6 Search Results for "L�wgren, Jonas"


Document
Making Self-Stabilizing Algorithms for Any Locally Greedy Problem

Authors: Johanne Cohen, Laurence Pilard, Mikaël Rabie, and Jonas Sénizergues

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 257, 2nd Symposium on Algorithmic Foundations of Dynamic Networks (SAND 2023)


Abstract
Self-stabilizing algorithms are a way to deal with network dynamicity, as it will update itself after a network change (addition or removal of nodes or edges), as long as changes are not frequent. We propose an automatic transformation of synchronous distributed algorithms that solve locally greedy and mendable problems into self-stabilizing algorithms in anonymous networks. Mendable problems are a generalization of greedy problems where any partial solution may be transformed -instead of completed- into a global solution: every time we extend the partial solution, we are allowed to change the previous partial solution up to a given distance. Locally here means that to extend a solution for a node, we need to look at a constant distance from it. In order to do this, we propose the first explicit self-stabilizing algorithm computing a (k,k-1)-ruling set (i.e. a "maximal independent set at distance k"). By combining this technique multiple times, we compute a distance-K coloring of the graph. With this coloring we can finally simulate Local model algorithms running in a constant number of rounds, using the colors as unique identifiers. Our algorithms work under the Gouda daemon, similar to the probabilistic daemon: if an event should eventually happen, it will occur.

Cite as

Johanne Cohen, Laurence Pilard, Mikaël Rabie, and Jonas Sénizergues. Making Self-Stabilizing Algorithms for Any Locally Greedy Problem. In 2nd Symposium on Algorithmic Foundations of Dynamic Networks (SAND 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 257, pp. 11:1-11:17, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cohen_et_al:LIPIcs.SAND.2023.11,
  author =	{Cohen, Johanne and Pilard, Laurence and Rabie, Mika\"{e}l and S\'{e}nizergues, Jonas},
  title =	{{Making Self-Stabilizing Algorithms for Any Locally Greedy Problem}},
  booktitle =	{2nd Symposium on Algorithmic Foundations of Dynamic Networks (SAND 2023)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:17},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-275-4},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2023},
  volume =	{257},
  editor =	{Doty, David and Spirakis, Paul},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SAND.2023.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-179475},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SAND.2023.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: Greedy Problem, Ruling Set, Distance-K Coloring, Self-Stabilizing Algorithm}
}
Document
Nearest-Neighbor Decompositions of Drawings

Authors: Jonas Cleve, Nicolas Grelier, Kristin Knorr, Maarten Löffler, Wolfgang Mulzer, and Daniel Perz

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 227, 18th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2022)


Abstract
Let 𝒟 be a set of straight-line segments in the plane, potentially crossing, and let c be a positive integer. We denote by P the union of the endpoints of the straight-line segments of 𝒟 and of the intersection points between pairs of segments. We say that 𝒟 has a nearest-neighbor decomposition into c parts if we can partition P into c point sets P₁, … , P_c such that 𝒟 is the union of the nearest neighbor graphs on P₁, … , P_c. We show that it is NP-complete to decide whether 𝒟 can be drawn as the union of c ≥ 3 nearest-neighbor graphs, even when no two segments cross. We show that for c = 2, it is NP-complete in the general setting and polynomial-time solvable when no two segments cross. We show the existence of an O(log n)-approximation algorithm running in subexponential time for partitioning 𝒟 into a minimum number of nearest-neighbor graphs. As a main tool in our analysis, we establish the notion of the conflict graph for a drawing 𝒟. The vertices of the conflict graph are the connected components of 𝒟, with the assumption that each connected component is the nearest neighbor graph of its vertices, and there is an edge between two components U and V if and only if the nearest neighbor graph of U ∪ V contains an edge between a vertex in U and a vertex in V. We show that string graphs are conflict graphs of certain planar drawings. For planar graphs and complete k-partite graphs, we give additional, more efficient constructions. We furthermore show that there are subdivisions of non-planar graphs that are not conflict graphs. Lastly, we show a separator lemma for conflict graphs.

Cite as

Jonas Cleve, Nicolas Grelier, Kristin Knorr, Maarten Löffler, Wolfgang Mulzer, and Daniel Perz. Nearest-Neighbor Decompositions of Drawings. In 18th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2022). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 227, pp. 21:1-21:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{cleve_et_al:LIPIcs.SWAT.2022.21,
  author =	{Cleve, Jonas and Grelier, Nicolas and Knorr, Kristin and L\"{o}ffler, Maarten and Mulzer, Wolfgang and Perz, Daniel},
  title =	{{Nearest-Neighbor Decompositions of Drawings}},
  booktitle =	{18th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT 2022)},
  pages =	{21:1--21:16},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-236-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2022},
  volume =	{227},
  editor =	{Czumaj, Artur and Xin, Qin},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2022.21},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-161812},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2022.21},
  annote =	{Keywords: nearest-neighbors, decompositions, drawing}
}
Document
Invited Talk
Repetitions in Strings: A "Constant" Problem (Invited Talk)

Authors: Hideo Bannai

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 191, 32nd Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2021)


Abstract
Repeating structures in strings is one of the most fundamental characteristics of strings, and has been an important topic in the field of combinatorics on words and combinatorial pattern matching since their beginnings. In this talk, I will focus on squares and maximal repetitions and review the "runs" theorem [Hideo Bannai et al., 2017] as well as related results (e.g. [Aviezri S. Fraenkel and Jamie Simpson, 1998; Yuta Fujishige et al., 2017; Ryo Sugahara et al., 2019; Philip Bille et al., 2020; Hideo Bannai et al., 2020; Jonas Ellert and Johannes Fischer, 2021]) which address the two main questions: how many of them can be contained in a string of given length, and algorithms for computing them.

Cite as

Hideo Bannai. Repetitions in Strings: A "Constant" Problem (Invited Talk). In 32nd Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2021). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 191, p. 1:1, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2021)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bannai:LIPIcs.CPM.2021.1,
  author =	{Bannai, Hideo},
  title =	{{Repetitions in Strings: A "Constant" Problem}},
  booktitle =	{32nd Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2021)},
  pages =	{1:1--1:1},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-186-3},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2021},
  volume =	{191},
  editor =	{Gawrychowski, Pawe{\l} and Starikovskaya, Tatiana},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2021.1},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-139523},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2021.1},
  annote =	{Keywords: Maximal repetitions, Squares, Lyndon words}
}
Document
A Computational Investigation on the Strength of Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulations

Authors: Michael Bastubbe, Marco E. Lübbecke, and Jonas T. Witt

Published in: LIPIcs, Volume 103, 17th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2018)


Abstract
In Dantzig-Wolfe reformulation of an integer program one convexifies a subset of the constraints, leading to potentially stronger dual bounds from the respective linear programming relaxation. As the subset can be chosen arbitrarily, this includes the trivial cases of convexifying no and all constraints, resulting in a weakest and strongest reformulation, respectively. Our computational study aims at better understanding of what happens in between these extremes. For a collection of integer programs with few constraints we compute, optimally solve, and evaluate the relaxations of all possible (exponentially many) Dantzig-Wolfe reformulations (with mild extensions to larger models from the MIPLIBs). We observe that only a tiny number of different dual bounds actually occur and that only a few inclusion-wise minimal representatives exist for each. This aligns with considerably different impacts of individual constraints on the strengthening the relaxation, some of which have almost no influence. In contrast, types of constraints that are convexified in textbook reformulations have a larger effect. We relate our experiments to what could be called a hierarchy of Dantzig-Wolfe reformulations.

Cite as

Michael Bastubbe, Marco E. Lübbecke, and Jonas T. Witt. A Computational Investigation on the Strength of Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulations. In 17th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 103, pp. 11:1-11:12, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{bastubbe_et_al:LIPIcs.SEA.2018.11,
  author =	{Bastubbe, Michael and L\"{u}bbecke, Marco E. and Witt, Jonas T.},
  title =	{{A Computational Investigation on the Strength of Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulations}},
  booktitle =	{17th International Symposium on Experimental Algorithms (SEA 2018)},
  pages =	{11:1--11:12},
  series =	{Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-95977-070-5},
  ISSN =	{1868-8969},
  year =	{2018},
  volume =	{103},
  editor =	{D'Angelo, Gianlorenzo},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2018.11},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-89464},
  doi =		{10.4230/LIPIcs.SEA.2018.11},
  annote =	{Keywords: Dantzig-Wolfe reformulation, strength of reformulations, Lagrangean relaxation, partial convexification, column generation, hierarchy of relaxations}
}
Document
A Data-Driven Approach for Classification of Subjectivity in Personal Narratives

Authors: Kenji Sagae, Andrew S. Gordon, Morteza Dehghani, Mike Metke, Jackie S. Kim, Sarah I. Gimbel, Christine Tipper, Jonas Kaplan, and Mary Helen Immordino-Yang

Published in: OASIcs, Volume 32, 2013 Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative


Abstract
Personal narratives typically involve a narrator who participates in a sequence of events in the past. The narrator is therefore present at two narrative levels: (1) the extradiegetic level, where the act of narration takes place, with the narrator addressing an audience directly; and (2) the diegetic level, where the events in the story take place, with the narrator as a participant (usually the protagonist). Although story understanding is commonly associated with semantics of the diegetic level (i.e., understanding the events that take place within the story), personal narratives may also contain important information at the extradiegetic level that frames the narrated events and is crucial for capturing the narrator’s intent. We present a data-driven modeling approach that learns to identify subjective passages that express mental and emotional states of the narrator, placing them at either the diegetic or extradiegetic level. We describe an experiment where we used narratives from personal weblog posts to measure the effectiveness of our approach across various topics in this narrative genre.

Cite as

Kenji Sagae, Andrew S. Gordon, Morteza Dehghani, Mike Metke, Jackie S. Kim, Sarah I. Gimbel, Christine Tipper, Jonas Kaplan, and Mary Helen Immordino-Yang. A Data-Driven Approach for Classification of Subjectivity in Personal Narratives. In 2013 Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative. Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs), Volume 32, pp. 198-213, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2013)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{sagae_et_al:OASIcs.CMN.2013.198,
  author =	{Sagae, Kenji and Gordon, Andrew S. and Dehghani, Morteza and Metke, Mike and Kim, Jackie S. and Gimbel, Sarah I. and Tipper, Christine and Kaplan, Jonas and Immordino-Yang, Mary Helen},
  title =	{{A Data-Driven Approach for Classification of Subjectivity in Personal Narratives}},
  booktitle =	{2013 Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative},
  pages =	{198--213},
  series =	{Open Access Series in Informatics (OASIcs)},
  ISBN =	{978-3-939897-57-6},
  ISSN =	{2190-6807},
  year =	{2013},
  volume =	{32},
  editor =	{Finlayson, Mark A. and Fisseni, Bernhard and L\"{o}we, Benedikt and Meister, Jan Christoph},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2013.198},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-41454},
  doi =		{10.4230/OASIcs.CMN.2013.198},
  annote =	{Keywords: personal narrative, subjectivity, diegetic levels, discourse}
}
Document
Five things I believe about the aesthetics of interaction design

Authors: Jonas Löwgren

Published in: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8292, The Study of Visual Aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction (2008)


Abstract
1. It makes little sense to talk about "visual aesthetics" as an isolated modality. 2. The genre determines the aesthetic qualities. 3. Aesthetic is not equal to good, pleasant, pretty, or nice. 4. Aesthetic experience is connected with intellectual deliberation as much as with immediate, "visceral" response. 5. We need holistic, interpretative approaches to dealing with aesthetics in interaction design. These five beliefs are introduced and substantiated by means of examples and argumentation.

Cite as

Jonas Löwgren. Five things I believe about the aesthetics of interaction design. In The Study of Visual Aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 8292, pp. 1-8, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2008)


Copy BibTex To Clipboard

@InProceedings{lowgren:DagSemProc.08292.4,
  author =	{L\"{o}wgren, Jonas},
  title =	{{Five things I believe about the aesthetics of interaction design}},
  booktitle =	{The Study of Visual Aesthetics in Human-Computer Interaction},
  pages =	{1--8},
  series =	{Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)},
  ISSN =	{1862-4405},
  year =	{2008},
  volume =	{8292},
  editor =	{Marc Hassenzahl and Gitte Lindgaard and Axel Platz and Noam Tractinsky},
  publisher =	{Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik},
  address =	{Dagstuhl, Germany},
  URL =		{https://drops-dev.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.08292.4},
  URN =		{urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-16234},
  doi =		{10.4230/DagSemProc.08292.4},
  annote =	{Keywords: Aesthetics, interaction design}
}
  • Refine by Author
  • 1 Bannai, Hideo
  • 1 Bastubbe, Michael
  • 1 Cleve, Jonas
  • 1 Cohen, Johanne
  • 1 Dehghani, Morteza
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Classification
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Combinatorics on words
  • 1 Mathematics of computing → Integer programming
  • 1 Theory of computation → Computational geometry
  • 1 Theory of computation → Distributed algorithms

  • Refine by Keyword
  • 1 Aesthetics
  • 1 Dantzig-Wolfe reformulation
  • 1 Distance-K Coloring
  • 1 Greedy Problem
  • 1 Lagrangean relaxation
  • Show More...

  • Refine by Type
  • 6 document

  • Refine by Publication Year
  • 1 2008
  • 1 2013
  • 1 2018
  • 1 2021
  • 1 2022
  • Show More...

Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail