On the Logic of Normative Systems

Authors Thomas Ågotnes, Wiebe van der Hoek, Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, Carles Sierra, Michael Wooldridge



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

DagSemProc.07122.24.pdf
  • Filesize: 220 kB
  • 13 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Thomas Ågotnes
Wiebe van der Hoek
Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar
Carles Sierra
Michael Wooldridge

Cite As Get BibTex

Thomas Ågotnes, Wiebe van der Hoek, Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, Carles Sierra, and Michael Wooldridge. On the Logic of Normative Systems. In Normative Multi-agent Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Volume 7122, pp. 1-13, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2007) https://doi.org/10.4230/DagSemProc.07122.24

Abstract

We introduce emph{Normative Temporal Logic} (acro{ntl}), a logic for
reasoning about normative systems. acro{ntl} is a generalisation of
the well-known branching-time temporal logic acro{ctl}, in which the
path quantifiers $Apath$ (``on all pathsldots'') and $Epath$ (``on
some pathldots'') are replaced by the indexed deontic operators
$O{
s}$ and $P{
s}$, where for example $O{
s}phi$ means
``$phi$ is obligatory in the context of normative system $
s$''.
After defining the logic, we give a sound and complete axiomatisation,
and discuss the logic's relationship to standard deontic logics.  We
present a symbolic representation language for models and normative
systems, and identify four different model checking problems,
corresponding to whether or not a model is represented symbolically or
explicitly, and whether or not we are given an interpretation for the
normative systems named in formulae to be checked. We show that the
complexity of model checking varies from acro{p}-complete up to
acro{exptime}-hard for these variations.

Subject Classification

Keywords
  • Normative systems
  • normative temporal logic
  • deontic logic

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail