Search Results

Documents authored by Souhila Kaci


Document
Representing preferences in the possibilistic setting

Authors: Souhila Kaci, Didier Dubois, and Henri Prade

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 4271, Preferences: Specification, Inference, Applications (2006)


Abstract
The accurate and easy representation of users' preferences in information engineering systems becomes an important issue. Possibility theory provides a generic framework for the qualitative representation of preferences, where several equivalent information formats co- exist (distribution, logical bases, conditionals, graphical networks). Moreover, a bipolar representation distinguishing between positive and negative preferences has been developed in this setting. The paper offers a comprehensive survey of these representation issues.

Cite as

Souhila Kaci, Didier Dubois, and Henri Prade. Representing preferences in the possibilistic setting. In Preferences: Specification, Inference, Applications. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 4271, pp. 1-9, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2006)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{souhilakaci_et_al:DagSemProc.04271.9,
  author =	{Souhila Kaci and Dubois, Didier and Prade, Henri},
  title =	{{Representing preferences in the possibilistic setting}},
  booktitle =	{Preferences: Specification, Inference, Applications},
  pages =	{1--9},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2006},
  volume =	{4271},
  editor =	{Gianni Bosi and Ronen I. Brafman and Jan Chomicki and Werner Kie{\ss}ling},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.04271.9},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-4063},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.04271.9},
  annote =	{Keywords: Possibility, preference, possibilistic logic}
}
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail