Considering that, in many areas esp. outside cultural heritage, preserving the intent behind activities or projects, is at least as important as preserving the associated digital data, we argue that project policies are the natural means to describe an intent in a sustainable implementation-independent way, after the project actors have reached an agreement.
@InProceedings{jaquin_et_al:DagSemProc.10291.13, author = {Jaquin, Thierry and D\'{e}jean, Herv\'{e} and Chanod, Jean-Pierre}, title = {{Preserving the Intent behind}}, booktitle = {Automation in Digital Preservation}, pages = {1--3}, series = {Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (DagSemProc)}, ISSN = {1862-4405}, year = {2010}, volume = {10291}, editor = {Jean-Pierre Chanod and Milena Dobreva and Andreas Rauber and Seamus Ross}, publisher = {Schloss Dagstuhl -- Leibniz-Zentrum f{\"u}r Informatik}, address = {Dagstuhl, Germany}, URL = {https://drops.dagstuhl.de/entities/document/10.4230/DagSemProc.10291.13}, URN = {urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-27704}, doi = {10.4230/DagSemProc.10291.13}, annote = {Keywords: Digital preservation, policy, intent perservation, consensus} }
Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing