An Experimental Comparison of Two Definitions for Groups of Moving Entities (Short Paper)

Authors Lionov Wiratma, Maarten Löffler, Frank Staals



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.GISCIENCE.2018.64.pdf
  • Filesize: 472 kB
  • 6 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Lionov Wiratma
  • Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, mailto:l.wiratma@uu.nl, Department of Informatics, Parahyangan Catholic University, Bandung, Indonesia
Maarten Löffler
  • Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Frank Staals
  • Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Cite AsGet BibTex

Lionov Wiratma, Maarten Löffler, and Frank Staals. An Experimental Comparison of Two Definitions for Groups of Moving Entities (Short Paper). In 10th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2018). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 114, pp. 64:1-64:6, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2018)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.GISCIENCE.2018.64

Abstract

Two of the grouping definitions for trajectories that have been developed in recent years allow a continuous motion model and allow varying shape groups. One of these definitions was suggested as a refinement of the other. In this paper we perform an experimental comparison to highlight the differences in these two definitions on various data sets.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Computing methodologies → Model development and analysis
  • Theory of computation → Computational geometry
Keywords
  • Trajectories
  • grouping algorithms
  • experimental comparison

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Marc Benkert, Joachim Gudmundsson, Florian Hübner, and Thomas Wolle. Reporting flock patterns. Comput. Geom., 41(3):111-125, 2008. Google Scholar
  2. Kevin Buchin, Maike Buchin, Marc van Kreveld, Bettina Speckmann, and Frank Staals. Trajectory grouping structure. Journal of Computational Geometry, 6(1):75-98, 2015. Google Scholar
  3. Joachim Gudmundsson, Patrick Laube, and Thomas Wolle. Computational movement analysis. In Wolfgang Kresse and David N. Danko, editors, Handbook of Geographic Information, pages 725-741. Springer, Berlin, 2012. Google Scholar
  4. Stefan Holl. Methoden für die Bemessung der Leistungsfähigkeit multidirektional genutzter Fußverkehrsanlagen. Dr., Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Jülich, 2016. Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Diss., 2016. Google Scholar
  5. Yan Huang, Cai Chen, and Pinliang Dong. Modeling Herds and Their Evolvements from Trajectory Data, pages 90-105. Springer, Berlin, 2008. Google Scholar
  6. San-Yih Hwang, Ying-Han Liu, Jeng-Kuen Chiu, and Ee-Peng Lim. Mining mobile group patterns: A trajectory-based approach. In Proc. 9th Pacific-Asia Conference on Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, PAKDD'05, pages 713-718. Springer, 2005. Google Scholar
  7. Hoyoung Jeung, Man Lung Yiu, Xiaofang Zhou, Christian S. Jensen, and Heng Tao Shen. Discovery of convoys in trajectory databases. PVLDB, 1(1):1068-1080, 2008. Google Scholar
  8. Panos Kalnis, Nikos Mamoulis, and Spiridon Bakiras. On Discovering Moving Clusters in Spatio-temporal Data, pages 364-381. Springer, Berlin, 2005. Google Scholar
  9. Zhenhui Li, Bolin Ding, Jiawei Han, and Roland Kays. Swarm: Mining relaxed temporal moving object clusters. PVLDB, 3(1):723-734, 2010. Google Scholar
  10. Marc van Kreveld, Maarten Löffler, Frank Staals, and Lionov Wiratma. A Refined Definition for Groups of Moving Entities and its Computation. In Proc. 27th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation, volume 64, pages 48:1-48:12. LIPIcs, 2016. Google Scholar
  11. Yu Zheng and Xiaofang Zhou. Computing with Spatial Trajectories. Springer, 2011. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail