7 Search Results for "Katsikarelis, Ioannis"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.8
Binary k-Center with Missing Entries: Structure Leads to Tractability

Authors: Tobias Friedrich, Kirill Simonov, and Farehe Soheil

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 358, 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)

Abstract
k-Center clustering is a fundamental classification problem, where the task is to categorize the given collection of entities into k clusters and come up with a representative for each cluster, so that the maximum distance between an entity and its representative is minimized. In this work, we focus on the setting where the entities are represented by binary vectors with missing entries, which model incomplete categorical data. This version of the problem has wide applications, from predictive analytics to bioinformatics. Our main finding is that the problem, which is notoriously hard from the classical complexity viewpoint, becomes tractable as soon as the known entries are sparse and exhibit a certain structure. Formally, we show fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for the parameters vertex cover, fracture number, and treewidth of the row-column graph, which encodes the positions of the known entries of the matrix. Additionally, we tie the complexity of the 1-cluster variant of the problem, which is famous under the name Closest String, to the complexity of solving integer linear programs with few constraints. This implies, in particular, that improving upon the running times of our algorithms would lead to more efficient algorithms for integer linear programming in general.
Cite as

Tobias Friedrich, Kirill Simonov, and Farehe Soheil. Binary k-Center with Missing Entries: Structure Leads to Tractability. In 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 358, pp. 8:1-8:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{friedrich_et_al:LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.8,
  author =	{Friedrich, Tobias and Simonov, Kirill and Soheil, Farehe},
  title =	{{Binary k-Center with Missing Entries: Structure Leads to Tractability}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)},
  pages =	{8:1--8:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-407-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{358},
  editor =	{Agrawal, Akanksha and van Leeuwen, Erik Jan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.8},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251403},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.8},
  annote =	{Keywords: Clustering, Missing Entries, k-Center, Parameterized Algorithms}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.19
Tight Bounds for Connected Odd Cycle Transversal Parameterized by Clique-Width

Authors: Narek Bojikian and Stefan Kratsch

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 358, 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)

Abstract
Recently, Bojikian and Kratsch [ICALP 2024] presented a novel approach to tackle connectivity problems parameterized by clique-width (cw), based on counting (modulo 2) the number of representations of partial solutions, while allowing for possibly multiple representations to exist for the same partial solution. Using this technique, they got a SETH-tight bound of 𝒪^*(3^{cw}) for the Steiner Tree problem, which was left open by Hegerfeld and Kratsch [ESA 2023]. We use the same technique to solve the Connected Odd Cycle Transversal problem in time 𝒪^*(12^{cw}). Moreover, we prove that our result is tight by providing a SETH-based lower bound excluding algorithms with running time 𝒪^*((12-ε)^{cw}). This answers another question of Hegerfeld and Kratsch [ESA 2023].
Cite as

Narek Bojikian and Stefan Kratsch. Tight Bounds for Connected Odd Cycle Transversal Parameterized by Clique-Width. In 20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 358, pp. 19:1-19:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bojikian_et_al:LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.19,
  author =	{Bojikian, Narek and Kratsch, Stefan},
  title =	{{Tight Bounds for Connected Odd Cycle Transversal Parameterized by Clique-Width}},
  booktitle =	{20th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation (IPEC 2025)},
  pages =	{19:1--19:15},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-407-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{358},
  editor =	{Agrawal, Akanksha and van Leeuwen, Erik Jan},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.19},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-251516},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2025.19},
  annote =	{Keywords: Parameterized complexity, connected odd cycle transversal, clique-width}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.13
Tight Bounds for Some Classical Problems Parameterized by Cutwidth

Authors: Narek Bojikian, Vera Chekan, and Stefan Kratsch

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 351, 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)

Abstract
Cutwidth is a widely studied parameter and it quantifies how well a graph can be decomposed along small edge-cuts. It complements pathwidth, which captures decomposition by small vertex separators, and it is well-known that cutwidth upper-bounds pathwidth. The SETH-tight parameterized complexity of problems on graphs of bounded pathwidth (and treewidth) has been actively studied over the past decade while for cutwidth the complexity of many classical problems remained open. For Hamiltonian Cycle, it is known that a (2+√2)^{pw} n^𝒪(1) algorithm is optimal for pathwidth under SETH [Cygan et al. JACM 2018]. Van Geffen et al. [J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 2020] and Bojikian et al. [STACS 2023] asked which running time is optimal for this problem parameterized by cutwidth. We answer this question with (1+√2)^{ctw} n^𝒪(1) by providing matching upper and lower bounds. Second, as our main technical contribution, we close the gap left by van Heck [2018] for Partition Into Triangles (and Triangle Packing) by improving both upper and lower bound and getting a tight bound of ∛{3}^{ctw} n^𝒪(1), which to our knowledge exhibits the only known tight non-integral basis apart from Hamiltonian Cycle [Cygan et al. JACM 2018] and C₄-Hitting Set [SODA 2025]. We show that the cuts inducing a disjoint union of paths of length three (unions of so-called Z-cuts) lie at the core of the complexity of the problem - usually lower-bound constructions use simpler cuts inducing either a matching or a disjoint union of bicliques. Finally, we determine the optimal running times for Max Cut (2^{ctw} n^𝒪(1)) and Induced Matching (3^{ctw} n^𝒪(1)) by providing matching lower bounds for the existing algorithms - the latter result also answers an open question for treewidth by Chaudhary and Zehavi [WG 2023].
Cite as

Narek Bojikian, Vera Chekan, and Stefan Kratsch. Tight Bounds for Some Classical Problems Parameterized by Cutwidth. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 13:1-13:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bojikian_et_al:LIPIcs.ESA.2025.13,
  author =	{Bojikian, Narek and Chekan, Vera and Kratsch, Stefan},
  title =	{{Tight Bounds for Some Classical Problems Parameterized by Cutwidth}},
  booktitle =	{33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025)},
  pages =	{13:1--13:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-395-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{351},
  editor =	{Benoit, Anne and Kaplan, Haim and Wild, Sebastian and Herman, Grzegorz},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.13},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-244815},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.13},
  annote =	{Keywords: Parameterized complexity, cutwidth, Hamiltonian cycle, triangle packing, max cut, induced matching}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.44
Independence and Domination on Bounded-Treewidth Graphs: Integer, Rational, and Irrational Distances

Authors: Tim A. Hartmann and Dániel Marx

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 327, 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)

Abstract
The distance-d variants of Independent Set and Dominating Set problems have been extensively studied from different algorithmic viewpoints. In particular, the complexity of these problems are well understood on bounded-treewidth graphs [Katsikarelis, Lampis, and Paschos, Discret. Appl. Math 2022][Borradaile and Le, IPEC 2016]: given a tree decomposition of width t, the two problems can be solved in time d^t⋅ n^O(1) and (2d+1)^t⋅ n^O(1), respectively. Furthermore, assuming the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH), the base constants are best possible in these running times: they cannot be improved to d-ε and 2d+1-ε, respectively, for any ε > 0. We investigate continuous versions of these problems in a setting introduced by Megiddo and Tamir [SICOMP 1983], where every edge is modeled by a unit-length interval of points. In the δ-Dispersion problem, the task is to find a maximum number of points (possibly inside edges) that are pairwise at distance at least δ from each other. Similarly, in the δ-Covering problem, the task is to find a minimum number of points (possibly inside edges) such that every point of the graph (including those inside edges) is at distance at most δ from the selected point set. We provide a comprehensive understanding of these two problems on bounded-treewidth graphs. 1) Let δ = a/b with a and b being coprime. If a ≤ 2, then δ-Dispersion is polynomial-time solvable. For a ≥ 3, given a tree decomposition of width t, the problem can be solved in time (2a)^t⋅ n^O(1), and, assuming SETH, there is no (2a-ε)^t⋅n^{O(1)} time algorithm for any ε > 0. 2) Let δ = a/b with a and b being coprime. If a = 1, then δ-Covering is polynomial-time solvable. For a ≥ 2, given a tree decomposition of width t, the problem can be solved in time ((2+2(bod 2)) a)^t⋅ n^O(1), and, assuming SETH, there is no ((2+2(bod 2))a -ε)^t⋅n^O(1) time algorithm for any ε > 0. 3) For every fixed irrational number δ > 0 satisfying some mild computability condition, both δ-Dispersion and δ-Covering can be solved in time n^O(t) on graphs of treewidth t. We show a very explicitly defined irrational number δ = (4∑_{j=1}^∞ 2^{-2^j})^{-1} ≈ 0.790085 such that δ-Dispersion and δ/2-Covering are W[1]-hard parameterized by the treewidth t of the input graph, and, assuming ETH, cannot be solved in time f(t)⋅n^o(t). As a key step in obtaining these results, we extend earlier results on distance-d versions of Independent Set and Dominating Set: We determine the exact complexity of these problems in the special case when the input graph arises from some graph G' by subdividing every edge exactly b times.
Cite as

