DagRep.12.10.175.pdf
- Filesize: 3.17 MB
- 32 pages
Document
Towards a Unified Model of Scholarly Argumentation (Dagstuhl Seminar 22432)
Authors and all authors of the abstracts in this report
-
Part of:
Issue:
Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 12, Issue 10
Volume: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 12
Journal: Dagstuhl Reports (DagRep) - License:
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license
- Publication Date: 2023-05-03
Cite AsGet BibTex
Khalid Al-Khatib, Anita de Waard, Dayne Freitag, Iryna Gurevych, Yufang Hou, and Harrisen Scells. Towards a Unified Model of Scholarly Argumentation (Dagstuhl Seminar 22432). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 12, Issue 10, pp. 175-206, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)
https://doi.org/10.4230/DagRep.12.10.175
https://doi.org/10.4230/DagRep.12.10.175
Abstract
This report summarizes the outcomes of the Dagstuhl Seminar 22432: "Towards a Unified Model of Scholarly Argumentation." The purpose of this Seminar was to enable robust advances in argumentation technology by collecting and collaborating on use cases in scholarly and biomedical discourse and working on a foundational model for argumentation in science and healthcare. Most importantly, the seminar served to develop a multidisciplinary, international research community devoted to building and maintaining principles, tools, and models for studying scholarly argumentation. Over the course of the seminar week, the seminar laid the foundation of a shared formalism, illuminated important scholarly use cases for argumentation modeling, and identified directions for future exploration.
Subject Classification
ACM Subject Classification
- Computing methodologies → Artificial intelligence
- Theory of computation
- Computing methodologies → Machine learning
Keywords
- Argument mining
- Argument modeling
- Scholarly discourse
Metrics
- Access Statistics
-
Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
0PDF Downloads