Search Results

Documents authored by Shah, Nisarg


Document
Track A: Algorithms, Complexity and Games
Proportionally Fair Clustering Revisited

Authors: Evi Micha and Nisarg Shah

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 168, 47th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2020)


Abstract
In this work, we study fairness in centroid clustering. In this problem, k cluster centers must be placed given n points in a metric space, and the cost to each point is its distance to the nearest cluster center. Recent work of Chen et al. [Chen et al., 2019] introduces the notion of a proportionally fair clustering, in which no group of at least n/k points can find a new cluster center which provides lower cost to each member of the group. They propose a greedy capture algorithm which provides a 1+√2 approximation of proportional fairness for any metric space, and derive generalization bounds for learning proportionally fair clustering from samples in the case where a cluster center can only be placed at one of finitely many given locations in the metric space. We focus on the case where cluster centers can be placed anywhere in the (usually infinite) metric space. In case of the L² distance metric over ℝ^t, we show that the approximation ratio of greedy capture improves to 2. We also show that this is due to a special property of the L² distance; for the L¹ and L^∞ distances, the approximation ratio remains 1+√2. We provide universal lower bounds which apply to all algorithms. We also consider metric spaces defined on graphs. For trees, we show that an exact proportionally fair clustering always exists and provide an efficient algorithm to find one. The corresponding question for general graph remains an interesting open question. Finally, we show that for the L² distance, checking whether a proportionally fair clustering exists and implementing greedy capture over an infinite metric space are NP-hard problems, but (approximately) solvable in special cases. We also derive generalization bounds which show that an approximately proportionally fair clustering for a large number of points can be learned from a small number of samples. Our work advances the understanding of proportional fairness in clustering, and points out many avenues for future work.

Cite as

Evi Micha and Nisarg Shah. Proportionally Fair Clustering Revisited. In 47th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 168, pp. 85:1-85:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{micha_et_al:LIPIcs.ICALP.2020.85,
  author =	{Micha, Evi and Shah, Nisarg},
  title =	{{Proportionally Fair Clustering Revisited}},
  booktitle =	{47th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2020)},
  pages =	{85:1--85:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-138-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{168},
  editor =	{Czumaj, Artur and Dawar, Anuj and Merelli, Emanuela},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2020.85},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-124923},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2020.85},
  annote =	{Keywords: Fairness, Clustering, Facility location}
}
Document
Average Case Analysis of the Classical Algorithm for Markov Decision Processes with Büchi Objectives

Authors: Krishnendu Chatterjee, Manas Joglekar, and Nisarg Shah

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 18, IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2012)


Abstract
We consider Markov decision processes (MDPs) with specifications given as Büchi (liveness) objectives. We consider the problem of computing the set of almost-sure winning vertices from where the objective can be ensured with probability 1. We study for the first time the average case complexity of the classical algorithm for computing the set of almost-sure winning vertices for MDPs with Buchi objectives. Our contributions are as follows: First, we show that for MDPs with constant out-degree the expected number of iterations is at most logarithmic and the average case running time is linear (as compared to the worst case linear number of iterations and quadratic time complexity). Second, for the average case analysis over all MDPs we show that the expected number of iterations is constant and the average case running time is linear (again as compared to the worst case linear number of iterations and quadratic time complexity). Finally we also show that given that all MDPs are equally likely, the probability that the classical algorithm requires more than constant number of iterations is exponentially small.

Cite as

Krishnendu Chatterjee, Manas Joglekar, and Nisarg Shah. Average Case Analysis of the Classical Algorithm for Markov Decision Processes with Büchi Objectives. In IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2012). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 18, pp. 461-473, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2012)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{chatterjee_et_al:LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2012.461,
  author =	{Chatterjee, Krishnendu and Joglekar, Manas and Shah, Nisarg},
  title =	{{Average Case Analysis of the Classical Algorithm for Markov Decision Processes with B\"{u}chi Objectives}},
  booktitle =	{IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2012)},
  pages =	{461--473},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-47-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2012},
  volume =	{18},
  editor =	{D'Souza, Deepak and Radhakrishnan, Jaikumar and Telikepalli, Kavitha},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2012.461},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-38817},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2012.461},
  annote =	{Keywords: MDPs, Buchi objectives, Average case analysis}
}
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail