Document Open Access Logo

Towards Language-Parametric Semantic Editor Services Based on Declarative Type System Specifications (Brave New Idea Paper)

Authors Daniel A. A. Pelsmaeker , Hendrik van Antwerpen , Eelco Visser

PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.26.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.52 MB
  • 18 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Daniel A. A. Pelsmaeker
  • Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Hendrik van Antwerpen
  • Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
Eelco Visser
  • Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

Funding

This research was partially funded by the NWO VICI Language Designer’s Workbench project (639.023.206).

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their feedback on previous versions of this paper. We also thank Arjen Rouvoet for his comments and his work on Ministatix, an implementation of the core Statix language we use for prototyping.

Cite AsGet BibTex

Daniel A. A. Pelsmaeker, Hendrik van Antwerpen, and Eelco Visser. Towards Language-Parametric Semantic Editor Services Based on Declarative Type System Specifications (Brave New Idea Paper). In 33rd European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming (ECOOP 2019). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 134, pp. 26:1-26:18, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2019)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ECOOP.2019.26

Abstract

Editor services assist programmers to more effectively write and comprehend code. Implementing editor services correctly is not trivial. This paper focuses on the specification of semantic editor services, those that use the semantic model of a program. The specification of refactorings is a common subject of study, but many other semantic editor services have received little attention. We propose a language-parametric approach to the definition of semantic editor services, using a declarative specification of the static semantics of the programming language, and constraint solving. Editor services are specified as constraint problems, and language specifications are used to ensure correctness. We describe our approach for the following semantic editor services: reference resolution, find usages, goto subclasses, code completion, and the extract definition refactoring. We do this in the context of Statix, a constraint language for the specification of type systems. We investigate the specification of editor services in terms of Statix constraints, and the requirements these impose on a suitable solver.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Software and its engineering → Semantics
Keywords
  • semantics
  • constraint solving
  • Statix
  • name binding
  • editor services
  • reference resolution
  • code completion
  • refactoring

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
    0
    Metadata Views

References

  1. Catarina Coquand, Makoto Takeyama, and Dan Synek. An Emacs-Interface for Type-Directed Supportfor Constructing Proofs and Programs. In European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ENTCS, volume 2, 2006. Google Scholar
  2. Luis Eduardo de Souza Amorim, Sebastian Erdweg, Guido Wachsmuth, and Eelco Visser. Principled syntactic code completion using placeholders. In Tijs van der Storm, Emilie Balland, and Dániel Varró, editors, Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 31 - November 1, 2016, pages 163-175. ACM, 2016. Google Scholar
  3. Sebastian Erdweg, Tijs van der Storm, Markus Völter, Meinte Boersma, Remi Bosman, William R. Cook, Albert Gerritsen, Angelo Hulshout, Steven Kelly, Alex Loh, Gabriël Konat, Pedro J. Molina, Martin Palatnik, Risto Pohjonen, Eugen Schindler, Klemens Schindler, Riccardo Solmi, Vlad A. Vergu, Eelco Visser, Kevin van der Vlist, Guido Wachsmuth, and Jimi van der Woning. The State of the Art in Language Workbenches - Conclusions from the Language Workbench Challenge. In Martin Erwig, Richard F. Paige, and Eric Van Wyk, editors, Software Language Engineering - 6th International Conference, SLE 2013, Indianapolis, IN, USA, October 26-28, 2013. Proceedings, volume 8225 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 197-217. Springer, 2013. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02654-1_11.
  4. M. Eysholdt and H. Behrens. Xtext: implement your language faster than the quick and dirty way. In Proceedings of the ACM international conference companion on Object oriented programming systems languages and applications companion, pages 307-309. ACM, 2010. Google Scholar
  5. Martin Fowler. Language Workbenches: The Killer-App for Domain Specific Languages?, 2005. Google Scholar
  6. Lennart C. L. Kats and Eelco Visser. The Spoofax language workbench: rules for declarative specification of languages and IDEs. In William R. Cook, Siobhán Clarke, and Martin C. Rinard, editors, Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, OOPSLA 2010, pages 444-463, Reno/Tahoe, Nevada, 2010. ACM. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1869459.1869497.
  7. Gabriël Konat, Lennart C. L. Kats, Guido Wachsmuth, and Eelco Visser. Declarative Name Binding and Scope Rules. In Krzysztof Czarnecki and Görel Hedin, editors, Software Language Engineering, 5th International Conference, SLE 2012, Dresden, Germany, September 26-28, 2012, Revised Selected Papers, volume 7745 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 311-331. Springer, 2012. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36089-3_18.
  8. Tom Mens, Serge Demeyer, Bart Du Bois, Hans Stenten, and Pieter Van Gorp. Refactoring: Current Research and Future Trends. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 82(3):483-499, 2003. Google Scholar
  9. Gail C. Murphy, Mik Kersten, and Leah Findlater. How Are Java Software Developers Using the Eclipse IDE? IEEE Software, 23(4):76-83, 2006. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MS.2006.105.
  10. Pierre Néron, Andrew P. Tolmach, Eelco Visser, and Guido Wachsmuth. A Theory of Name Resolution. In Jan Vitek, editor, Programming Languages and Systems - 24th European Symposium on Programming, ESOP 2015, Held as Part of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2015, London, UK, April 11-18, 2015. Proceedings, volume 9032 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 205-231. Springer, 2015. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46669-8_9.
  11. Cyrus Omar, Ian Voysey, Michael Hilton, Jonathan Aldrich, and Matthew A. Hammer. Hazelnut: a bidirectionally typed structure editor calculus. In Giuseppe Castagna and Andrew D. Gordon, editors, Proceedings of the 44th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, POPL 2017, Paris, France, January 18-20, 2017, pages 86-99. ACM, 2017. Google Scholar
  12. Cyrus Omar, Ian Voysey, Michael Hilton, Joshua Sunshine, Claire Le Goues, Jonathan Aldrich, and Matthew A. Hammer. Toward Semantic Foundations for Program Editors. In Benjamin S. Lerner, Rastislav Bodík, and Shriram Krishnamurthi, editors, 2nd Summit on Advances in Programming Languages, SNAPL 2017, May 7-10, 2017, Asilomar, CA, USA, volume 71 of LIPIcs. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 2017. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.SNAPL.2017.11.
  13. Martin P. Robillard, Wesley Coelho, and Gail C. Murphy. How Effective Developers Investigate Source Code: An Exploratory Study. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 30(12):889-903, 2004. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2004.101.
  14. Max Schäfer and Oege de Moor. Specifying and implementing refactorings. In William R. Cook, Siobhán Clarke, and Martin C. Rinard, editors, Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, OOPSLA 2010, pages 286-301, Reno/Tahoe, Nevada, 2010. ACM. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1869459.1869485.
  15. Max Schäfer, Andreas Thies, Friedrich Steimann, and Frank Tip. A Comprehensive Approach to Naming and Accessibility in Refactoring Java Programs. IEEE Trans. Software Eng., 38(6):1233-1257, 2012. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2012.13.
  16. Friedrich Steimann. Constraint-Based Refactoring. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 40(1), 2018. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3156016.
  17. Friedrich Steimann, Marcus Frenkel, and Markus Voelter. Robust projectional editing. In Benoît Combemale, Marjan Mernik, and Bernhard Rumpe, editors, Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering, SLE 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 23-24, 2017, pages 79-90. ACM, 2017. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3136014.3136034.
  18. Emma Söderberg and Görel Hedin. Building semantic editors using JastAdd: tool demonstration. In Claus Brabrand and Eric Van Wyk, editors, Language Descriptions, Tools and Applications, LDTA 2011, Saarbrücken, Germany, March 26-27, 2011. Proceeding, page 11. ACM, 2011. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1988783.1988794.
  19. Frank Tip, Robert M. Fuhrer, Adam Kiezun, Michael D. Ernst, Ittai Balaban, and Bjorn De Sutter. Refactoring using type constraints. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 33(3):9, 2011. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1961204.1961205.
  20. Hendrik van Antwerpen, Pierre Néron, Andrew P. Tolmach, Eelco Visser, and Guido Wachsmuth. A constraint language for static semantic analysis based on scope graphs. In Martin Erwig and Tiark Rompf, editors, Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGPLAN Workshop on Partial Evaluation and Program Manipulation, PEPM 2016, St. Petersburg, FL, USA, January 20 - 22, 2016, pages 49-60. ACM, 2016. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2847538.2847543.
  21. Hendrik van Antwerpen, Casper Bach Poulsen, Arjen Rouvoet, and Eelco Visser. Scopes as types. Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, 2(OOPSLA), 2018. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3276484.
  22. Eelco Visser, Guido Wachsmuth, Andrew P. Tolmach, Pierre Néron, Vlad A. Vergu, Augusto Passalaqua, and Gabriël Konat. A Language Designer’s Workbench: A One-Stop-Shop for Implementation and Verification of Language Designs. In Andrew P. Black, Shriram Krishnamurthi, Bernd Bruegge, and Joseph N. Ruskiewicz, editors, Onward! 2014, Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming & Software, part of SPLASH '14, Portland, OR, USA, October 20-24, 2014, pages 95-111. ACM, 2014. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2661136.2661149.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2024 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH Imprint Privacy Contact