DROPS

Document

Norms and plans as unification criteria for social collectives

Authors: Aldo Gangemi, Jos Lehmann, and Carola Catenacci

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7122, Normative Multi-agent Systems (2007)

Abstract

Based on the formal-ontological paradigm of Constructive Descriptions and Situations, we propose a definition of social collectives that includes social agents, plans, norms, and the conceptual relations between them. We also propose a typology of social collectives, including collection of agents, knowledge community, intentional collective, and intentional normative collective. Our ontology, represented as a first-order theory, provides the expressivity to talk about the contexts (social, informational, circumstantial, and epistemic), in which collectives make and produce sense

Cite as

Aldo Gangemi, Jos Lehmann, and Carola Catenacci. Norms and plans as unification criteria for social collectives. In Normative Multi-agent Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7122, pp. 1-40, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2007)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{gangemi_et_al:DagSemProc.07122.20,
  author =	{Gangemi, Aldo and Lehmann, Jos and Catenacci, Carola},
  title =	{{Norms and plans as unification criteria for social collectives}},
  booktitle =	{Normative Multi-agent Systems},
  pages =	{1--40},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2007},
  volume =	{7122},
  editor =	{Guido Boella and Leon van der Torre and Harko Verhagen},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.07122.20},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-9103},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.07122.20},
  annote =	{Keywords: Formal Ontology, Constructivism, Social Entities, Semantic Web}
}

Search Results

Documents authored by Lehmann, Jos

Norms and plans as unification criteria for social collectives

Abstract

Cite as

Thanks for your feedback!

Could not send message