Tim A. Hartmann and Dániel Marx. Independence and Domination on Bounded-Treewidth Graphs: Integer, Rational, and Irrational Distances. In 42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 327, pp. 44:1-44:19, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hartmann_et_al:LIPIcs.STACS.2025.44,
  author =	{Hartmann, Tim A. and Marx, D\'{a}niel},
  title =	{{Independence and Domination on Bounded-Treewidth Graphs: Integer, Rational, and Irrational Distances}},
  booktitle =	{42nd International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2025)},
  pages =	{44:1--44:19},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-365-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{327},
  editor =	{Beyersdorff, Olaf and Pilipczuk, Micha{\l} and Pimentel, Elaine and Thắng, Nguy\~{ê}n Kim},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.44},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-228700},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2025.44},
  annote =	{Keywords: Independence, Domination, Irrationals, Treewidth, SETH}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2018.67
New Results on Directed Edge Dominating Set

Authors: Rémy Belmonte, Tesshu Hanaka, Ioannis Katsikarelis, Eun Jung Kim, and Michael Lampis

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 117, 43rd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2018)

Abstract
We study a family of generalizations of Edge Dominating Set on directed graphs called Directed (p,q)-Edge Dominating Set. In this problem an arc (u,v) is said to dominate itself, as well as all arcs which are at distance at most q from v, or at distance at most p to u. First, we give significantly improved FPT algorithms for the two most important cases of the problem, (0,1)-dEDS and (1,1)-dEDS (that correspond to versions of Dominating Set on line graphs), as well as polynomial kernels. We also improve the best-known approximation for these cases from logarithmic to constant. In addition, we show that (p,q)-dEDS is FPT parameterized by p+q+tw, but W-hard parameterized just by tw, where tw is the treewidth of the underlying graph of the input. We then go on to focus on the complexity of the problem on tournaments. Here, we provide a complete classification for every possible fixed value of p,q, which shows that the problem exhibits a surprising behavior, including cases which are in P; cases which are solvable in quasi-polynomial time but not in P; and a single case (p=q=1) which is NP-hard (under randomized reductions) and cannot be solved in sub-exponential time, under standard assumptions.
Cite as

Rémy Belmonte, Tesshu Hanaka, Ioannis Katsikarelis, Eun Jung Kim, and Michael Lampis. New Results on Directed Edge Dominating Set. In 43rd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 117, pp. 67:1-67:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{belmonte_et_al:LIPIcs.MFCS.2018.67,
  author =	{Belmonte, R\'{e}my and Hanaka, Tesshu and Katsikarelis, Ioannis and Kim, Eun Jung and Lampis, Michael},
  title =	{{New Results on Directed Edge Dominating Set}},
  booktitle =	{43rd International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2018)},
  pages =	{67:1--67:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-086-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{117},
  editor =	{Potapov, Igor and Spirakis, Paul and Worrell, James},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2018.67},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-96490},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2018.67},
  annote =	{Keywords: Edge Dominating Set, Tournaments, Treewidth}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2018.24
Parameterized Orientable Deletion

Authors: Tesshu Hanaka, Ioannis Katsikarelis, Michael Lampis, Yota Otachi, and Florian Sikora

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 101, 16th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2018)

Abstract
A graph is d-orientable if its edges can be oriented so that the maximum in-degree of the resulting digraph is at most d. d-orientability is a well-studied concept with close connections to fundamental graph-theoretic notions and applications as a load balancing problem. In this paper we consider the d-Orientable Deletion problem: given a graph G=(V,E), delete the minimum number of vertices to make G d-orientable. We contribute a number of results that improve the state of the art on this problem. Specifically: - We show that the problem is W[2]-hard and log n-inapproximable with respect to k, the number of deleted vertices. This closes the gap in the problem's approximability. - We completely characterize the parameterized complexity of the problem on chordal graphs: it is FPT parameterized by d+k, but W-hard for each of the parameters d,k separately. - We show that, under the SETH, for all d,epsilon, the problem does not admit a (d+2-epsilon)^{tw}, algorithm where tw is the graph's treewidth, resolving as a special case an open problem on the complexity of PseudoForest Deletion. - We show that the problem is W-hard parameterized by the input graph's clique-width. Complementing this, we provide an algorithm running in time d^{O(d * cw)}, showing that the problem is FPT by d+cw, and improving the previously best know algorithm for this case.
Cite as

