Document Open Access Logo

Moving Classes in a Large Programming Course Online: An Experience Report

Authors Hrafn Loftsson , Ásrún Matthíasdóttir

PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

OASIcs.ICPEC.2021.2.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.48 MB
  • 13 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Hrafn Loftsson
  • Department of Computer Science, Reykjavik University, Iceland
Ásrún Matthíasdóttir
  • Department of Sport Science, Reykjavik University, Iceland

Cite As Get BibTex

Hrafn Loftsson and Ásrún Matthíasdóttir. Moving Classes in a Large Programming Course Online: An Experience Report. In Second International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2021). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 91, pp. 2:1-2:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021) https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.ICPEC.2021.2

Abstract

We present an experience report on moving face-to-face classes in a large CS1 course to an online format, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The course is based on the flipped classroom approach and team-based learning. Students prepare for classes by reading specific chapters of the textbook and/or by watching pre-recorded videos. The classes are synchronous, in which students take quizzes and work on programming assignments in teams, with the guidance of tutors. To evaluate the implementation, we compared the results from surveys and exams between 2019 and 2020. The results show that students were at least as satisfied with the online classes in 2020 in comparison with face-to-face classes from the previous year, and generally satisfied with the organization of the course and the learning experience. Moreover, we found no discernible change in the grades on the midterm exams and the final exam between the two years. In the future, we might allow the students to choose the class format that best fits their individual needs.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Applied computing → Education
Keywords
  • online learning
  • flipped classroom
  • team-based learning
  • introductory programming
  • CS1
  • COVID-19

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
    0
    Metadata Views

References

  1. Lina Battestilli, Ignacio X. Domínguez, and Maanasa Thyagarajan. Toward Finding Online Activity Patterns in a Flipped Programming Course. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '20, page 1345, New York, NY, USA, 2020. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3372626.
  2. Brett A. Becker and Keith Quille. 50 Years of CS1 at SIGCSE: A Review of the Evolution of Introductory Programming Education Research. In Proceedings of the 50^th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '19, page 338–344, New York, NY, USA, 2019. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287432.
  3. Charles A. Brown, Kreag Danvers, and David T. Doran. Student Perceptions on Using Guided Reading Questions to Motivate Student Reading in the Flipped Classroom. Accounting Education, 25(3):256-271, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1165124.
  4. Joelle Elmaleh and Venky Shankararaman. Improving student learning in an introductory programming course using flipped classroom and competency framework. In 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pages 49-55, 2017. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7942823.
  5. Swapna Gottipatti and Venky Shankaraman. Rapid Transition of a Technical Course from Face-to-Face to Online. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, pages 1-8, 2021. URL: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5401.
  6. Raelke Grimmer, Andrew Pollard, and Nicola Rolls. COVID-19 induced change in higher education: Reflections on rapidly transitioning a first-year undergraduate academic literacies unit from face-to-face to online. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 14(2):95-105, 2020. URL: https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/695.
  7. Sandy Irani and Kameryn Denaro. Incorporating Active Learning Strategies and Instructor Presence into an Online Discrete Mathematics Class. In Proceedings of the 51^st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '20, page 1186–1192, New York, NY, USA, 2020. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366904.
  8. Krisztina V. Jakobsen and Megan Knetemann. Putting Structure to Flipped Classrooms Using Team-Based Learning. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1):175-185, 2017. Google Scholar
  9. Patricia Lasserre. Adaptation of Team-based Learning on a First Term Programming Class. In Proceedings of the 14^th Annual ACM SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE '09, page 186–190, New York, NY, USA, 2009. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/1562877.1562937.
  10. Hrafn Loftsson and Ásrún Matthíasdóttir. Using Flipped Classroom and Team-Based Learning in a First-Semester Programming Course: An Experience Report. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering, TALE '19. IEEE, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE48000.2019.9225985.
  11. Ásrún Matthíasdóttir and Hrafn Loftsson. Improving the Implementation of a First-Semester Programming Course. In Proceedings of the 16^th International CDIO Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2020. CDIO. URL: http://www.cdio.org/content/improving-implementation-first-semester-programming-course.
  12. Abdallah Mohamed. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Flipped Teaching in a Mixed-Ability CS1 Course. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE '20, page 452–458, New York, NY, USA, 2020. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3341525.3387395.
  13. William F. Punch and Richard Enbody. The Practice of Computing Using Python. Pearson Education, New York, NY, 3rd. edition, 2017. Google Scholar
  14. Wainhouse Research. Evaluation of the Zoom Cloud Video Conference Service, 2015. URL: https://zoom.us/whitepaper?case=wainhouse.
  15. Anthony Robins, Janet Rountree, and Nathan Rountree. Learning and Teaching Programming: A Review and Discussion. Computer Science Education, 13(2):137-172, 2003. Google Scholar
  16. Sudipta Roy and Bonnie Covelli. COVID-19 Induced Transition from Classroom to Online Mid Semester: Case Study on Faculty and Students’ Preferences and Opinions. Higher Learning Research Communications, 11:10-32, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v11i0.1197.
  17. Manoj D. Souza and Paul Rodriques. Investigating the Effectiveness of the Flipped Classroom in an Introductory Programming Course. The New Educational Review, 40(1), 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2015.40.2.11.
  18. Gina Sprint and Erik Fox. Improving Student Study Choices in CS1 with Gamification and Flipped Classrooms. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '20, page 773–779, New York, NY, USA, 2020. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366888.
  19. Christian Stöhr, Christophe Demazière, and Tom Adawi. The polarizing effect of the online flipped classroom. Computer Education, 147:103789, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103789.
  20. Kalpathi Subramanian and Kiran Budhrani. Influence of Course Design on Student Engagement and Motivation in an Online Course. In Proceedings of the 51^st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '20, page 303–308, New York, NY, USA, 2020. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366828.
  21. Chao Wang and Michael Goryll. Design and Implementation of an Online Digital Design Course. In 123^rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, volume 2016-June. American Society for Engineering Education, 2016. URL: https://asu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/design-and-implementation-of-an-online-digital-design-course.
  22. Gang Wang, Hong Zhao, Yun Guo, and Min Li. Integration of Flipped Classroom and Problem Based Learning Model and its Implementation in University Programming Course. In 2019 14th International Conference on Computer Science Education (ICCSE), pages 606-610, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2019.8845525.
  23. Christopher Watson and Frederick W.B. Li. Failure Rates in Introductory Programming Revisited. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE '14, page 39–44, New York, NY, USA, 2014. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2591749.
  24. Chris Wilcox and Albert Lionelle. Quantifying the Benefits of Prior Programming Experience in an Introductory Computer Science Course. In Proceedings of the 49^th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '18, New York, NY, USA, 2018. Association for Computing Machinery. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159480.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact