2 Search Results for "Arming, Sebastian"

Document
Invited Paper
DOI: 10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.5
Inconsistency-Tolerant Semantics Based on (Preferred) Repairs (Invited Paper)

Authors: Camille Bourgaux

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 138, Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025)

Abstract
Real-world datasets are plagued by data quality issues which may render the data inconsistent w.r.t. a set of constraints, be they given by database integrity constraints or ontologies. A prominent way to handle such inconsistent data is to use inconsistency-tolerant semantics to obtain meaningful answers to queries. Most of these semantics are based on some notion of repairs, which represent ways of restoring the data consistency. The most basic kind of repairs is that of subset repairs, which are maximal consistent subsets of the dataset. However, in many scenarios, one can define preferred repairs based on some preference information. These lecture notes present inconsistency-tolerant semantics, focusing on the repair-based ones, then review different kinds of preferred repairs that have been considered in the literature. We present in particular the relationships between different kinds of preferred repairs and other notions related to inconsistency handling, the computational complexity of reasoning with (preferred) repairs, and some implementations.
Cite as

Camille Bourgaux. Inconsistency-Tolerant Semantics Based on (Preferred) Repairs (Invited Paper). In Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 & RW 2025). Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 138, pp. 5:1-5:67, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bourgaux:OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.5,
  author =	{Bourgaux, Camille},
  title =	{{Inconsistency-Tolerant Semantics Based on (Preferred) Repairs}},
  booktitle =	{Joint Proceedings of the 20th and 21st Reasoning Web Summer Schools (RW 2024 \& RW 2025)},
  pages =	{5:1--5:67},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-405-5},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{138},
  editor =	{Artale, Alessandro and Bienvenu, Meghyn and Garc{\'\i}a, Yazm{\'\i}n Ib\'{a}\~{n}ez and Murlak, Filip},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.5},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-250504},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.RW.2024/2025.5},
  annote =	{Keywords: Knowledge bases, databases, inconsistency handling, repairs, preferences}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2016.21
Complexity of Repair Checking and Consistent Query Answering

Authors: Sebastian Arming, Reinhard Pichler, and Emanuel Sallinger

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 48, 19th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2016)

Abstract
Inconsistent databases (i.e., databases violating some given set of integrity constraints) may arise in many applications such as, for instance, data integration. Hence, the handling of inconsistent data has evolved as an active field of research. In this paper, we consider two fundamental problems in this context: Repair Checking (RC) and Consistent Query Answering (CQA). So far, these problems have been mainly studied from the point of view of data complexity (where all parts of the input except for the database are considered as fixed). While for some kinds of integrity constraints, also combined complexity (where all parts of the input are allowed to vary) has been considered, for several other kinds of integrity constraints, combined complexity has been left unexplored. Moreover, a more detailed analysis (keeping other parts of the input fixed - e.g., the constraints only) is completely missing. The goal of our work is a thorough analysis of the complexity of the RC and CQA problems. Our contribution is a complete picture of the complexity of these problems for a wide range of integrity constraints. Our analysis thus allows us to get a better understanding of the true sources of complexity.
Cite as

Sebastian Arming, Reinhard Pichler, and Emanuel Sallinger. Complexity of Repair Checking and Consistent Query Answering. In 19th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2016). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 48, pp. 21:1-21:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2016)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{arming_et_al:LIPIcs.ICDT.2016.21,
  author =	{Arming, Sebastian and Pichler, Reinhard and Sallinger, Emanuel},
  title =	{{Complexity of Repair Checking and Consistent Query Answering}},
  booktitle =	{19th International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT 2016)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:18},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-002-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2016},
  volume =	{48},
  editor =	{Martens, Wim and Zeume, Thomas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2016.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-57900},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ICDT.2016.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: inconsistency, consistent query answering, complexity}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 2 Document/PDF
  • 1 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2025
  • 1 2016

  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Arming, Sebastian
  • 1 Bourgaux, Camille
  • 1 Pichler, Reinhard
  • 1 Sallinger, Emanuel

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 1 LIPIcs
  • 1 OASIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Description logics
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Nonmonotonic, default reasoning and belief revision
  • 1 Computing methodologies → Reasoning about belief and knowledge
  • 1 Information systems → Data cleaning
  • 1 Theory of computation → Automated reasoning

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Knowledge bases
  • 1 complexity
  • 1 consistent query answering
  • 1 databases
  • 1 inconsistency
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact