Search Results

Interest in applying Large Language Models (LLMs), which use natural language processing (NLP) to provide human-like responses to text-based questions, to geospatial tasks has grown rapidly. Research shows that LLMs can help generate software code and answer some types of geographic questions to varying degrees even without fine-tuning. However, further research is required to explore the types of spatial questions they answer correctly, their abilities to apply spatial reasoning, and the variability between models. In this paper we examine the ability of four LLM models (GPT3.5 and 4, LLAma2.0, Falcon40B) to answer spatial questions that range from basic calculations to more advanced geographic concepts. The intent of this comparison is twofold. First, we demonstrate an extensible method for evaluating LLM’s limitations to supporting spatial data science through correct calculations and code generation. Relatedly, we also consider how these models can aid geospatial learning by providing text-based explanations of spatial concepts and operations. Our research shows common strengths in more basic types of questions, and mixed results for questions relating to more advanced spatial concepts. These results provide insights that may be used to inform strategies for testing and fine-tuning these models to increase their understanding of key spatial concepts.