model on authors when understanding and contributing into a pre-existing fiction story plan. The results analysis revealed that the E-R model supports authors as effectively as written text in reading comprehension, memory, and contributing. In addition, the results show that, when combined together, the written text and the E-R model help participants achieve better comprehension--always within the frame of our experiment. We discuss potential applications of these findings.
Keywords
  • storytelling
  • story planning
  • Entity Relationship Model

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Selmer Bringsjord and David Ferrucci. Artificial intelligence and literary creativity: Inside the mind of brutus, a storytelling machine. Psychology Press, 1999. Google Scholar
  2. Peter Pin-Shan Chen. The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), 1(1):9-36, 1976. Google Scholar
  3. Peter Pin-Shan Chen. English sentence structure and entity-relationship diagrams. Information Sciences, 29(2):127-149, 1983. Google Scholar
  4. Joaquim Colas, Alan Tapscott, Ayman Moghnieh, and Josep Blat. Shared narratives as a new interactive medium: Crosstale as a prototype for collaborative storytelling. International Journal On Advances in Telecommunications, 6(1 and 2):12-23, 2013. Google Scholar
  5. Steven R. Corman, B. Hunter Ball, Kimberly M. Talboom, and Gene A. Brewer. Assessing Two-Mode Semantic Network Story Representations Using a False Memory Paradigm. In Mark A. Finlayson, Bernhard Fisseni, Benedikt Löwe, and Jan Christoph Meister, editors, 2013 Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative, volume 32 of OpenAccess Series in Informatics (OASIcs), pages 53-61, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2013. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik. Google Scholar
  6. Sven Hartmann and Sebastian Link. English sentence structures and eer modeling. In Proceedings of the fourth Asia-Pacific conference on Comceptual modelling-Volume 67, pages 27-35. Australian Computer Society, Inc., 2007. Google Scholar
  7. Jos Kirps. Galaxiki, 2007. [Online; accessed 30-May-2014]. Google Scholar
  8. Manfred R. Klopprogge. Term: An approach to include time dimension in the entity-relationship model. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Entity-Relationship Approach to Information Modeling and Analysis, ER '81, pages 473-508, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, The Netherlands, 1983. North-Holland Publishing Co. Google Scholar
  9. Michael Lebowitz. Creating a story-telling universe. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, 1983. Google Scholar
  10. Wendy G Lehnert. Plot units and narrative summarization. Cognitive Science, 5(4):293-331, 1981. Google Scholar
  11. Peter Likarish and Jon Winet. Exquisite corpse 2.0: qualitative analysis of a community-based fiction project. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, pages 564-567. ACM, 2012. Google Scholar
  12. Paul Benjamin Lowry, Aaron Curtis, and Michelle René Lowry. Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice. Journal of Business Communication, 41(1):66-99, 2004. Google Scholar
  13. Richard E Mayer. Multimedia learning. Cambridge university press, 2009. Google Scholar
  14. John C Nesbit and Olusola O Adesope. Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 76(3):413-448, 2006. Google Scholar
  15. Joan Peckham and Fred Maryanski. Semantic data models. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 20(3):153-189, 1988. Google Scholar
  16. Vladimir Propp. The Morphology of the Folktale. University of Texas Press, Austin, 1968. Google Scholar
  17. Alan Tapscot, Joaquim Colàs, Ayman Moghnieh, and Josep Blat. Writing Consistent Stories based on Structured Multi-Authored Narrative Spaces. In Mark A. Finlayson, Bernhard Fisseni, Benedikt Löwe, and Jan Christoph Meister, editors, 2013 Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative, volume 32 of OpenAccess Series in Informatics (OASIcs), pages 277-292, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2013. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik. Google Scholar
  18. Wikipedia. La diligencia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 1939. [Online; accessed 30-May-2014]. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail