Towards a Unified Model of Scholarly Argumentation (Dagstuhl Seminar 22432)

Al-Khatib, Khalid; de Waard, Anita; Freitag, Dayne; Gurevych, Iryna; Hou, Yufang; Scells, Harrisen

doi:10.4230/DagRep.12.10.175

Document

Towards a Unified Model of Scholarly Argumentation (Dagstuhl Seminar 22432)

Authors Khalid Al-Khatib, Anita de Waard, Dayne Freitag, Iryna Gurevych, Yufang Hou, Harrisen Scells and all authors of the abstracts in this report

Part of: Issue: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 12, Issue 10
Part of: Volume: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 12
Part of: Journal: Dagstuhl Reports (DagRep)
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license
Publication Date: 2023-05-03

PDF

File

PDF

DagRep.12.10.175.pdf

Filesize: 3.17 MB
32 pages

Document Identifiers

DOI: 10.4230/DagRep.12.10.175
URN: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-178264

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification

Computing methodologies → Artificial intelligence
Theory of computation
Computing methodologies → Machine learning

Keywords

Argument mining
Argument modeling
Scholarly discourse

Metrics

Access Statistics
Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)

0

PDF Downloads

0

Metadata Views

Abstract

This report summarizes the outcomes of the Dagstuhl Seminar 22432: "Towards a Unified Model of Scholarly Argumentation." The purpose of this Seminar was to enable robust advances in argumentation technology by collecting and collaborating on use cases in scholarly and biomedical discourse and working on a foundational model for argumentation in science and healthcare. Most importantly, the seminar served to develop a multidisciplinary, international research community devoted to building and maintaining principles, tools, and models for studying scholarly argumentation. Over the course of the seminar week, the seminar laid the foundation of a shared formalism, illuminated important scholarly use cases for argumentation modeling, and identified directions for future exploration.

Cite As Get BibTex

Khalid Al-Khatib, Anita de Waard, Dayne Freitag, Iryna Gurevych, Yufang Hou, and Harrisen Scells. Towards a Unified Model of Scholarly Argumentation (Dagstuhl Seminar 22432). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 12, Issue 10, pp. 175-206, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023) https://doi.org/10.4230/DagRep.12.10.175

Author Details

Khalid Al-Khatib

University of Groningen, NL

Anita de Waard

Elsevier - Jericho, US

Dayne Freitag

SRI International, US

Iryna Gurevych

TU Darmstadt, DE

Yufang Hou

IBM Research - Dublin, IE

Harrisen Scells

Universität Leipzig, DE

and all authors of the abstracts in this report

Any Issues?

Feedback on the Current Page

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail