Quantum Approximate Counting with Nonadaptive Grover Iterations

Authors Ramgopal Venkateswaran, Ryan O'Donnell



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.STACS.2021.59.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.61 MB
  • 12 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Ramgopal Venkateswaran
  • Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Ryan O'Donnell
  • Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Scott Aaronson and Patrick Rall for helpful communications.

Cite As Get BibTex

Ramgopal Venkateswaran and Ryan O'Donnell. Quantum Approximate Counting with Nonadaptive Grover Iterations. In 38th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 187, pp. 59:1-59:12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2021.59

Abstract

Approximate Counting refers to the problem where we are given query access to a function f : [N] → {0,1}, and we wish to estimate K = #{x : f(x) = 1} to within a factor of 1+ε (with high probability), while minimizing the number of queries. In the quantum setting, Approximate Counting can be done with O(min (√{N/ε}, √{N/K} / ε) queries. It has recently been shown that this can be achieved by a simple algorithm that only uses "Grover iterations"; however the algorithm performs these iterations adaptively. Motivated by concerns of computational simplicity, we consider algorithms that use Grover iterations with limited adaptivity. We show that algorithms using only nonadaptive Grover iterations can achieve O(√{N/ε}) query complexity, which is tight.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Quantum complexity theory
Keywords
  • quantum approximate counting
  • Grover search

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Scott Aaronson and Patrick Rall. Quantum approximate counting, simplified. In Symposium on Simplicity in Algorithms, pages 24-32. SIAM, 2020. Google Scholar
  2. Michel Boyer, Gilles Brassard, Peter Høyer, and Alain Tapp. Tight bounds on quantum searching. Fortschritte der Physik: Progress of Physics, 46(4-5):493-505, 1998. Google Scholar
  3. Gilles Brassard, Peter Høyer, Michele Mosca, and Alain Tapp. Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation. Contemporary Mathematics, 305:53-74, 2002. Google Scholar
  4. Paul Burchard. Lower bounds for parallel quantum counting, 2019. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.04555.
  5. Dmitry Grinko, Julien Gacon, Christa Zoufal, and Stefan Woerner. Iterative quantum amplitude estimation, 2020. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1912.05559.
  6. Lov Grover. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 212-219, 1996. Google Scholar
  7. Kouhei Nakaji. Faster amplitude estimation, 2020. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.02417.
  8. Ashwin Nayak and Felix Wu. The quantum query complexity of approximating the median and related statistics. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 384-393, 1999. Google Scholar
  9. Yohichi Suzuki, Shumpei Uno, Rudy Raymond, Tomoki Tanaka, Tamiya Onodera, and Naoki Yamamoto. Amplitude estimation without phase estimation. Quantum Information Processing, 19(2):75, 2020. Google Scholar
  10. Chu-Ryang Wei. Simpler quantum counting. Quantum Information and Computation, 19(11&12):0967-0983, 2019. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail