Interactive Proofs for Synthesizing Quantum States and Unitaries

Authors Gregory Rosenthal , Henry Yuen



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.112.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.54 MB
  • 4 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Gregory Rosenthal
  • Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Canada
Henry Yuen
  • Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

Cite AsGet BibTex

Gregory Rosenthal and Henry Yuen. Interactive Proofs for Synthesizing Quantum States and Unitaries. In 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 215, pp. 112:1-112:4, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2022.112

Abstract

Whereas quantum complexity theory has traditionally been concerned with problems arising from classical complexity theory (such as computing boolean functions), it also makes sense to study the complexity of inherently quantum operations such as constructing quantum states or performing unitary transformations. With this motivation, we define models of interactive proofs for synthesizing quantum states and unitaries, where a polynomial-time quantum verifier interacts with an untrusted quantum prover, and a verifier who accepts also outputs an approximation of the target state (for the state synthesis problem) or the result of the target unitary applied to the input state (for the unitary synthesis problem); furthermore there should exist an "honest" prover which the verifier accepts with probability 1. Our main result is a "state synthesis" analogue of the inclusion PSPACE ⊆ IP: any sequence of states computable by a polynomial-space quantum algorithm (which may run for exponential time) admits an interactive protocol of the form described above. Leveraging this state synthesis protocol, we also give a unitary synthesis protocol for polynomial space-computable unitaries that act nontrivially on only a polynomial-dimensional subspace. We obtain analogous results in the setting with multiple entangled provers as well.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Interactive proof systems
  • Theory of computation → Quantum complexity theory
  • Theory of computation → Quantum complexity theory
Keywords
  • interactive proofs
  • quantum state complexity
  • quantum unitary complexity

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Scott Aaronson. Quantum copy-protection and quantum money. In CCC, pages 229-242, 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.2009.42.
  2. Scott Aaronson. The complexity of quantum states and transformations: from quantum money to black holes, 2016. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.05256.
  3. Scott Aaronson. Open problems related to quantum query complexity, 2021. URL: https://www.scottaaronson.com/papers/open.pdf.
  4. Marco Cerezo, Andrew Arrasmith, Ryan Babbush, Simon C. Benjamin, Suguru Endo, Keisuke Fujii, Jarrod R. McClean, Kosuke Mitarai, Xiao Yuan, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J. Coles. Variational quantum algorithms, 2020. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.09265.
  5. Sandy Irani, Anand Natarajan, Chinmay Nirkhe, Sujit Rao, and Henry Yuen. Quantum search-to-decision reductions and the state synthesis problem, 2021. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.02999.
  6. Rahul Jain, Zhengfeng Ji, Sarvagya Upadhyay, and John Watrous. QIP = PSPACE. J. ACM, 58(6):1-27, 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/2049697.2049704.
  7. Zhengfeng Ji, Yi-Kai Liu, and Fang Song. Pseudorandom quantum states. In CRYPTO, pages 126-152, 2018. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96878-0_5.
  8. Zhengfeng Ji, Anand Natarajan, Thomas Vidick, John Wright, and Henry Yuen. MIP^* = RE, 2020. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.04383.
  9. Daniel A. Lidar and Todd A. Brun. Quantum Error Correction. Cambridge University Press, 2013. URL: https://www.cambridge.org/9780521897877.
  10. Carsten Lund, Lance Fortnow, Howard Karloff, and Noam Nisan. Algebraic methods for interactive proof systems. J. ACM, 39(4):859-868, 1992. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/146585.146605.
  11. Adi Shamir. IP = PSPACE. J. ACM, 39(4):869-877, 1992. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/146585.146609.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail