Reaching Your Goal Optimally by Playing at Random with No Memory

Authors Benjamin Monmege , Julie Parreaux, Pierre-Alain Reynier



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.CONCUR.2020.26.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.59 MB
  • 21 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Benjamin Monmege
  • Aix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, CNRS, LIS, Marseille, France
Julie Parreaux
  • ENS Rennes, France
Pierre-Alain Reynier
  • Aix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, CNRS, LIS, Marseille, France

Cite As Get BibTex

Benjamin Monmege, Julie Parreaux, and Pierre-Alain Reynier. Reaching Your Goal Optimally by Playing at Random with No Memory. In 31st International Conference on Concurrency Theory (CONCUR 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 171, pp. 26:1-26:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CONCUR.2020.26

Abstract

Shortest-path games are two-player zero-sum games played on a graph equipped with integer weights. One player, that we call Min, wants to reach a target set of states while minimising the total weight, and the other one has an antagonistic objective. This combination of a qualitative reachability objective and a quantitative total-payoff objective is one of the simplest settings where Min needs memory (pseudo-polynomial in the weights) to play optimally. In this article, we aim at studying a tradeoff allowing Min to play at random, but using no memory. We show that Min can achieve the same optimal value in both cases. In particular, we compute a randomised memoryless ε-optimal strategy when it exists, where probabilities are parametrised by ε. We also show that for some games, no optimal randomised strategies exist. We then characterise, and decide in polynomial time, the class of games admitting an optimal randomised memoryless strategy.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Software and its engineering → Formal software verification
  • Theory of computation → Algorithmic game theory
Keywords
  • Weighted games
  • Algorithmic game theory
  • Randomisation

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Christel Baier and Joost-Pieter Katoen. Principles of model checking. MIT Press, 2008. Google Scholar
  2. Dimitri P. Bertsekas and John N. Tsitsiklis. An analysis of stochastic shortest path problems. Math. Oper. Res., 16(3):580-595, 1991. Google Scholar
  3. Thomas Brihaye, Gilles Geeraerts, Axel Haddad, and Benjamin Monmege. Pseudopolynomial iterative algorithm to solve total-payoff games and min-cost reachability games. Acta Informatica, 54, July 2016. Google Scholar
  4. Thomas Brihaye, Gilles Geeraerts, Axel Haddad, and Benjamin Monmege. Pseudopolynomial iterative algorithm to solve total-payoff games and min-cost reachability games. Acta Informatica, 54(1):85-125, February 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00236-016-0276-z.
  5. Krishnendu Chatterjee, Luca de Alfaro, and Thomas A. Henzinger. Trading memory for randomness. In Proceedings of the The Quantitative Evaluation of Systems, First International Conference, QEST '04, pages 206-217, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society. URL: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1025129.1026090.
  6. Krishnendu Chatterjee, Thomas A. Henzinger, and Marcin Jurdziński. Mean-payoff parity games. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS'05), pages 178-187. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2005. Google Scholar
  7. Krishnendu Chatterjee, Thomas A. Henzinger, and Vinayak S. Prabhu. Trading infinite memory for uniform randomness in timed games. In Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control, 11th International Workshop, HSCC 2008, St. Louis, MO, USA, April 22-24, 2008. Proceedings, pages 87-100, 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78929-1_7.
  8. Krishnendu Chatterjee, Mickael Randour, and Jean-François Raskin. Strategy synthesis for multi-dimensional quantitative objectives. Acta Informatica, 51:129-163, 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00236-013-0182-6.
  9. Hugo Gimbert and Wiesław Zielonka. When can you play positionally? In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS'04), volume 3153 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 686-698. Springer, 2004. Google Scholar
  10. Erich Grädel, Wolfgang Thomas, and Thomas Wilke. Automata, Logics, and Infinite Games: A Guide to Current Research, volume 2500 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2002. Google Scholar
  11. Leonid Khachiyan, Endre Boros, Konrad Borys, Khaled Elbassioni, Vladimir Gurvich, Gabor Rudolf, and Jihui Zhao. On short paths interdiction problems: Total and node-wise limited interdiction. Theory of Computing Systems, 43:204-233, 2008. Google Scholar
  12. Donald A. Martin. The determinacy of Blackwell games. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 63(4):1565-1581, 1998. Google Scholar
  13. John F. Nash. Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 36(1):48-49, 1950. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail