Search Results

Recent years have seen many algorithmic advances in the area of submodular optimization: (SO) min/max~f(S): S in F, where F is a given family of feasible sets over a ground set V and f:2^V - > R is submodular. This progress has been coupled with a wealth of new applications for these models. Our focus is on a more general class of multi-agent submodular optimization (MASO) min/max Sum_{i=1}^{k} f_i(S_i): S_1 u+ S_2 u+ ... u+ S_k in F. Here we use u+ to denote disjoint union and hence this model is attractive where resources are being allocated across k agents, each with its own submodular cost function f_i(). This was introduced in the minimization setting by Goel et al. In this paper we explore the extent to which the approximability of the multi-agent problems are linked to their single-agent versions, referred to informally as the multi-agent gap. We present different reductions that transform a multi-agent problem into a single-agent one. For minimization, we show that (MASO) has an O(alpha * min{k, log^2 (n)})-approximation whenever (SO) admits an alpha-approximation over the convex formulation. In addition, we discuss the class of "bounded blocker" families where there is a provably tight O(log n) multi-agent gap between (MASO) and (SO). For maximization, we show that monotone (resp. nonmonotone) (MASO) admits an alpha (1-1/e) (resp. alpha * 0.385) approximation whenever monotone (resp. nonmonotone) (SO) admits an alpha-approximation over the multilinear formulation; and the 1-1/e multi-agent gap for monotone objectives is tight. We also discuss several families (such as spanning trees, matroids, and p-systems) that have an (optimal) multi-agent gap of 1. These results substantially expand the family of tractable models for submodular maximization.