Exponential Steepest Ascent from Valued Constraint Graphs of Pathwidth Four

Authors Artem Kaznatcheev , Melle van Marle



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.CP.2024.17.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.69 MB
  • 16 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Artem Kaznatcheev
  • Department of Mathematics, and Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
Melle van Marle
  • Department of Mathematics, and Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Acknowledgements

AK would like to thank Dave Cohen and Peter Jeavons for helpful discussions. AK and MvM would also like to thank Daniel Dadush for helpful feedback and questions.

Cite AsGet BibTex

Artem Kaznatcheev and Melle van Marle. Exponential Steepest Ascent from Valued Constraint Graphs of Pathwidth Four. In 30th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 307, pp. 17:1-17:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024)
https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2024.17

Abstract

We examine the complexity of maximising fitness via local search on valued constraint satisfaction problems (VCSPs). We consider two kinds of local ascents: (1) steepest ascents, where each step changes the domain that produces a maximal increase in fitness; and (2) ≺-ordered ascents, where - of the domains with available fitness increasing changes - each step changes the ≺-minimal domain. We provide a general padding argument to simulate any ordered ascent by a steepest ascent. We construct a VCSP that is a path of binary constraints between alternating 2-state and 3-state domains with exponentially long ordered ascents. We apply our padding argument to this VCSP to obtain a Boolean VCSP that has a constraint (hyper)graph of arity 5 and pathwidth 4 with exponential steepest ascents. This is an improvement on the previous best known construction for long steepest ascents, which had arity 8 and pathwidth 7.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Constraint and logic programming
Keywords
  • valued constraint satisfaction problem
  • steepest ascent
  • local search
  • bounded treewidth
  • intractability

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Umberto Bertelè and Francesco Brioschi. On non-serial dynamic programming. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 14(2):137-148, 1973. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0097-3165(73)90016-2.
  2. Clément Carbonnel, Miguel Romero, and Stanislav Živný. The complexity of general-valued constraint satisfaction problems seen from the other side. SIAM Journal on Computing, 51(1):19-69, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/19M1250121.
  3. David A Cohen, Martin C Cooper, Artem Kaznatcheev, and Mark Wallace. Steepest ascent can be exponential in bounded treewidth problems. Operations Research Letters, 48:217-224, 2020. Google Scholar
  4. K. Crona, D. Greene, and M. Barlow. The peaks and geometry of fitness landscapes. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 317:1-10, 2013. Google Scholar
  5. Reinhard Diestel. Graph Theory. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 5th edition, 2017. Google Scholar
  6. John H Gillespie. A simple stochastic gene substitution model. Theoretical population biology, 23(2):202-215, 1983. Google Scholar
  7. Georg Gottlob, Gianluigi Greco, and Francesco Scarcello. Tractable optimization problems through hypergraph-based structural restrictions. In International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, pages 16-30. Springer, 2009. Google Scholar
  8. P. Jeavons, A. Krokhin, and S. Živný. The complexity of valued constraint satisfaction. Bulletin of the European Association for Theoretical Computer Science, 113:21-55, 2014. Google Scholar
  9. David S. Johnson, Christos H. Papadimitriou, and Mihalis Yannakakis. How easy is local search? Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 37(1):79-100, 1988. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0000(88)90046-3.
  10. Artem Kaznatcheev. Computational complexity as an ultimate constraint on evolution. Genetics, 212(1):245-265, 2019. Google Scholar
  11. Artem Kaznatcheev. Algorithmic Biology of Evolution and Ecology. PhD thesis, University of Oxford, 2020. Google Scholar
  12. Artem Kaznatcheev. Local search for valued constraint satisfaction parameterized by treedepth. ArXiv, 2024. Google Scholar
  13. Artem Kaznatcheev, David A Cohen, and Peter Jeavons. Representing fitness landscapes by valued constraints to understand the complexity of local search. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 69:1077-1102, 2020. Google Scholar
  14. Mark W. Krentel. On finding and verifying locally optimal solutions. SIAM Journal on Computing, 19(4):742-749, 1990. URL: https://doi.org/10.1137/0219052.
  15. Daniel A Levinthal. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science, 43(7):934-950, 1997. Google Scholar
  16. H. Allen Orr. The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nature Reviews. Genetics, 6:119-127, 2005. Google Scholar
  17. Jan W Rivkin and Nicolaj Siggelkow. Patterned interactions in complex systems: Implications for exploration. Management Science, 53(7):1068-1085, 2007. Google Scholar
  18. T Roughgarden. Computing equilibria: A computational complexity perspective. Economic Theory, 42:193-236, 2010. Google Scholar
  19. Alexandru Strimbu. Simulating evolution on fitness landscapes represented by valued constraint satisfaction problems. arXiv:1912.02134, 2019. Google Scholar
  20. S. Wright. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection in evolution. In Proc. of the 6th International Congress on Genetics, pages 355-366, 1932. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail