Search Results

Graph emulators and hopsets are two fundamental concepts for distance approximation. For a given graph G, an (α,β)-emulator is a sparse graph on the same vertex set that preserves the distances of G up to a multiplicative stretch α and additive stretch β. In contrast, an (α,β)-hopset is a set of additional edges that, when added to G, ensures that distances can be approximated up to a multiplicative stretch α, using paths containing at most β edges. When α = 1+ε for arbitrarily small ε > 0, these structures are known as near-additive emulators and near-exact hopsets, respectively. Prior work showed that there is a remarkable similarity between the constructions and guarantees of these two objects. In their survey on this topic, Elkin and Neiman [Bull. EATCS 130, 2020] explicitly asked whether one can obtain a general reduction between near-additive emulators and near-exact hopsets. Following that, Kogan and Parter [FOCS, 2022] provided a general reduction from hopsets to emulators and spanners. In this paper, we address the reverse direction and show that any construction for a near-additive emulator for undirected unweighted graphs can be leveraged as a black box to construct a hopset for an undirected weighted graph with comparable size, stretch, and a hopbound comparable to the emulator’s additive stretch. Specifically, we show that any algorithm that constructs a (1+ε',β)-emulator, with 0 ≤ ε' ≤ 1 and β ≥ 1, of size S_𝒜(n, ε',β), can be used to obtain a (1+ε, O(β²/ε² ln(n/ε)))-hopset of size O((S_𝒜(n + m β/ε², ε/294, β) 1/ε + n) ln(n/ε)), for any 0 < ε ≤ 1. Therefore, our reduction answers the question of Elkin and Neiman [Bull. EATCS 130, 2020] for sparse graphs and further advances the understanding of the formal connection between these two structures. Designing a reduction resulting in a hopset size that does not depend on m remains an intriguing open question.