Coding in Undirected Graphs Is Either Very Helpful or Not Helpful at All

Authors Mark Braverman, Sumegha Garg, Ariel Schvartzman



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.ITCS.2017.18.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.8 MB
  • 18 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Mark Braverman
Sumegha Garg
Ariel Schvartzman

Cite As Get BibTex

Mark Braverman, Sumegha Garg, and Ariel Schvartzman. Coding in Undirected Graphs Is Either Very Helpful or Not Helpful at All. In 8th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 67, pp. 18:1-18:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2017.18

Abstract

While it is known that using network coding can significantly improve the throughput of directed networks, it is a notorious open problem whether coding yields any advantage over the multicommodity flow (MCF) rate in undirected networks. It was conjectured that the answer is no. In this paper we show that even a small advantage over MCF can be amplified to yield a near-maximum possible gap. 

We prove that any undirected network with k source-sink pairs that exhibits a (1+epsilon) gap between its MCF rate and its network coding rate can be used to construct a family of graphs G' whose gap is log(|G'|)^c for some constant c < 1. The resulting gap is close to the best currently known upper bound, log(|G'|), which follows from the connection between MCF and sparsest cuts. 

Our construction relies on a gap-amplifying graph tensor product that, given two graphs G1,G2 with small gaps, creates another graph G with a gap that is equal to the product of the previous two, at the cost of increasing the size of the graph. We iterate this process to obtain a gap of log(|G'|)^c from any initial gap.

Subject Classification

Keywords
  • Network coding
  • Gap Amplification
  • Multicommodity flows

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. M. Adler, N. J. A. Harvey, K. Jain, R. Kleinberg, and A. Rasala Lehman. On the capacity of information networks. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithm, SODA '06, pages 241-250, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2006. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. Google Scholar
  2. Rudolf Ahlswede, Ning Cai, S-YR Li, and Raymond W Yeung. Network information flow. IEEE Transactions on information theory, 46(4):1204-1216, 2000. Google Scholar
  3. R. K. Ahuja, T. L. Magnanti, and J. B. Orlin. Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1993. Google Scholar
  4. Anna Blasiak, Robert Kleinberg, and Eyal Lubetzky. Lexicographic products and the power of non-linear network coding. In Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on, pages 609-618. IEEE, 2011. Google Scholar
  5. C. Fragouli and E. Soljanin. Network coding applications. Found. Trends Netw., 2(2):135-269, January 2007. Google Scholar
  6. Z. Furedi, F. Lazebnik, A. Seress, V. A. Ustimenko, and A. J Woldar. Graphs of prescribed girth and bi-degree. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 64(2):228-239, 1995. Google Scholar
  7. N. J. A. Harvey, R. Kleinberg, and A. Rasala Lehman. Comparing network coding with multicommodity flow for the k-pairs communication problem, 2004. Google Scholar
  8. K. Jain, V. V. Vazirani, and G. Yuval. On the capacity of multiple unicast sessions in undirected graphs. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 14(SI):2805-2809, June 2006. Google Scholar
  9. G. Kramer and S. A. Savari. Edge-cut bounds on network coding rates. J. Netw. Syst. Manage., 14(1):49-67, March 2006. Google Scholar
  10. T. Leighton and S. Rao. Multicommodity max-flow min-cut theorems and their use in designing approximation algorithms. J. ACM, 46(6):787-832, November 1999. Google Scholar
  11. Z. Li and B. Li. Network coding in undirected networks, 2004. Google Scholar
  12. Z. Li, B. Li, D. Jiang, and L. C. Lau. On achieving optimal throughput with network coding. In INFOCOM 2005. 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, 13-17 March 2005, Miami, FL, USA, pages 2184-2194, 2005. Google Scholar
  13. M. Medard and A. Sprintson. Network Coding: Fundamentals and Applications. Academic Press. Elsevier, 2012. Google Scholar
  14. R. W. Yeung. Information theory and network coding. Springer Science &Business Media, 2008. Google Scholar
  15. R. W. Yeung, S.-Y. R. Li, N. Cai, and Z. Zhang. Network coding theory: Single sources. Commun. Inf. Theory, 2(4):241-329, September 2005. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail