Active Methodologies in Incoming Programming Classes (Short Paper)

Authors João Paulo Aires, Simone Bello Kaminski Aires, Maria João Varanda Pereira , Luís M. Alves



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

OASIcs.ICPEC.2021.8.pdf
  • Filesize: 1.58 MB
  • 9 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

João Paulo Aires
  • Departamento Acadêmico de Computação (DAINF), Federal University of Technology of Paraná (UTFPR), Brasil
Simone Bello Kaminski Aires
  • Departamento Acadêmico de Computação (DAINF), Federal University of Technology of Paraná (UTFPR), Brasil
Maria João Varanda Pereira
  • Research Centre in Digitalization and Intelligent Robotics (CeDRI), Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Portugal
Luís M. Alves
  • Research Centre in Digitalization and Intelligent Robotics (CeDRI), Polytechnic Institute of Bragança, Portugal

Cite As Get BibTex

João Paulo Aires, Simone Bello Kaminski Aires, Maria João Varanda Pereira, and Luís M. Alves. Active Methodologies in Incoming Programming Classes (Short Paper). In Second International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2021). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 91, pp. 8:1-8:9, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021) https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.ICPEC.2021.8

Abstract

Innovative approaches in teaching programming have been required to improve the success of incoming programming students. This work presents the initial results of a teaching strategy implemented in the Algorithms subject of a Computer Science course. Ninety-five students, enrolled in this subject during the first semester of the course, participated in the research. The reported activity is related with active methodologies of teaching and Problem-Based Learning, being developed on the first day of class in groups of up to five students. The activity was based in two actions: 1) answering a questionnaire associating computing elements to daily life routines; and, 2) even without programming concepts knowledge, develop a smartphone application. Each group received a questionnaire containing 19 questions, divided into four blocks. What can be perceived with the accomplishment of this work, was the enthusiasm, motivation and engagement of the students who, even being unknown from each other, organized themselves in the groups and researched the necessary strategies to complete the challenge. The teacher acted as an advisor in the teaching process, conducting the experiment in order to lead students to find the solution.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Social and professional topics → Computer science education
  • Software and its engineering → Imperative languages
Keywords
  • Teaching Programming
  • Active Methodologies
  • Learning Innovation

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. João Paulo Aires and Luiz Alberto Pilatti. Aprendizagem significativa por meio do ensino adaptativo. Revista Espacios, 37(29), 2016. Google Scholar
  2. João Paulo Aires and Luiz Alberto Pilatti. Feyerabend promovendo a aprendizagem significativa por intermédio do ensino adaptativo. In IV Congresso Nacional de Educação (CONEDU 2017). Editora Realize, 2017. Google Scholar
  3. David P. Ausubel. Aquisição e Retenção de Conhecimentos: Uma Perspectiva Cognitiva. Plátano-Edições Técnicas, 04-2003 edition, 2003. Google Scholar
  4. Lilian Bacich and José Moran. Metodologias Ativas para uma Educação Inovadora. Penso, Porto Alegre, 10-2017 edition, 2017. Google Scholar
  5. Lilian Bacich and José Moran. Revolucionando a sala de aula: como envolver o estudante aplicando técnicas de metodologias ativas de aprendizagem. SAtlas, 1. edição edition, 2017. Google Scholar
  6. Tina Barseghian. Three trends that define the future of teaching and learning. https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/7854/three-trends-that-define-the-future-of-teaching-and-learning. Accessed: 2021-02-09.
  7. William Bender. Project-Based Learning: Differentiating Instruction for the 21st Century. Corwin, 1st edition, 2012. Google Scholar
  8. Neusi A. N. Berbel. As metodologias ativas e a promoção da autonomia de estudantes. Ciências Sociais e Humanas, 32(1):25-40, 2011. Google Scholar
  9. Pablo Farias, Ana Martin, and Cínthia Cristo. Aprendizagem ativa na educação em saúde: Percurso histórico e aplicações. Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, 39(1):143-150, 2015. Google Scholar
  10. Richard M. Felder and Rebecca Brent. Active learning: An introduction. ASQ Higher Education Brief, 2(4), 2009. Google Scholar
  11. Ricardo R. Fragelli. Trezentos: Aprendizagem colaborativa como uma alternativa ao problema da ansiedade em provas. Revista Eletrônica Gestão & Saúde Brasília, 6(2):860-872, 2015. Google Scholar
  12. Ricardo R. Fragelli and T. B. Fragelli. Three hundred: the human dimension of the method. Educar em Revista, 1(63):253-265, 2017. Google Scholar
  13. Roy Hanney. Doing, being, becoming: a historical appraisal of the modalities of project-based learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(6):769-783, 2018. Google Scholar
  14. John Larmer and John Mergendoller. Setting the Standard for Project Based Learning. ASCD, Alexandria, VA, USA, 2015. Google Scholar
  15. Eric Mazur. Peer Instruction: a revolução da aprendizagem ativa. Penso, Porto Alegre, 2015. Google Scholar
  16. MIT. Mit app inventor. https://appinventor.mit.edu/. Accessed: 2021-03-08.
  17. MIT. Scratch. https://scratch.mit.edu/. Accessed: 2021-03-08.
  18. Sandra Mitre, Rodrigo Siqueira-Batista, José Girardi-de Mendonça, Neila Morais-Pinto, Cynthia Meirelles, Cláudia Pinto-Porto, Tânia Moreira, and Leandro Hoffmann. Metodologias ativas de ensino-aprendizagem na formação profissional em saúde: debates atuais. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 2(13):2133-2144, 2008. Google Scholar
  19. José Morán. Mudando a educação com metodologias ativas. Coleção Mídias Contemporâneas. Convergências Midiáticas, Educação e Cidadania: aproximações jovens, 2:15-32, 2015. Google Scholar
  20. João Silva, Gilvandenys Sales, and Juscileide Castro. Gamificação como estratégia de aprendizagem ativa no ensino de física. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 41(4), 2019. Google Scholar
  21. Cinthia B. Spricigo. Estudo de caso como abordagem de ensino. Revista Tuiuti: Ciência e Cultura, 5(58), 2019. Google Scholar
  22. Romero Tavares. Aprendizagem significativa, codificação dual e objetos de aprendizagem. Revista Brasileira de Informaática na Educação, 18(2):4-16, 2010. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail