On Price versus Quality

Authors Avrim Blum, Yishay Mansour



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.ITCS.2018.16.pdf
  • Filesize: 482 kB
  • 12 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Avrim Blum
Yishay Mansour

Cite AsGet BibTex

Avrim Blum and Yishay Mansour. On Price versus Quality. In 9th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 94, pp. 16:1-16:12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2018.16

Abstract

In this work we propose a model where the value of a buyer for some product (like a slice of pizza) is a combination of their personal desire for the product (how hungry they are for pizza) and the quality of the product (how good the pizza is). Sellers in this setting have a two-dimensional optimization problem of determining both the quality level at which to make their product (how expensive ingredients to use) and the price at which to sell it. We analyze optimal seller strategies as well as analogs of Walrasian equilibria in this setting. A key question we are interested in is: to what extent will the price of a good be a reliable indicator of the good's quality? One result we show is that indeed in this model, price will be a surprisingly robust signal for quality under optimal seller behavior. In particular, while the specific quality and price that a seller should choose will depend highly on the specific distribution of buyers, for optimal sellers, price and quality will be linearly related, independent of that distribution. We also show that for the case of multiple buyers and sellers, an analog of Walrasian equilibrium exists in this setting, and can be found via a natural tatonnement process. Finally, we analyze markets with a combination of "locals" (who know the quality of each good) and "tourists" (who do not) and analyze under what conditions the market will become a tourist trap, setting quality to zero while keeping prices high.
Keywords
  • Algorithmic game theory
  • pricing
  • Cobb-Douglas valuations

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Kyle Bagwell and Michael H. Riordan. High and declining prices signal product quality. The American Economic Review, 81(1):224-239, 1991. Google Scholar
  2. Gabrielle Demange, David Gale, and Marilda Sotomayor. Multi-item auctions. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4):863-872, 1986. Google Scholar
  3. Bernd Fricka and Robert Simmons. The impact of managerial quality on organizational performance: Evidence from german soccer. Managarial and Decision Economics, 29:593-600, 2008. Google Scholar
  4. Paul J. Gertler and Donald M. Waldman. Quality-adjusted cost functions and policy evaluation in the nursing home industry. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6):1232-1256, 1992. Google Scholar
  5. Faruk Gul and Ennio Stacchetti. Walrasian equilibrium with gross substitutes. Journal of Economic Theory, 87(1):95-124, 1999. Google Scholar
  6. Amna Kirmani and Akshay R. Rao. No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. Journal of Marketing, 64(2):66-79, 2000. Google Scholar
  7. Andreu Mas-Colell, Michael D. Whinston, and Jerry R. Green. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford University Press, 1995. Google Scholar
  8. N. Nisan, T. Roughgarden, E. Tardos, and V. V. Vazirani. Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2007. Google Scholar
  9. Ariely Dan Shiv Baba, Carmon Ziv. Placebo effects of marketing actions: Consumers may get what they pay for. Journal of Marketing Research, 42:383-393, 2005. Google Scholar
  10. Steven M. Shugan. Price-quality relationships. Advances in Consumer Research, 11:627-632, 1984. Google Scholar
  11. Surendra Rajiv Tridas Mukhopadhyay and Kannan Srinivasan. Information technology impact on process output and quality. Management Science, 43(12):1645-1659, 1997. Google Scholar
  12. Valarie A. Zeithaml. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3):2-22, 1988. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail