Conflict Free Feedback Vertex Set: A Parameterized Dichotomy

Authors Akanksha Agrawal, Pallavi Jain, Lawqueen Kanesh, Daniel Lokshtanov, Saket Saurabh



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.MFCS.2018.53.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.6 MB
  • 15 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Akanksha Agrawal
  • Institute of Computer Science and Control, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA SZTAKI), Budapest, Hungary
Pallavi Jain
  • Institute of Mathematical Sciences, HBNI, Chennai, India
Lawqueen Kanesh
  • Institute of Mathematical Sciences, HBNI, Chennai, India
Daniel Lokshtanov
  • Department of Informatics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
Saket Saurabh
  • Department of Informatics, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, Institute of Mathematical Sciences, HBNI, Chennai, India, UMI ReLax

Cite As Get BibTex

Akanksha Agrawal, Pallavi Jain, Lawqueen Kanesh, Daniel Lokshtanov, and Saket Saurabh. Conflict Free Feedback Vertex Set: A Parameterized Dichotomy. In 43rd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 117, pp. 53:1-53:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2018.53

Abstract

In this paper we study recently introduced conflict version of the classical Feedback Vertex Set (FVS) problem. For a family of graphs F, we consider the problem F-CF-Feedback Vertex Set (F-CF-FVS, for short). The F-CF-FVS problem takes as an input a graph G, a graph H in F (where V(G)=V(H)), and an integer k, and the objective is to decide if there is a set S subseteq V(G) of size at most k such that G-S is a forest and S is an independent set in H. Observe that if we instantiate F to be the family of edgeless graphs then we get the classical FVS problem. Jain, Kanesh, and Misra [CSR 2018] showed that in contrast to FVS, F-CF-FVS is W[1]-hard on general graphs and admits an FPT algorithm if F is the family of d-degenerate graphs. In this paper, we relate F-CF-FVS to the Independent Set problem on special classes of graphs, and obtain a complete dichotomy result on the Parameterized Complexity of the problem F-CF-FVS, when F is a hereditary graph family. In particular, we show that F-CF-FVS is FPT parameterized by the solution size if and only if F+Cluster IS is FPT parameterized by the solution size. Here, F+Cluster IS is the Independent Set problem in the (edge) union of a graph G in F and a cluster graph H (G and H are explicitly given). Next, we exploit this characterization to obtain new FPT results as well as intractability results for F-CF-FVS. In particular, we give an FPT algorithm for F+Cluster IS when F is the family of K_{i,j}-free graphs. We show that for the family of bipartite graph B, B-CF-FVS is W[1]-hard, when parameterized by the solution size. Finally, we consider, for each 0< epsilon<1, the family of graphs F_epsilon, which comprise of graphs G such that |E(G)| <= |V(G)|^(2-epsilon), and show that F_epsilon-CF-FVS is W[1]-hard, when parameterized by the solution size, for every 0<epsilon<1.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Graph algorithms analysis
  • Theory of computation → Fixed parameter tractability
  • Theory of computation → W hierarchy
Keywords
  • Conflict-free
  • Feedback Vertex Set
  • FPT algorithm
  • W[1]-hardness

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Akanksha Agrawal, Sushmita Gupta, Saket Saurabh, and Roohani Sharma. Improved algorithms and combinatorial bounds for independent feedback vertex set. In IPEC, volume 63 of LIPIcs, pages 2:1-2:14, 2016. Google Scholar
  2. Akanksha Agrawal, Sudeshna Kolay, Daniel Lokshtanov, and Saket Saurabh. A faster FPT algorithm and a smaller kernel for block graph vertex deletion. In LATIN, volume 9644 of LNCS, pages 1-13, 2016. Google Scholar
  3. Akanksha Agrawal, Daniel Lokshtanov, Amer E. Mouawad, and Saket Saurabh. Simultaneous feedback vertex set: A parameterized perspective. In STACS, pages 7:1-7:15, 2016. Google Scholar
  4. Matthias Bentert, René van Bevern, and Rolf Niedermeier. (wireless) scheduling, graph classes, and c-colorable subgraphs. CoRR, abs/1712.06481, 2017. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.06481.
  5. Béla Bollobás. Extremal graph theory. Courier Corporation, 2004. Google Scholar
  6. Leizhen Cai and Junjie Ye. Dual connectedness of edge-bicolored graphs and beyond. In MFCS, volume 8635, pages 141-152, 2014. Google Scholar
  7. Jianer Chen, Fedor V. Fomin, Yang Liu, Songjian Lu, and Yngve Villanger. Improved algorithms for feedback vertex set problems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 74(7):1188-1198, 2008. Google Scholar
  8. Marek Cygan, Fedor V. Fomin, Lukasz Kowalik, Daniel Lokshtanov, Dániel Marx, Marcin Pilipczuk, Michal Pilipczuk, and Saket Saurabh. Parameterized Algorithms. Springer, 2015. Google Scholar
  9. Reinhard Diestel. Graph Theory, 4th Edition, volume 173 of Graduate texts in mathematics. Springer, 2012. Google Scholar
  10. Michael R. Fellows, Danny Hermelin, Frances A. Rosamond, and Stéphane Vialette. On the parameterized complexity of multiple-interval graph problems. Theoretical computer science, 410(1):53-61, 2009. Google Scholar
  11. Zoltán Füredi. On the number of edges of quadrilateral-free graphs. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 68(1):1-6, 1996. Google Scholar
  12. Pallavi Jain, Lawqueen Kanesh, and Pranabendu Misra. Conflict free version of covering problems on graphs: Classical and parameterized. In CSR, pages 194-206, 2018. Google Scholar
  13. Tomasz Kociumaka and Marcin Pilipczuk. Faster deterministic feedback vertex set. Information Processing Letters, 114(10):556-560, 2014. Google Scholar
  14. Neeldhara Misra, Geevarghese Philip, Venkatesh Raman, and Saket Saurabh. On parameterized independent feedback vertex set. Theoretical Computer Science, 461:65-75, 2012. Google Scholar
  15. Neeldhara Misra, Geevarghese Philip, Venkatesh Raman, Saket Saurabh, and Somnath Sikdar. FPT algorithms for connected feedback vertex set. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 24(2):131-146, 2012. Google Scholar
  16. Bruce A. Reed, Kaleigh Smith, and Adrian Vetta. Finding odd cycle transversals. Operations Research Letters, 32(4):299-301, 2004. Google Scholar
  17. Jan Arne Telle and Yngve Villanger. FPT algorithms for domination in biclique-free graphs. In ESA, pages 802-812, 2012. Google Scholar
  18. René van Bevern, Matthias Mnich, Rolf Niedermeier, and Mathias Weller. Interval scheduling and colorful independent sets. Journal of Scheduling, 18(5):449-469, 2015. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail