4 Search Results for "Daian, Eli"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.4
A Hierarchy of Unrestricted Deterministic Objects with Consensus Number 1

Authors: Warren Zhu

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 361, 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)

Abstract
The consensus number of a shared object is the maximum number of processes that can solve consensus in a wait-free manner using copies of the object and registers. In 2016, to prove that an object is not fully characterized by its consensus number, Afek, Ellen and Gafni showed that for all integers n ≥ 2, there exists an infinite sequence of deterministic objects of consensus number n with strictly increasing computational power. In 2018, Daian, Losa, Afek, and Gafni constructed an infinite sequence of deterministic objects of consensus number 1 with strictly decreasing computational power, but the single operation that each of these objects supports is restricted in how it can be used during an execution. As restrictions can have an effect on an object’s consensus number, it was left as an open question whether the same result holds without this restriction. In this paper, we construct an infinite sequence of unrestricted deterministic objects with strictly decreasing computational power. All objects in this sequence have consensus number 1.
Cite as

Warren Zhu. A Hierarchy of Unrestricted Deterministic Objects with Consensus Number 1. In 29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 361, pp. 4:1-4:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{zhu:LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.4,
  author =	{Zhu, Warren},
  title =	{{A Hierarchy of Unrestricted Deterministic Objects with Consensus Number 1}},
  booktitle =	{29th International Conference on Principles of Distributed Systems (OPODIS 2025)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-409-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2026},
  volume =	{361},
  editor =	{Arusoaie, Andrei and Onica, Emanuel and Spear, Michael and Tucci-Piergiovanni, Sara},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251778},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.OPODIS.2025.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Shared Memory, Wait-free, Set Agreement, Consensus Hierarchy}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.18
From Permissioned to Proof-of-Stake Consensus

Authors: Jovan Komatovic, Andrew Lewis-Pye, Joachim Neu, Tim Roughgarden, and Ertem Nusret Tas

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 354, 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)

Abstract
This paper presents the first generic compiler that transforms any permissioned consensus protocol into a proof-of-stake permissionless consensus protocol. For each of the following properties, if the initial permissioned protocol satisfies that property in the partially synchronous setting, the consequent proof-of-stake protocol also satisfies that property in the partially synchronous and quasi-permissionless setting (with the same fault-tolerance): consistency; liveness; optimistic responsiveness; every composable log-specific property; and message complexity of a given order. Moreover, our transformation ensures that the output protocol satisfies accountability (identifying culprits in the event of a consistency violation), whether or not the original permissioned protocol satisfied it.
Cite as

Jovan Komatovic, Andrew Lewis-Pye, Joachim Neu, Tim Roughgarden, and Ertem Nusret Tas. From Permissioned to Proof-of-Stake Consensus. In 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 354, pp. 18:1-18:26, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{komatovic_et_al:LIPIcs.AFT.2025.18,
  author =	{Komatovic, Jovan and Lewis-Pye, Andrew and Neu, Joachim and Roughgarden, Tim and Tas, Ertem Nusret},
  title =	{{From Permissioned to Proof-of-Stake Consensus}},
  booktitle =	{7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)},
  pages =	{18:1--18:26},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-400-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{354},
  editor =	{Avarikioti, Zeta and Christin, Nicolas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.18},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-247373},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.18},
  annote =	{Keywords: Permissioned Consensus, Proof-of-Stake, generic Compiler, Blockchain}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.17
Fully-Fluctuating Participation in Sleepy Consensus

Authors: Yuval Efron, Joachim Neu, and Toniann Pitassi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 354, 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)

Abstract
Proof-of-work allows Bitcoin to boast security amidst arbitrary fluctuations in participation of miners throughout time, so long as, at any point in time, a majority of hash power is honest. In recent years, however, the pendulum has shifted in favor of proof-of-stake-based consensus protocols. There, the sleepy model is the most prominent model for handling fluctuating participation of nodes. However, to date, no protocol in the sleepy model rivals Bitcoin in its robustness to drastic fluctuations in participation levels, with state-of-the-art protocols making various restrictive assumptions. In this work, we present a new adversary model, called external adversary. Intuitively, in our model, corrupt nodes do not divulge information about their secret keys. In this model, we show that protocols in the sleepy model can meaningfully claim to remain secure against fully fluctuating participation, without compromising efficiency or corruption resilience. Our adversary model is quite natural, and arguably naturally captures the process via which malicious behavior arises in protocols, as opposed to traditional worst-case modeling. On top of which, the model is also theoretically appealing, circumventing a barrier established in a recent work of Malkhi, Momose, and Ren.
Cite as

Yuval Efron, Joachim Neu, and Toniann Pitassi. Fully-Fluctuating Participation in Sleepy Consensus. In 7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 354, pp. 17:1-17:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{efron_et_al:LIPIcs.AFT.2025.17,
  author =	{Efron, Yuval and Neu, Joachim and Pitassi, Toniann},
  title =	{{Fully-Fluctuating Participation in Sleepy Consensus}},
  booktitle =	{7th Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies (AFT 2025)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-400-0},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{354},
  editor =	{Avarikioti, Zeta and Christin, Nicolas},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-247362},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.AFT.2025.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: Sleepy Consensus, fully-fluctuating dynamic Participation}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2018.17
A Wealth of Sub-Consensus Deterministic Objects

Authors: Eli Daian, Giuliano Losa, Yehuda Afek, and Eli Gafni

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 121, 32nd International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2018)

Abstract
The consensus hierarchy classifies shared an object according to its consensus number, which is the maximum number of processes that can solve consensus wait-free using the object. The question of whether this hierarchy is precise enough to fully characterize the synchronization power of deterministic shared objects was open until 2016, when Afek et al. showed that there is an infinite hierarchy of deterministic objects, each weaker than the next, which is strictly between i and i+1-processors consensus, for i >= 2. For i=1, the question whether there exist a deterministic object whose power is strictly between read-write and 2-processors consensus, remained open. We resolve the question positively by exhibiting an infinite hierarchy of simple deterministic objects which are equivalent to set-consensus tasks, and thus are stronger than read-write registers, but they cannot implement consensus for two processes. Still our paper leaves a gap with open questions.
Cite as

Eli Daian, Giuliano Losa, Yehuda Afek, and Eli Gafni. A Wealth of Sub-Consensus Deterministic Objects. In 32nd International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 121, pp. 17:1-17:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{daian_et_al:LIPIcs.DISC.2018.17,
  author =	{Daian, Eli and Losa, Giuliano and Afek, Yehuda and Gafni, Eli},
  title =	{{A Wealth of Sub-Consensus Deterministic Objects}},
  booktitle =	{32nd International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2018)},
  pages =	{17:1--17:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-092-7},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{121},
  editor =	{Schmid, Ulrich and Widder, Josef},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2018.17},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-98061},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.DISC.2018.17},
  annote =	{Keywords: shared memory, distributed algorithms, wait-free, set consensus}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 4 Document/PDF
  • 3 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2026
  • 2 2025
  • 1 2018

  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Neu, Joachim
  • 1 Afek, Yehuda
  • 1 Daian, Eli
  • 1 Efron, Yuval
  • 1 Gafni, Eli
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 4 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 2 Security and privacy → Distributed systems security
  • 2 Theory of computation → Distributed algorithms
  • 2 Theory of computation → Distributed computing models

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Blockchain
  • 1 Consensus Hierarchy
  • 1 Permissioned Consensus
  • 1 Proof-of-Stake
  • 1 Set Agreement
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact