Dependency Matrices for Multiplayer Strategic Dependencies

Authors Dylan Bellier , Sophie Pinchinat, François Schwarzentruber



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2022.31.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.87 MB
  • 21 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Dylan Bellier
  • Univ Rennes, IRISA, CNRS, France
Sophie Pinchinat
  • Univ Rennes, IRISA, CNRS, France
François Schwarzentruber
  • Univ Rennes, IRISA, CNRS, France

Cite AsGet BibTex

Dylan Bellier, Sophie Pinchinat, and François Schwarzentruber. Dependency Matrices for Multiplayer Strategic Dependencies. In 42nd IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 250, pp. 31:1-31:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2022.31

Abstract

In multi-player games, players take their decisions on the basis of their knowledge about what other players have done, or currently do, or even, in some cases, will do. An ability to reason in games with temporal dependencies between players' decisions is a challenging topic, in particular because it involves imperfect information. In this work, we propose a theoretical framework based on dependency matrices that includes many instances of strategic dependencies in multi-player imperfect information games. For our framework to be well-defined, we get inspiration from quantified linear-time logic where each player has to label the timeline with truth values of the propositional variable she owns. We study the problem of the existence of a winning strategy for a coalition of players, show it is undecidable in general, and exhibit an interesting subclass of dependency matrices that makes the problem decidable: the class of perfect-information dependency matrices.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Modal and temporal logics
  • Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • Theory of computation → Automata over infinite objects
Keywords
  • Temporal dependency
  • Delay games
  • Strategic reasoning
  • Temporal logic

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Alfred V. Aho, Ravi Sethi, and Jeffrey D. Ullman. Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools. Addison-Wesley series in computer science / World student series edition. Addison-Wesley, 1986. URL: https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/12285707.
  2. Rajeev Alur, Thomas A Henzinger, and Orna Kupferman. Alternating-time temporal logic. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 49(5):672-713, 2002. Google Scholar
  3. Robert Berger. The undecidability of the domino problem. American Mathematical Soc., 1966. Google Scholar
  4. Krishnendu Chatterjee, Thomas A Henzinger, and Nir Piterman. Strategy logic. Information and Computation, 208(6):677-693, 2010. Google Scholar
  5. Bernd Finkbeiner. Synthesis of reactive systems. Dependable Software Systems Engineering, 45:72-98, 2016. Google Scholar
  6. David Gale and Frank M Stewart. Infinite games with perfect information. Contributions to the Theory of Games, 2(245-266):2-16, 1953. Google Scholar
  7. Edward F. Grove. Online bin packing with lookahead. In Kenneth L. Clarkson, editor, Proceedings of the Sixth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 22-24 January 1995. San Francisco, California, USA, pages 430-436. ACM/SIAM, 1995. URL: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=313651.313781.
  8. Felix Klein and Martin Zimmermann. What are strategies in delay games? borel determinacy for games with lookahead. arXiv preprint, 2015. URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.02627.
  9. Felix Klein and Martin Zimmermann. How much lookahead is needed to win infinite games? Logical Methods in Computer Science, 12, 2017. Google Scholar
  10. Gary Peterson, John Reif, and Salman Azhar. Lower bounds for multiplayer noncooperative games of incomplete information. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 41(7-8):957-992, 2001. Google Scholar
  11. Nir Piterman. From nondeterministic Büchi and Streett automata to deterministic parity automata. Logical Methods in Computer Science, 3, 2007. Google Scholar
  12. A Pnueli and R Rosner. On the synthesis of reactive systems. POPL, Austin, Texas, pages 179-190, 1989. Google Scholar
  13. Amir Pnueli. The temporal logic of programs. In 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1977), pages 46-57. IEEE, 1977. Google Scholar
  14. A Prasad Sistla, Moshe Y Vardi, and Pierre Wolper. The complementation problem for Büchi automata with applications to temporal logic. Theoretical Computer Science, 49(2-3):217-237, 1987. Google Scholar
  15. Aravinda Prasad Sistla. Theoretical issues in the design and verification of distributed systems. Harvard University, 1983. Google Scholar
  16. Wolfgang Thomas, Lukasz Kaiser, and Michael Holtmann. Degrees of lookahead in regular infinite games. Logical Methods in Computer Science, 8, 2012. Google Scholar
  17. Moshe Y Vardi and Pierre Wolper. Automata-theoretic techniques for modal logics of programs. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 32(2):183-221, 1986. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail