Bi-Criteria Approximation Algorithms for Bounded-Degree Subset TSP

Authors Zachary Friggstad, Ramin Mousavi



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.ISAAC.2022.8.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.73 MB
  • 17 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Zachary Friggstad
  • Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Ramin Mousavi
  • Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

Cite As Get BibTex

Zachary Friggstad and Ramin Mousavi. Bi-Criteria Approximation Algorithms for Bounded-Degree Subset TSP. In 33rd International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 248, pp. 8:1-8:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2022.8

Abstract

We initiate the study of the Bounded-Degree Subset Traveling Salesman problem (BDSTSP) in which we are given a graph G = (V,E) with edge cost c_e ≥ 0 on each edge e, degree bounds b_v ≥ 0 on each vertex v ∈ V and a subset of terminals X ⊆ V. The goal is to find a minimum-cost closed walk that spans all terminals and visits each vertex v ∈ V at most b_v/2 times. In this paper, we study bi-criteria approximations that find tours whose cost is within a constant-factor of the optimum tour length while violating the bounds b_v at each vertex by additive quantities.
If X = V, an adaptation of the Christofides-Serdyukov algorithm yields a (3/2, +4)-approximation, that is the tour passes through each vertex at most b_v/2+2 times (the degree of v in the multiset of edges on the tour being at most b_v + 4). This is enabled through known results in bounded-degree Steiner trees and integrality of the bounded-degree Y-join polytope. The general case X ≠ V is more challenging since we cannot pass to the metric completion on X. However, it is at least simple to get a (5/3, +4)-bicriteria approximation by using ideas similar to Hoogeveen’s TSP-Path algorithm.
Our main result is an improved approximation with marginally worse violations of the vertex bounds: a (13/8, +6)-approximation. We obtain this primarily through adapting the bounded-degree Steiner tree approximation to ensure certain "dangerous" nodes always have even degree in the resulting tree which allows us to bound the cost of the resulting degree-bounded Y-join. We also recover a (3/2, +8)-approximation for this general case.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Mathematics of computing → Approximation algorithms
Keywords
  • Linear programming
  • approximation algorithms
  • combinatorial optimization

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Hyung-Chan An, Robert Kleinberg, and David B Shmoys. Improving christofides' algorithm for the st path tsp. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 62(5):1-28, 2015. Google Scholar
  2. Nicos Christofides. Worst-case analysis of a new heuristic for the travelling salesman problem. Technical report, Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh Pa Management Sciences Research Group, 1976. Google Scholar
  3. András Frank. On a theorem of mader. Discret. Math., 101:49-57, 1992. Google Scholar
  4. Takuro Fukunaga, Zeev Nutov, and R Ravi. Iterative rounding approximation algorithms for degree-bounded node-connectivity network design. SIAM Journal on Computing, 44(5):1202-1229, 2015. Google Scholar
  5. Michel X Goemans. Minimum bounded degree spanning trees. In 2006 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'06), pages 273-282. IEEE, 2006. Google Scholar
  6. Anna R. Karlin, Nathan Klein, and Shayan Oveis Gharan. A (slightly) improved approximation algorithm for metric tsp. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2021. Google Scholar
  7. Marek Karpinski, Michael Lampis, and Richard Schmied. New inapproximability bounds for tsp. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 81(8):1665-1677, 2015. Google Scholar
  8. Rohit Khandekar, Guy Kortsarz, and Zeev Nutov. On some network design problems with degree constraints. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 79(5):725-736, 2013. Google Scholar
  9. Lap Chi Lau, Joseph Naor, Mohammad R Salavatipour, and Mohit Singh. Survivable network design with degree or order constraints. SIAM Journal on Computing, 39(3):1062-1087, 2009. Google Scholar
  10. Lap Chi Lau, Ramamoorthi Ravi, and Mohit Singh. Iterative methods in combinatorial optimization, volume 46. Cambridge University Press, 2011. Google Scholar
  11. Lap Chi Lau and Mohit Singh. Additive approximation for bounded degree survivable network design. SIAM Journal on Computing, 42(6):2217-2242, 2013. Google Scholar
  12. Lap Chi Lau and Hong Zhou. A unified algorithm for degree bounded survivable network design. Mathematical Programming, 154(1):515-532, 2015. Google Scholar
  13. Anand Louis and Nisheeth K Vishnoi. Improved algorithm for degree bounded survivable network design problem. In Scandinavian Workshop on Algorithm Theory, pages 408-419. Springer, 2010. Google Scholar
  14. Wolfgang Mader. A reduction method for edge-connectivity in graphs. Annals of discrete mathematics, 3:145-164, 1978. Google Scholar
  15. Ian Post and Chaitanya Swamy. Linear programming-based approximation algorithms for multi-vehicle minimum latency problems. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 512-531. SIAM, 2014. Google Scholar
  16. Alexander Schrijver. Combinatorial optimization: polyhedra and efficiency, volume 24. Springer Science & Business Media, 2003. Google Scholar
  17. AI Serdyukov. O nekotorykh ekstremal’nykh obkhodakh v grafakh. Upravlyayemyye sistemy, 17:76-79, 1978. Google Scholar
  18. Mohit Singh and Lap Chi Lau. Approximating minimum bounded degree spanning trees to within one of optimal. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 62(1):1-19, 2015. Google Scholar
  19. Laurence A Wolsey. Heuristic analysis, linear programming and branch and bound. In Combinatorial Optimization II, pages 121-134. Springer, 1980. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail