A Low Energy FPGA Platform for Real-Time Event-Based Control

Authors Silvano Seva , Claudia Esther Lukaschewsky Mauriziano, William Fornaciari , Alberto Leva



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

OASIcs.NG-RES.2020.4.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.69 MB
  • 11 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Silvano Seva
  • DEIB, Politecnico di Milano, Italy
Claudia Esther Lukaschewsky Mauriziano
  • Graduate student at Politecnico di Milano, Italy
William Fornaciari
  • DEIB, Politecnico di Milano, Italy
Alberto Leva
  • DEIB, Politecnico di Milano, Italy

Cite As Get BibTex

Silvano Seva, Claudia Esther Lukaschewsky Mauriziano, William Fornaciari, and Alberto Leva. A Low Energy FPGA Platform for Real-Time Event-Based Control. In Workshop on Next Generation Real-Time Embedded Systems (NG-RES 2020). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 77, pp. 4:1-4:11, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020) https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.NG-RES.2020.4

Abstract

We present a wireless sensor node suitable for event-based real-time control networks. The node achieves low-power operation thanks to tight clock synchronisation with the network master (at present we refer to a star network but extensions are envisaged). Also, the node does not employ any programmable device but rather an FPGA, thus being inherently immune to attacks based on code tampering. Experimental results on a simple laboratory apparatus are presented.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Hardware → Wireless integrated network sensors
  • Computer systems organization → Embedded and cyber-physical systems
Keywords
  • real-time
  • event-based control
  • FPGA
  • wireless control networks

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. K.E. Årzén. A simple event-based PID controller. In Proc. 14th IFAC World Congress, volume 18, pages 423-428, Beijing, China, 1999. Google Scholar
  2. K.J. Åström. Event Based Control. In A. Astolfi and L. Marconi, editors, Analysis and Design of Nonlinear Control Systems, pages 127-147. Springer, Berlin, 2008. Google Scholar
  3. K.J. Åström and B.M. Bernhardsson. Comparison of Riemann and Lebesgue sampling for first order stochastic systems. In Proc. 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002, volume 2, pages 2011-2016, Barcelona, Spain, 2002. Google Scholar
  4. M. Beschi, A. Visioli, S. Dormido, and J. Sánchez. On the presence of equilibrium points in PI control systems with send-on-delta sampling. In Proc. 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference CDC-ECC 2011, pages 7843-7848, Orlando, FL, USA, 2011. Google Scholar
  5. T. Blevins, D. Chen, S. Han, M. Nixon, and W. Wojsznis. Process Control over Real-Time Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks. In Proc. 17th IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communication, 2015. Google Scholar
  6. T. Blevins, M. Nixon, and W. Wojsznis. Event based control applied to wireless throttling valves. In Proc. 1st International Conference on Event-based Control, Communication, and Signal Processing, Krakow, Poland, 2015. Google Scholar
  7. N. Cardoso de Castro, D. E. Quevedo, F. Garin, and C. Canudas de Wit. Energy-aware radio chip management for wireless control. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 25(6):2121-2134, 2017. Google Scholar
  8. Y. Wei et Al. RT-wifi: Real-time high-speed communication protocol for wireless cyber-physical control applications. In 2013 IEEE 34th Real-Time Systems Symposium, pages 140-149, Nashville, Tennessee, 2013. Google Scholar
  9. G. Alderisi G. Patti and L. L. Bello. Introducing multi-level communication in the IEEE 802.15.4e protocol: The MultiChannel-LLDN. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA), pages 1-8, Barcelona, Spain, 2014. Google Scholar
  10. J.W. Grizzle, C. Chevallereau, and C.L. Shih. HZD-based control of a five-link underactuated 3D bipedal robot. In Proc. 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pages 5206-5213, Cancún, Mexico, 2008. Google Scholar
  11. T. Henningsson and A. Cervin. A simple model for the interference between event-based control loops using a shared medium. In Proc. 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pages 3240-3245, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2010. Google Scholar
  12. D. Henriksson and A. Cervin. Optimal on-line sampling period assignment for real-time control tasks based on plant state information. In Proc. 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pages 4469-4474, Seville, Spain, 2005. Google Scholar
  13. B. Hensel, J. Ploennigs, V. Vasyutynskyy, and K. Kabitzsch. A simple PI controller tuning rule for sensor energy efficiency with level-crossing sampling. In Proc. 9th IEEE International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals and Devices, pages 1-6, Chemnitz, Germany, 2012. Google Scholar
  14. B. Hensel, V. Vasyutynskyy, J. Ploennigs, and K. Kabitzsch. An adaptive PI controller for room temperature control with level-crossing sampling. In Proc. 2012 UKACC International Conference on Control, pages 197-204, Cardiff, United Kingdom, 2012. Google Scholar
  15. A. Leva, F. Terraneo, and S. Seva. Periodic event-based control with past measurements transmission. In 2017 3rd International Conference on Event-Based Control, Communication and Signal Processing (EBCCSP), pages 1-8, Madeira, Portugal, 2017. Google Scholar
  16. Q. Liu, Z. Wang, X. He, and D. Zhou. A survey of event-based strategies on control and estimation. Systems Science &Control Engineering: An Open Access Journal, 2(1):90-97, 2014. Google Scholar
  17. S. Magnenat, P. Rétornaz, M. Bonani, V. Longchamp, and F. Mondada. ASEBA: A modular architecture for event-based control of complex robots. IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics, 16(2):321-329, 2010. Google Scholar
  18. M. Rabi and K.H. Johansson. Event-triggered strategies for industrial control over wireless networks. In Proc. 4th Annual International Conference on Wireless Internet, pages 34:1-34:7, Brussels, Belgium, 2008. Google Scholar
  19. J. Sijs and M. Lazar. Event Based State Estimation With Time Synchronous Updates. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 57(10):2650-2655, 2012. Google Scholar
  20. J. Song, A.K. Mok, D. Chen, M. Nixon, et al. Challenges of wireless control in process industry. In Workshop on Research Directions for Security and Networking in Critical Real-Time and Embedded Systems, 2006. Google Scholar
  21. F. Terraneo, A. Leva, and W. Fornaciari. A High-Performance, Energy-Efficient Node for a Wide Range of WSN Applications. In Proc. 2016 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks, Graz, 2016. Google Scholar
  22. F. Terraneo, L. Rinaldi, M. Maggio, A. V. Papadopoulos, and A. Leva. FLOPSYNC-2: Efficient monotonic clock synchronisation. In 2014 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, pages 11-20, Rome, Italy, 2014. Google Scholar
  23. F. Tramarin, A. K. Mok, and S. Han. Real-Time and Reliable Industrial Control Over Wireless LANs: Algorithms, Protocols, and Future Directions. Proceedings of the IEEE, 107(6):1027-1052, 2019. Google Scholar
  24. X.M. Zhang, Q.L. Han, and Bao-Lin B.L. Zhang. An overview and deep investigation on sampled-data-based event-triggered control and filtering for networked systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13(1):4-16, 2016. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail