Enumeration Complexity of Conjunctive Queries with Functional Dependencies

Authors Nofar Carmeli, Markus Kröll



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.ICDT.2018.11.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.48 MB
  • 17 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Nofar Carmeli
Markus Kröll

Cite As Get BibTex

Nofar Carmeli and Markus Kröll. Enumeration Complexity of Conjunctive Queries with Functional Dependencies. In 21st International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 98, pp. 11:1-11:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2018.11

Abstract

We study the complexity of enumerating the answers of Conjunctive Queries (CQs) in the presence of Functional Dependencies (FDs). Our focus is on the ability to list output tuples with a constant delay in between, following a linear-time preprocessing. A known dichotomy classifies the acyclic self-join-free CQs into those that admit such enumeration, and those that do not. However, this classification no longer holds in the common case where the database exhibits dependencies among attributes. That is, some queries that are classified as hard are in fact tractable if dependencies are accounted for. We establish a generalization of the dichotomy to accommodate FDs; hence, our classification determines which combination of a CQ and a set of FDs admits constant-delay enumeration with a linear-time preprocessing.

In addition, we generalize a hardness result for cyclic CQs to accommodate a common type of FDs. Further conclusions of our development include a dichotomy for enumeration with linear delay, and a dichotomy for CQs with disequalities. Finally, we show that all our results apply to the known class of "cardinality dependencies" that generalize FDs (e.g., by stating an upper bound on the number of genres per movies, or friends per person).

Subject Classification

Keywords
  • Enumeration
  • Complexity
  • CQs

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Amir Abboud and Virginia Vassilevska Williams. Popular conjectures imply strong lower bounds for dynamic problems. In Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2014 IEEE 55th Annual Symposium on, pages 434-443. IEEE, 2014. Google Scholar
  2. Myrto Arapinis, Diego Figueira, and Marco Gaboardi. Sensitivity of counting queries. In 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP 2016, Rome, Italy, pages 120:1-120:13, 2016. Google Scholar
  3. Guillaume Bagan, Arnaud Durand, and Etienne Grandjean. On acyclic conjunctive queries and constant delay enumeration. In International Workshop on Computer Science Logic, pages 208-222. Springer, 2007. Google Scholar
  4. Catriel Beeri, Ronald Fagin, David Maier, and Mihalis Yannakakis. On the desirability of acyclic database schemes. J. ACM, 30(3):479-513, 1983. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2402.322389.
  5. Christoph Berkholz, Jens Keppeler, and Nicole Schweikardt. Answering conjunctive queries under updates. In Proceedings of the 36th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, PODS 2017, Chicago, IL, USA, May 14-19, 2017, pages 303-318, 2017. Google Scholar
  6. Johann Brault-Baron. De la pertinence de l’énumération: complexité en logiques propositionnelle et du premier ordre. PhD thesis, Université de Caen, 2013. Google Scholar
  7. Yang Cao, Wenfei Fan, Tianyu Wo, and Wenyuan Yu. Bounded conjunctive queries. PVLDB, 7(12):1231-1242, 2014. Google Scholar
  8. Nofar Carmeli and Markus Kröll. Enumeration complexity of conjunctive queries with functional dependencies. CoRR, abs/1712.07880, 2017. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.07880.
  9. Nadia Creignou, Markus Kröll, Reinhard Pichler, Sebastian Skritek, and Heribert Vollmer. On the complexity of hard enumeration problems. In Language and Automata Theory and Applications - 11th International Conference, LATA 2017, Umeå, Sweden, pages 183-195, 2017. Google Scholar
  10. Arnaud Durand, Nicole Schweikardt, and Luc Segoufin. Enumerating answers to first-order queries over databases of low degree. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, PODS '14, pages 121-131, 2014. Google Scholar
  11. François Le Gall. Powers of tensors and fast matrix multiplication. In Katsusuke Nabeshima, Kosaku Nagasaka, Franz Winkler, and Ágnes Szántó, editors, International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, ISSAC '14, Kobe, Japan, July 23-25, 2014, pages 296-303. ACM, 2014. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2608628.2608664.
  12. Etienne Grandjean. Sorting, linear time and the satisfiability problem. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell., 16:183-236, 1996. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02127798.
  13. Benny Kimelfeld. A dichotomy in the complexity of deletion propagation with functional dependencies. In Michael Benedikt, Markus Krötzsch, and Maurizio Lenzerini, editors, Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, PODS 2012, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, May 20-24, 2012, pages 191-202. ACM, 2012. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2213556.2213584.
  14. Christos H. Papadimitriou and Mihalis Yannakakis. On the complexity of database queries. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 58(3):407-427, 1999. Google Scholar
  15. Luc Segoufin and Alexandre Vigny. Constant delay enumeration for FO queries over databases with local bounded expansion. In 20th International Conference on Database Theory, ICDT 2017, Venice, Italy, pages 20:1-20:16, 2017. Google Scholar
  16. Yann Strozecki. Enumeration complexity and matroid decomposition. PhD thesis, Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7, 2010. Available at URL: http://www.prism.uvsq.fr/~ystr/these_strozecki.
  17. Virginia Vassilevska Williams and Ryan Williams. Subcubic equivalences between path, matrix and triangle problems. In 51th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2010, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, pages 645-654, 2010. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail