Ex-Ante Constraint Elicitation in Incomplete DCOPs

Authors Roie Zivan , Shiraz Regev, William Yeoh



PDF
Thumbnail PDF

File

LIPIcs.CP.2024.33.pdf
  • Filesize: 1.2 MB
  • 16 pages

Document Identifiers

Author Details

Roie Zivan
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
Shiraz Regev
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
William Yeoh
  • Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA

Cite As Get BibTex

Roie Zivan, Shiraz Regev, and William Yeoh. Ex-Ante Constraint Elicitation in Incomplete DCOPs. In 30th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2024). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 307, pp. 33:1-33:16, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2024) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2024.33

Abstract

Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems (DCOPs) is a framework for representing and solving distributed combinatorial problems, where agents exchange messages to assign variables they own, such that the sum of constraint costs is minimized. When agents represent people (e.g., in meeting scheduling problems), the constraint information that the agents hold may be incomplete. For such scenarios, researchers proposed Incomplete DCOPs (I-DCOPs), which allow agents to elicit from their human users some of the missing information. Existing I-DCOP approaches evaluate solutions not only by their quality, but also the elicitation costs spent to find them (ex-post). Unfortunately, this may result in the agents spending a lot of effort (in terms of elicitation costs) to find high-quality solutions, and then ignoring them because previous lower-quality solutions were found with less effort. 
Therefore, we propose a different approach for solving I-DCOPs by evaluating solutions based on their quality and considering the elicitation cost beforehand (ex-ante). Agents are limited in the amount of information that they can elicit and, therefore, need to make smart decisions on choosing which missing information to elicit. We propose several heuristics for making these decisions. Our results indicate that some of the heuristics designed produce high-quality solutions, which significantly outperform the previously proposed ex-post heuristics.

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Distributed algorithms
Keywords
  • Distributed Constraint Optimization Problems
  • Preference Elicitation
  • Multi-Agent Optimization

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads

References

  1. Ferdinando Fioretto, Enrico Pontelli, and William Yeoh. Distributed constraint optimization problems and applications: A survey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 61:623-698, 2018. Google Scholar
  2. Katsutoshi Hirayama and Makoto Yokoo. Distributed partial constraint satisfaction problem. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP), pages 222-236, 1997. Google Scholar
  3. Tiep Le, Atena M. Tabakhi, Long Tran-Thanh, William Yeoh, and Tran Cao Son. Preference elicitation with interdependency and user bother cost. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pages 1459-1467, 2018. Google Scholar
  4. Rajiv Maheswaran, Jonathan Pearce, and Milind Tambe. Distributed algorithms for DCOP: A graphical game-based approach. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing Systems (PDCS), pages 432-439, 2004. Google Scholar
  5. Pragnesh J. Modi, Wei-Min Shen, Milind Tambe, and Makoto Yokoo. ADOPT: Asynchronous distributed constraint optimization with quality guarantees. Artificial Intelligence, 161(1-2):149-180, 2005. Google Scholar
  6. Arnon Netzer, Alon Grubshtein, and Amnon Meisels. Concurrent forward bounding for distributed constraint optimization problems. Artificial Intelligence, 193:186-216, 2012. Google Scholar
  7. Adrian Petcu and Boi Faltings. A scalable method for multiagent constraint optimization. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 1413-1420, 2005. Google Scholar
  8. Ben Rachmut, Roie Zivan, and William Yeoh. Communication-aware local search for distributed constraint optimization. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 75:637-675, 2022. Google Scholar
  9. Siddharth Sharma, Simone Sharma, and Anidhya Athaiya. Activation functions in neural networks. International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 4(12):310-316, 2020. Google Scholar
  10. Atena M. Tabakhi, Tiep Le, Ferdinando Fioretto, and William Yeoh. Preference elicitation for DCOPs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP), pages 278-296, 2017. Google Scholar
  11. Atena M. Tabakhi, Yuanming Xiao, William Yeoh, and Roie Zivan. Branch-and-bound heuristics for incomplete DCOPs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pages 1677-1679, 2021. Google Scholar
  12. Atena M. Tabakhi, William Yeoh, and Roie Zivan. Incomplete distributed constraint optimization problems: Model, algorithms, and heuristics. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Distributed Artificial Intelligence (DAI), pages 64-78, 2021. Google Scholar
  13. William Yeoh, Ariel Felner, and Sven Koenig. BnB-ADOPT: An asynchronous branch-and-bound DCOP algorithm. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 38:85-133, 2010. Google Scholar
  14. William Yeoh, Pradeep Varakantham, Xiaoxun Sun, and Sven Koenig. Incremental DCOP search algorithms for solving dynamic DCOP problems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), pages 257-264, 2015. Google Scholar
  15. Weixiong Zhang, Guandong Wang, Zhao Xing, and Lars Wittenburg. Distributed stochastic search and distributed breakout: Properties, comparison and applications to constraint optimization problems in sensor networks. Artificial Intelligence, 161(1-2):55-87, 2005. Google Scholar
  16. Roie Zivan and Amnon Meisels. Message delay and DisCSP search algorithms. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 46:415-439, October 2006. Google Scholar
  17. Roie Zivan, Steven Okamoto, and Hilla Peled. Explorative anytime local search for distributed constraint optimization. Artificial Intelligence, 212:1-26, 2014. Google Scholar
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail