Search Results

In a 2-dimensional (2D) pattern matching problem, the text is arranged as a matrix 𝖬[1..n, 1..n] and consists of N = n × n symbols drawn from alphabet set Σ of size σ. The query consists of a m × m square matrix 𝖯[1..m, 1..m] drawn from the same alphabet set Σ and the task is to find all the locations in 𝖬 where 𝖯 appears as a (contiguous) submatrix. The patterns can be of any size, but as long as they are square in shape data structures like suffix trees and suffix array exist [Raffaele Giancarlo, 1995; Dong Kyue Kim et al., 1998] for the task of efficient pattern matching. These are essentially 2D counterparts of classic suffix trees and arrays known for traditional 1-dimensional (1D) pattern matching. They work based on linearization of 2D suffixes which would preserve the prefix match property (i.e., every pattern match is a prefix of some suffix). The main limitation of the suffix trees and the suffix arrays (in 1D) was their space utilization of O(N log N) bits, where N is the size of the text. This was suboptimal compared to Nlog σ bits of space, which is information theoretic optimal for the text. With the advent of the field of succinct/compressed data structures, it was possible to develop compressed variants of suffix trees and array based on Burrows-Wheeler Tansform and LF-mapping (or Φ function) [Roberto Grossi and Jeffrey Scott Vitter, 2005; Paolo Ferragina and Giovanni Manzini, 2005; Kunihiko Sadakane, 2007]. These data structures indeed achieve O(N log σ) bits of space or better. This gives rise to the question: analogous to 1D case, can we design a succinct or compressed index for 2D pattern matching? Can there be a 2D compressed suffix tree? Are there analogues of Burrows-Wheeler Transform or LF-mapping? The problem has been acknowledged for over a decade now and there have been a few attempts at applying Φ function [Ankur Gupta, 2004] and achieving entropy based compression [Veli Mäkinen and Gonzalo Navarro, 2008]. However, achieving the complexity breakthrough akin to 1D case has yet to be found. In this paper, we still do not know how to answer suffix array queries in O(N log σ) bits of space - which would have led to efficient pattern matching. However, for the first time, we show an interesting result that it is indeed possible to compute inverse suffix array (ISA) queries in near compact space in O(polylog n) time. Our 2D succinct text index design is based on two 1D compressed suffix trees and it takes O(N log log N + N logσ) bits of space which is much smaller than its naive design that takes O(N log N) bits. Although the main problem is still evasive, this index gives a hope on the existence of a full 2D succinct index with all functionalities similar to that of 1D case.

Two strings are order isomorphic iff the relative ordering of their characters is the same at all positions. For a given text T[1,n] over an ordered alphabet of size σ, we can maintain an order-isomorphic suffix tree/array in O(nlog n) bits and support (order-isomorphic) pattern/substring matching queries efficiently. It is interesting to know if we can encode these structures in space close to the text’s size of nlogσ bits. We answer this question positively by presenting an O(nlog σ)-bit index that allows access to any entry in order-isomorphic suffix array (and its inverse array) in t_{SA} = {O}(log²n/logσ) time. For any pattern P given as a query, this index can count the number of substrings of T that are order-isomorphic to P (denoted by occ) in {O}((|P|logσ+t_{SA})log n) time using standard techniques. Also, it can report the locations of those substrings in additional O(occ ⋅ t_{SA}) time.