DagRep.6.4.80.pdf
- Filesize: 1.2 MB
- 30 pages
Document
Natural Language Argumentation: Mining, Processing, and Reasoning over Textual Arguments (Dagstuhl Seminar 16161)
Authors and all authors of the abstracts in this report
-
Part of:
Issue:
Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 6, Issue 4
Volume: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 6
Journal: Dagstuhl Reports (DagRep) - License:
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license
- Publication Date: 2016-10-12
Cite As Get BibTex
Elena Cabrio, Graeme Hirst, Serena Villata, and Adam Wyner. Natural Language Argumentation: Mining, Processing, and Reasoning over Textual Arguments (Dagstuhl Seminar 16161). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp. 80-109, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)
https://doi.org/10.4230/DagRep.6.4.80
Abstract
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 16161 "Natural Language Argumentation: Mining, Processing, and Reasoning over Textual Arguments", 17--22 April 2016. The seminar brought together leading researchers from computational linguistics, argumentation theory and cognitive psychology communities to discuss the obtained results and the future challenges of the recently born Argument Mining research area. 40 participants from 14 different countries took part in 7 sessions that included 30 talks, two tutorials, and a hands-on “unshared” task.
Subject Classification
Keywords
- Argument Mining
- Argumentation Theory
- Cognitive Science
- Computational Linguistics
Metrics
- Access Statistics
-
Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
0PDF Downloads