Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license
A major part of our knowledge about Computational Learning stems from comparisons of the learning power of different learning criteria. These comparisons inform about trade-offs between learning restrictions and, more generally, learning settings; furthermore, they inform about what restrictions can be observed without losing learning power. With this paper we propose that one main focus of future research in Computational Learning should be on a structured approach to determine the relations of different learning criteria. In particular, we propose that, for small sets of learning criteria, all pairwise relations should be determined; these relations can then be easily depicted as a map, a diagram detailing the relations. Once we have maps for many relevant sets of learning criteria, the collection of these maps is an Atlas of Computational Learning Theory, informing at a glance about the landscape of computational learning just as a geographical atlas informs about the earth. In this paper we work toward this goal by providing three example maps, one pertaining to partially set-driven learning, and two pertaining to strongly monotone learning. These maps can serve as blueprints for future maps of similar base structure.
@InProceedings{kotzing_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2016.47,
author = {K\"{o}tzing, Timo and Schirneck, Martin},
title = {{Towards an Atlas of Computational Learning Theory}},
booktitle = {33rd Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2016)},
pages = {47:1--47:13},
series = {Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
ISBN = {978-3-95977-001-9},
ISSN = {1868-8969},
year = {2016},
volume = {47},
editor = {Ollinger, Nicolas and Vollmer, Heribert},
publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
address = {Dagstuhl, Germany},
URL = {https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2016.47},
URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-57483},
doi = {10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2016.47},
annote = {Keywords: computational learning, language learning, partially set-driven learning, strongly monotone learning}
}