Search Results

Search patterns of randomly oriented steps of different lengths have been observed on all scales of the biological world, ranging from microscopic to the ecological, including in protein motors, bacteria, T-cells, honeybees, marine predators, and more, see e.g., [Humphries et al., 2010; Jansen et al., 2012; Reynolds et al., 2017; Schuster and Levandowsky, 1996; Humphries et al., 2010; Viswanathan et al., 1996; Viswanathan et al., 1999]. Through different models, it has been demonstrated that adopting a variety in the magnitude of the step lengths can greatly improve the search efficiency. However, the precise connection between the search efficiency and the number of step lengths in the repertoire of the searcher has not been identified. Motivated by biological examples in one-dimensional terrains, a recent paper studied the best cover time on an n-node cycle that can be achieved by a random walk process that uses k step lengths [Boczkowski et al., 2018]. By tuning the lengths and corresponding probabilities the authors therein showed that the best cover time is roughly n^{1+Θ(1/k)}. While this bound is useful for large values of k, it is hardly informative for small k values, which are of interest in biology [Auger-Méthé et al., 2015; Bénichou et al., 2011; Lomholt et al., 2008; {Reynolds}, 2014]. In this paper, we provide a tight bound for the cover time of such a walk, for every integer k> 1. Specifically, up to lower order polylogarithmic factors, the cover time is n^{1+1/(2k-1)}. For k=2,3, 4 and 5 the bound is thus n^{4/3}, n^{6/5}, n^{8/7}, and n^{10/9}, respectively. Informally, our result implies that, as long as the number of step lengths k is not too large, incorporating an additional step length to the repertoire of the process enables to improve the cover time by a polynomial factor, but the extent of the improvement gradually decreases with k.