5 Search Results for "Sakaguchi, Kazuhiko"

Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.1
A Certified Proof Checker for Deep Neural Network Verification in Imandra

Authors: Remi Desmartin, Omri Isac, Grant Passmore, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Kathrin Stark, and Guy Katz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 352, 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)

Abstract
Recent advances in the verification of deep neural networks (DNNs) have opened the way for a broader usage of DNN verification technology in many application areas, including safety-critical ones. However, DNN verifiers are themselves complex programs that have been shown to be susceptible to errors and numerical imprecision; this, in turn, has raised the question of trust in DNN verifiers. One prominent attempt to address this issue is enhancing DNN verifiers with the capability of producing certificates of their results that are subject to independent algorithmic checking. While formulations of Marabou certificate checking already exist on top of the state-of-the-art DNN verifier Marabou, they are implemented in C++, and that code itself raises the question of trust (e.g., in the precision of floating point calculations or guarantees for implementation soundness). Here, we present an alternative implementation of the Marabou certificate checking in Imandra - an industrial functional programming language and an interactive theorem prover (ITP) - that allows us to obtain full proof of certificate correctness. The significance of the result is two-fold. Firstly, it gives stronger independent guarantees for Marabou proofs. Secondly, it opens the way for the wider adoption of DNN verifiers in interactive theorem proving in the same way as many ITPs already incorporate SMT solvers.
Cite as

Remi Desmartin, Omri Isac, Grant Passmore, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Kathrin Stark, and Guy Katz. A Certified Proof Checker for Deep Neural Network Verification in Imandra. In 16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 352, pp. 1:1-1:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{desmartin_et_al:LIPIcs.ITP.2025.1,
  author =	{Desmartin, Remi and Isac, Omri and Passmore, Grant and Komendantskaya, Ekaterina and Stark, Kathrin and Katz, Guy},
  title =	{{A Certified Proof Checker for Deep Neural Network Verification in Imandra}},
  booktitle =	{16th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2025)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-396-6},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{352},
  editor =	{Forster, Yannick and Keller, Chantal},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-246000},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2025.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Neural Network Verification, Farkas Lemma, Proof Certification}
}
Document
Invited Talk
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.2
Vehicle: Bridging the Embedding Gap in the Verification of Neuro-Symbolic Programs (Invited Talk)

Authors: Matthew L. Daggitt, Wen Kokke, Robert Atkey, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Natalia Slusarz, and Luca Arnaboldi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 337, 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)

Abstract
Neuro-symbolic programs, i.e. programs containing both machine learning components and traditional symbolic code, are becoming increasingly widespread. Finding a general methodology for verifying such programs is challenging due to both the number of different tools involved and the intricate interface between the "neural" and "symbolic" program components. In this paper we present a general decomposition of the neuro-symbolic verification problem into parts, and examine the problem of the embedding gap that occurs when one tries to combine proofs about the neural and symbolic components. To address this problem we then introduce Vehicle - standing as an abbreviation for a "verification condition language" - an intermediate programming language interface between machine learning frameworks, automated theorem provers, and dependently-typed formalisations of neuro-symbolic programs. Vehicle allows users to specify the properties of the neural components of neuro-symbolic programs once, and then safely compile the specification to each interface using a tailored typing and compilation procedure. We give a high-level overview of Vehicle’s overall design, its interfaces and compilation & type-checking procedures, and then demonstrate its utility by formally verifying the safety of a simple autonomous car controlled by a neural network, operating in a stochastic environment with imperfect information.
Cite as

Matthew L. Daggitt, Wen Kokke, Robert Atkey, Ekaterina Komendantskaya, Natalia Slusarz, and Luca Arnaboldi. Vehicle: Bridging the Embedding Gap in the Verification of Neuro-Symbolic Programs (Invited Talk). In 10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 337, pp. 2:1-2:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{daggitt_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.2,
  author =	{Daggitt, Matthew L. and Kokke, Wen and Atkey, Robert and Komendantskaya, Ekaterina and Slusarz, Natalia and Arnaboldi, Luca},
  title =	{{Vehicle: Bridging the Embedding Gap in the Verification of Neuro-Symbolic Programs}},
  booktitle =	{10th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2025)},
  pages =	{2:1--2:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-374-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2025},
  volume =	{337},
  editor =	{Fern\'{a}ndez, Maribel},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.2},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-236172},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2025.2},
  annote =	{Keywords: Neural Network Verification, Types, Interactive Theorem Provers}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2022.4
Use and Abuse of Instance Parameters in the Lean Mathematical Library

Authors: Anne Baanen

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 237, 13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022)

Abstract
The Lean mathematical library mathlib features extensive use of the typeclass pattern for organising mathematical structures, based on Lean’s mechanism of instance parameters. Related mechanisms for typeclasses are available in other provers including Agda, Coq and Isabelle with varying degrees of adoption. This paper analyses representative examples of design patterns involving instance parameters in the current Lean 3 version of mathlib, focussing on complications arising at scale and how the mathlib community deals with them.
Cite as

Anne Baanen. Use and Abuse of Instance Parameters in the Lean Mathematical Library. In 13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 237, pp. 4:1-4:20, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{baanen:LIPIcs.ITP.2022.4,
  author =	{Baanen, Anne},
  title =	{{Use and Abuse of Instance Parameters in the Lean Mathematical Library}},
  booktitle =	{13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022)},
  pages =	{4:1--4:20},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-252-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{237},
  editor =	{Andronick, June and de Moura, Leonardo},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2022.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-167131},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2022.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: formalization of mathematics, dependent type theory, typeclasses, algebraic hierarchy, Lean prover}
}
Document
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2022.29
Reflexive Tactics for Algebra, Revisited

Authors: Kazuhiko Sakaguchi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 237, 13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022)

Abstract
Computational reflection allows us to turn verified decision procedures into efficient automated reasoning tools in proof assistants. The typical applications of such methodology include decidable algebraic theories such as equational theories of commutative rings and lattices. However, such existing tools are known not to cooperate with packed classes, a methodology to define mathematical structures in dependent type theory, that allows for the sharing of vocabulary across the inheritance hierarchy. Moreover, such tools do not support homomorphisms whose domain and codomain types may differ. This paper demonstrates how to implement reflexive tactics that support packed classes and homomorphisms. As applications of our methodology, we adapt the ring and field tactics of Coq to the commutative ring and field structures of the Mathematical Components library, and apply the resulting tactics to the formal proof of the irrationality of ζ(3) by Chyzak, Mahboubi, and Sibut-Pinote. As a result, the lines of code in the proof scripts have been reduced by 8%, and the time required for proof checking has been decreased by 27%.
Cite as

Kazuhiko Sakaguchi. Reflexive Tactics for Algebra, Revisited. In 13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 237, pp. 29:1-29:22, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sakaguchi:LIPIcs.ITP.2022.29,
  author =	{Sakaguchi, Kazuhiko},
  title =	{{Reflexive Tactics for Algebra, Revisited}},
  booktitle =	{13th International Conference on Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP 2022)},
  pages =	{29:1--29:22},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-252-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{237},
  editor =	{Andronick, June and de Moura, Leonardo},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2022.29},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-167385},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.ITP.2022.29},
  annote =	{Keywords: Coq, Elpi, \lambdaProlog, Mathematical Components, algebraic structures, packed classes, canonical structures, proof by reflection}
}
Document
System Description
DOI: 10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.34
Hierarchy Builder: Algebraic hierarchies Made Easy in Coq with Elpi (System Description)

Authors: Cyril Cohen, Kazuhiko Sakaguchi, and Enrico Tassi

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 167, 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)

Abstract
It is nowadays customary to organize libraries of machine checked proofs around hierarchies of algebraic structures. One influential example is the Mathematical Components library on top of which the long and intricate proof of the Odd Order Theorem could be fully formalized. Still, building algebraic hierarchies in a proof assistant such as Coq requires a lot of manual labor and often a deep expertise in the internals of the prover. Moreover, according to our experience, making a hierarchy evolve without causing breakage in client code is equally tricky: even a simple refactoring such as splitting a structure into two simpler ones is hard to get right. In this paper we describe HB, a high level language to build hierarchies of algebraic structures and to make these hierarchies evolve without breaking user code. The key concepts are the ones of factory, builder and abbreviation that let the hierarchy developer describe an actual interface for their library. Behind that interface the developer can provide appropriate code to ensure backward compatibility. We implement the HB language in the hierarchy-builder addon for the Coq system using the Elpi extension language.
Cite as

Cyril Cohen, Kazuhiko Sakaguchi, and Enrico Tassi. Hierarchy Builder: Algebraic hierarchies Made Easy in Coq with Elpi (System Description). In 5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 167, pp. 34:1-34:21, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2020)

Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cohen_et_al:LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.34,
  author =	{Cohen, Cyril and Sakaguchi, Kazuhiko and Tassi, Enrico},
  title =	{{Hierarchy Builder: Algebraic hierarchies Made Easy in Coq with Elpi}},
  booktitle =	{5th International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction (FSCD 2020)},
  pages =	{34:1--34:21},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-155-9},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2020},
  volume =	{167},
  editor =	{Ariola, Zena M.},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.34},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-123562},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.FSCD.2020.34},
  annote =	{Keywords: Algebraic Hierarchy, Packed Classes, Coq, Elpi, Metaprogramming, \lambdaProlog}
}
  • Refine by Type
  • 5 Document/PDF
  • 2 Document/HTML

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 2 2025
  • 2 2022
  • 1 2020

  • Refine by Author
  • 2 Komendantskaya, Ekaterina
  • 2 Sakaguchi, Kazuhiko
  • 1 Arnaboldi, Luca
  • 1 Atkey, Robert
  • 1 Baanen, Anne
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Series/Journal
  • 5 LIPIcs

  • Refine by Classification
  • 4 Theory of computation → Type theory
  • 3 Theory of computation → Logic and verification
  • 2 Computing methodologies → Neural networks
  • 2 Software and its engineering → Formal software verification
  • 2 Software and its engineering → Functional languages
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 2 Coq
  • 2 Elpi
  • 2 Neural Network Verification
  • 2 λProlog
  • 1 Algebraic Hierarchy
  • Show More...

Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2026 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact