Improved Algorithms for Adaptive Compressed Sensing

Authors Vasileios Nakos, Xiaofei Shi, David P. Woodruff, Hongyang Zhang



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.ICALP.2018.90.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.56 MB
  • 14 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Vasileios Nakos
  • Harvard University, Cambridge, USA
Xiaofei Shi
  • Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA
David P. Woodruff
  • Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA
Hongyang Zhang
  • Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA

Cite As Get BibTex

Vasileios Nakos, Xiaofei Shi, David P. Woodruff, and Hongyang Zhang. Improved Algorithms for Adaptive Compressed Sensing. In 45th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 107, pp. 90:1-90:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2018.90

Abstract

In the problem of adaptive compressed sensing, one wants to estimate an approximately k-sparse vector x in R^n from m linear measurements A_1 x, A_2 x,..., A_m x, where A_i can be chosen based on the outcomes A_1 x,..., A_{i-1} x of previous measurements. The goal is to output a vector x^ for which |x-x^|_p <=C * min_{k-sparse x'} |x-x'|_q, with probability at least 2/3, where C > 0 is an approximation factor. Indyk, Price and Woodruff (FOCS'11) gave an algorithm for p=q=2 for C = 1+epsilon with O((k/epsilon) loglog (n/k)) measurements and O(log^*(k) loglog (n)) rounds of adaptivity. We first improve their bounds, obtaining a scheme with O(k * loglog (n/k) + (k/epsilon) * loglog(1/epsilon)) measurements and O(log^*(k) loglog (n)) rounds, as well as a scheme with O((k/epsilon) * loglog (n log (n/k))) measurements and an optimal O(loglog (n)) rounds. We then provide novel adaptive compressed sensing schemes with improved bounds for (p,p) for every 0 < p < 2. We show that the improvement from O(k log(n/k)) measurements to O(k log log (n/k)) measurements in the adaptive setting can persist with a better epsilon-dependence for other values of p and q. For example, when (p,q) = (1,1), we obtain O(k/sqrt{epsilon} * log log n log^3 (1/epsilon)) measurements. We obtain nearly matching lower bounds, showing our algorithms are close to optimal. Along the way, we also obtain the first nearly-optimal bounds for (p,p) schemes for every 0 < p < 2 even in the non-adaptive setting.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Design and analysis of algorithms
Keywords
  • Compressed Sensing
  • Adaptivity
  • High-Dimensional Vectors

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Akram Aldroubi, Haichao Wang, and Kourosh Zarringhalam. Sequential adaptive compressed sampling via Huffman codes. arXiv preprint arXiv:0810.4916, 2008. Google Scholar
  2. Pranjal Awasthi, Maria-Florina Balcan, Nika Haghtalab, and Hongyang Zhang. Learning and 1-bit compressed sensing under asymmetric noise. In Annual Conference on Learning Theory, pages 152-192, 2016. Google Scholar
  3. Khanh Do Ba, Piotr Indyk, Eric Price, and David P. Woodruff. Lower bounds for sparse recovery. In ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 1190-1197, 2010. Google Scholar
  4. Rui M. Castro, Jarvis Haupt, Robert Nowak, and Gil M. Raz. Finding needles in noisy haystacks. In International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 5133-5136, 2008. Google Scholar
  5. Anna C. Gilbert, Yi Li, Ely Porat, and Martin J. Strauss. Approximate sparse recovery: optimizing time and measurements. SIAM Journal on Computing, 41(2):436-453, 2012. Google Scholar
  6. Rishi Gupta, Piotr Indyk, Eric Price, and Yaron Rachlin. Compressive sensing with local geometric features. International Journal of Computational Geometry &Applications, 22(04):365-390, 2012. Google Scholar
  7. Jarvis Haupt, Waheed U Bajwa, Michael Rabbat, and Robert Nowak. Compressed sensing for networked data. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 25(2):92-101, 2008. Google Scholar
  8. Jarvis Haupt, Robert Nowak, and Rui Castro. Adaptive sensing for sparse signal recovery. In Digital Signal Processing Workshop and IEEE Signal Processing Education Workshop, pages 702-707, 2009. Google Scholar
  9. Jarvis D. Haupt, Richard G. Baraniuk, Rui M. Castro, and Robert D. Nowak. Compressive distilled sensing: Sparse recovery using adaptivity in compressive measurements. In Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, pages 1551-1555, 2009. Google Scholar
  10. Piotr Indyk, Eric Price, and David P. Woodruff. On the power of adaptivity in sparse recovery. In Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 285-294, 2011. Google Scholar
  11. Shihao Ji, Ya Xue, and Lawrence Carin. Bayesian compressive sensing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 56(6):2346-2356, 2008. Google Scholar
  12. Raghunandan M. Kainkaryam, Angela Bruex, Anna C. Gilbert, John Schiefelbein, and Peter J. Woolf. poolmc: Smart pooling of mrna samples in microarray experiments. BMC Bioinformatics, 11:299, 2010. Google Scholar
  13. Yi Li and Vasileios Nakos. Sublinear-time algorithms for compressive phase retrieval. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.02917, 2017. Google Scholar
  14. Dmitry M. Malioutov, Sujay Sanghavi, and Alan S. Willsky. Compressed sensing with sequential observations. In International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pages 3357-3360, 2008. Google Scholar
  15. Tom Morgan and Jelani Nelson. A note on reductions between compressed sensing guarantees. CoRR, abs/1606.00757, 2016. Google Scholar
  16. Shanmugavelayutham Muthukrishnan. Data streams: Algorithms and applications. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 1(2):117-236, 2005. Google Scholar
  17. Eric Price and David P. Woodruff. (1+eps)-approximate sparse recovery. In IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 295-304, 2011. Google Scholar
  18. Eric Price and David P. Woodruff. Lower bounds for adaptive sparse recovery. In ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 652-663, 2013. Google Scholar
  19. Noam Shental, Amnon Amir, and Or Zuk. Rare-allele detection using compressed se(que)nsing. CoRR, abs/0909.0400, 2009. Google Scholar
  20. Tasuku Soma and Yuichi Yoshida. Non-convex compressed sensing with the sum-of-squares method. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2016, Arlington, VA, USA, January 10-12, 2016, pages 570-579, 2016. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail