DROPS

Document

Automatic Quality Assurance and Release (Dagstuhl Seminar 18122)

Authors: Bram Adams, Benoit Baudry, Sigrid Eldh, and Andy Zaidman

Published in: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 8, Issue 3 (2018)

Abstract

This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 18122 "Automatic Quality Assurance and Release". The main goal of this seminar was to bridge the knowledge divide on how researchers and industry professionals reason about and implement DevOps for automatic quality assurance. Through the seminar, we have built up a common understanding of DevOps tools and practices, but we have also identified major academic and educational challenges for this field of research.

Cite as

Bram Adams, Benoit Baudry, Sigrid Eldh, and Andy Zaidman. Automatic Quality Assurance and Release (Dagstuhl Seminar 18122). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp. 94-127, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@Article{adams_et_al:DagRep.8.3.94,
  author =	{Adams, Bram and Baudry, Benoit and Eldh, Sigrid and Zaidman, Andy},
  title =	{{Automatic Quality Assurance and Release (Dagstuhl Seminar 18122)}},
  pages =	{94--127},
  journal =	{Dagstuhl Reports},
  ISSN =	{2192-5283},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{8},
  number =	{3},
  editor =	{Adams, Bram and Baudry, Benoit and Eldh, Sigrid and Zaidman, Andy},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagRep.8.3.94},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-92994},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagRep.8.3.94},
  annote =	{Keywords: DevOps, automated quality assurance, Continuous Integration, Continuous Deployment, software testing}
}

Document

DOI: 10.4230/DagSemProc.06302.4

Face-off: AOP+LMP vs. legacy software

Authors: Kris De Schutter and Bram Adams

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 6302, Aspects For Legacy Applications (2007)

Abstract

Our presentation relates on a first attempt to see if aspect-oriented programming (AOP) can really help with the revitalisation of legacy business software. By means of four realistic case studies covering reverse engineering, restructuring and integration, we discuss the applicability of the aspect-oriented paradigm in the context of two major programming languages for such environments: Cobol and C. For each case, we consider both advantages and disadvantages.

Cite as

Kris De Schutter and Bram Adams. Face-off: AOP+LMP vs. legacy software. In Aspects For Legacy Applications. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 6302, pp. 1-6, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2007)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{deschutter_et_al:DagSemProc.06302.4,
  author =	{De Schutter, Kris and Adams, Bram},
  title =	{{Face-off: AOP+LMP vs. legacy software}},
  booktitle =	{Aspects For Legacy Applications},
  pages =	{1--6},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2007},
  volume =	{6302},
  editor =	{Siobh\'{a}n Clarke and Leon Moonen and Ganesan Ramalingam},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.06302.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-8886},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.06302.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: AOP, legacy software, reverse-engineering, re-engineering, Cobol, C}
}

Search Results

Documents authored by Adams, Bram

Automatic Quality Assurance and Release (Dagstuhl Seminar 18122)

Abstract

Cite as

Face-off: AOP+LMP vs. legacy software

Abstract

Cite as

Thanks for your feedback!

Could not send message