Tesshu Hanaka, Ioannis Katsikarelis, Michael Lampis, Yota Otachi, and Florian Sikora. Parameterized Orientable Deletion. In 16th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 101, pp. 24:1-24:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{hanaka_et_al:LIPIcs.SWAT.2018.24,
  author =	{Hanaka, Tesshu and Katsikarelis, Ioannis and Lampis, Michael and Otachi, Yota and Sikora, Florian},
  title =	{{Parameterized Orientable Deletion}},
  booktitle =	{16th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2018)},
  pages =	{24:1--24:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-068-2},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{101},
  editor =	{Eppstein, David},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2018.24},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-88506},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2018.24},
  annote =	{Keywords: Graph orientations, FPT algorithms, Treewidth, SETH}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2017.50
Structural Parameters, Tight Bounds, and Approximation for (k,r)-Center

Authors: Ioannis Katsikarelis, Michael Lampis, and Vangelis Th. Paschos

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 92, 28th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2017)

Abstract
In (k,r)-Center we are given a (possibly edge-weighted) graph and are asked to select at most k vertices (centers), so that all other vertices are at distance at most r from a center. In this paper we provide a number of tight fine-grained bounds on the complexity of this problem with respect to various standard graph parameters. Specifically: - For any r>=1, we show an algorithm that solves the problem in O*((3r+1)^cw) time, where cw is the clique-width of the input graph, as well as a tight SETH lower bound matching this algorithm's performance. As a corollary, for r=1, this closes the gap that previously existed on the complexity of Dominating Set parameterized by cw. - We strengthen previously known FPT lower bounds, by showing that (k,r)-Center is W[1]-hard parameterized by the input graph's vertex cover (if edge weights are allowed), or feedback vertex set, even if k is an additional parameter. Our reductions imply tight ETH-based lower bounds. Finally, we devise an algorithm parameterized by vertex cover for unweighted graphs. - We show that the complexity of the problem parameterized by tree-depth is 2^Theta(td^2) by showing an algorithm of this complexity and a tight ETH-based lower bound. We complement these mostly negative results by providing FPT approximation schemes parameterized by clique-width or treewidth which work efficiently independently of the values of k,r. In particular, we give algorithms which, for any epsilon>0, run in time O*((tw/epsilon)^O(tw)), O*((cw/epsilon)^O(cw)) and return a (k,(1+epsilon)r)-center, if a (k,r)-center exists, thus circumventing the problem's W-hardness.
Cite as

Ioannis Katsikarelis, Michael Lampis, and Vangelis Th. Paschos. Structural Parameters, Tight Bounds, and Approximation for (k,r)-Center. In 28th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2017). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 92, pp. 50:1-50:13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{katsikarelis_et_al:LIPIcs.ISAAC.2017.50,
  author =	{Katsikarelis, Ioannis and Lampis, Michael and Paschos, Vangelis Th.},
  title =	{{Structural Parameters, Tight Bounds, and Approximation for (k,r)-Center}},
  booktitle =	{28th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2017)},
  pages =	{50:1--50:13},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-054-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2017},
  volume =	{92},
  editor =	{Okamoto, Yoshio and Tokuyama, Takeshi},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2017.50},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-82441},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2017.50},
  annote =	{Keywords: FPT algorithms, Approximation, Treewidth, Clique-width, Domination}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 7 Document/PDF
  • 4 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 4 2025
  • 2 2018
  • 1 2017

  • Refine by Author
  • 3 Katsikarelis, Ioannis
  • 3 Lampis, Michael
  • 2 Bojikian, Narek
  • 2 Hanaka, Tesshu
  • 2 Kratsch, Stefan
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 7 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 5 Theory of computation → Parameterized complexity and exact algorithms
  • 2 Mathematics of computing → Graph algorithms
  • 1 Theory of computation → Discrete optimization
  • 1 Theory of computation → Fixed parameter tractability
  • 1 Theory of computation → Problems, reductions and completeness

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 4 Treewidth
  • 2 Domination
  • 2 FPT algorithms
  • 2 Parameterized complexity
  • 2 SETH
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact