DROPS

Document

Evaluating ontology alignment methods

Authors: Jerome Euzenat

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 4391, Semantic Interoperability and Integration (2005)

Abstract

Many different methods have been designed for aligning ontologies. These methods use such different techniques that they can hardly be compared theoretically. Hence, it is necessary to compare them on common tests. We present two initiatives that led to the definition and the performance of the evaluation of ontology alignments during 2004. We draw lessons from these two experiments and discuss future improvements.

Cite as

Jerome Euzenat. Evaluating ontology alignment methods. In Semantic Interoperability and Integration. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 4391, pp. 1-8, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2005)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{euzenat:DagSemProc.04391.5,
  author =	{Euzenat, Jerome},
  title =	{{Evaluating ontology alignment methods}},
  booktitle =	{Semantic Interoperability and Integration},
  pages =	{1--8},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2005},
  volume =	{4391},
  editor =	{Y. Kalfoglou and M. Schorlemmer and A. Sheth and S. Staab and M. Uschold},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.04391.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-360},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.04391.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: evaluation , ontology alignment}
}

Search Results

Documents authored by Euzenat, Jerome

Evaluating ontology alignment methods

Abstract

Cite as

Thanks for your feedback!

Could not send message