DagRep.13.10.50.pdf
- Filesize: 2.26 MB
- 15 pages
Document
Formal Methods for Correct Persistent Programming (Dagstuhl Seminar 23412)
Authors and all authors of the abstracts in this report
-
Part of:
Issue:
Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 13, Issue 10
Volume: Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 13
Journal: Dagstuhl Reports (DagRep) - License:
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license
- Publication Date: 2024-04-08
Cite AsGet BibTex
Ori Lahav, Azalea Raad, Joseph Tassarotti, Viktor Vafeiadis, and Anton Podkopaev. Formal Methods for Correct Persistent Programming (Dagstuhl Seminar 23412). In Dagstuhl Reports, Volume 13, Issue 10, pp. 50-64, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)
https://doi.org/10.4230/DagRep.13.10.50
https://doi.org/10.4230/DagRep.13.10.50
Abstract
Recently developed non-volatile memory (NVM) devices provide persistency guarantees along with byte-addressable accesses and performance characteristics that are much closer to volatile random-access memory (RAM). However, writing programs that correctly use these devices is challenging, and bugs related to their use can cause permanent data loss in applications.
This Dagstuhl Seminar brought together experts in a range of areas related to concurrency and persistent memory to explore and develop formal methods for ensuring the correctness of applications that use persistent memory. Talks and discussions at the seminar highlighted challenges related to correctness criteria for concurrent objects using persistent memory, liveness properties of persistent objects, and how changes in NVM and related technologies should shape the development of formal methods for NVM.
Subject Classification
ACM Subject Classification
- Hardware → Non-volatile memory
- Theory of computation → Program semantics
- Theory of computation → Program verification
Keywords
- concurrency
- formal methods
- non-volatile-memory
- persistency
- verification
Metrics
- Access Statistics
-
Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
0PDF Downloads