Development and Operationalisation of Local Sustainability Indicators - A Global South Perspective on Data Challenges and Opportunities for GIScience (Short Paper)

Authors Stefan Steiniger , Carolina Rojas , Ricardo Truffello , Jonathan Barton



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.GIScience.2023.69.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.55 MB
  • 6 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Stefan Steiniger
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile
  • CEDEUS, Santiago, Chile
Carolina Rojas
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
  • CEDEUS, Santiago, Chile
Ricardo Truffello
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
  • CEDEUS, Santiago, Chile
Jonathan Barton
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
  • CEDEUS, Santiago, Chile

Cite AsGet BibTex

Stefan Steiniger, Carolina Rojas, Ricardo Truffello, and Jonathan Barton. Development and Operationalisation of Local Sustainability Indicators - A Global South Perspective on Data Challenges and Opportunities for GIScience (Short Paper). In 12th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2023). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 277, pp. 69:1-69:6, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2023)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.GIScience.2023.69

Abstract

Evaluating and monitoring the sustainable development of nations and cities requires sets of indicators. Such indicator sets should measure equity, health, environmental, or governmental progress or recess - among other sustainability aspects. In 2015 the United Nations ratified 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) assessed through 231 indicators. However, other - local - sets of indicators have been developed too. In this paper we review geodata challenges that emerged when we developed four sustainability indicator sets in Chile. Faced challenges include (geo)data availability and data representativeness, among others. We analyse how GIScience knowledge has contributed to indicator development and outline three priority research topics: (i) updating indicators based on automated processes, while respecting representativeness, (ii) tools for planning scenario generation, and (iii) methods for short- and long-term forecasting.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Information systems → Geographic information systems
Keywords
  • geographic information
  • SDGs
  • indicators
  • sustainable development
  • Chile

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. S. Amoushahi, A. Salmanmahiny, H. Moradi, A. R. M. Tabrizi, and C. Galán. Localizing sustainable urban development (sud): Application of an fdm-ahp approach for prioritizing urban sustainability indicators in iran provinces. Sustainable Cities and Society, 77:103592, 2022. Google Scholar
  2. R. Crespo and A. Rajabifard. Inverse model using land and property sub-systems for planning future cities: A general framework. Journal of Urban & Regional Analysis, 14(1), 2022. Google Scholar
  3. A. S. Fotheringham, R. Crespo, and J. Yao. Exploring, modelling and predicting spatiotemporal variations in house prices. The Annals of Regional Science, 54:417-436, 2015. Google Scholar
  4. M. S. Fox and C. J. Pettit. On the completeness of open city data for measuring city indicators. In 2015 IEEE First International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), pages 1-6. IEEE, 2015. Google Scholar
  5. D. Hoornweg, F. Ruiz Nuñez, M. Freire, N. Palugyai, M. Villaveces, and E. W. Herrera. City indicators: Now to nanjing, 2007. Google Scholar
  6. R. Kitchin, S. Maalsen, and G. McArdle. The praxis and politics of building urban dashboards. Geoforum, 77:93-101, 2016. Google Scholar
  7. E. Pajares, B. Büttner, U. Jehle, A. Nichols, and G. Wulfhorst. Accessibility by proximity: Addressing the lack of interactive accessibility instruments for active mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, 93:103080, 2021. Google Scholar
  8. G. Percivall. Progress in OGC web services interoperability development. In L. Di and H.K. Ramapriyan, editors, Standard-Based Data and Information Systems for Earth Observation, pages 37-61. Springer, Berlin, 2010. Google Scholar
  9. C. J. Pettit, R. E. Klosterman, M. Nino-Ruiz, I. Widjaja, P. Russo, M. Tomko, R. Sinnott, and R. Stimson. The Online What if? Planning Support System. In S. Geertman, F. Toppen, and J. Stillwell, editors, Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development, LNGC, pages 349-362. Springer Berlin, 2013. Google Scholar
  10. M. Prakash, K. Teksoz, J. Espey, J. Sachs, M. Shank, and G. Schmidt-Traub. The U.S. Cities Sustainable Development Goals Index 2017 - Achiving a sustainable urban America. Technical report, Sustainable Development Solutions Network, New York, NY, USA, 2017. Google Scholar
  11. S. Steiniger, M. E. Poorazizi, and A. J. S. Hunter. Planning with citizens: Implementation of an e-planning platform and analysis of research needs. Urban Planning, 1(2):46-64, 2016. Google Scholar
  12. S. Steiniger, E. Wagemann, F. de la Barrera, M. Molinos-Senante, R. Villegas, H. de la Fuente, A. Vives, G. Arce, J.C. Herrera, J.A. Carrasco, et al. Localising urban sustainability indicators: The cedeus indicator set, and lessons from an expert-driven process. Cities, 101:102683, 2020. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail