Document Open Access Logo

Improved Algorithms for Quantum MaxCut via Partially Entangled Matchings

Authors Anuj Apte , Eunou Lee, Kunal Marwaha , Ojas Parekh , James Sud

PDF

File

Thumbnail PDF
PDF
LIPIcs.ESA.2025.101.pdf
  • Filesize: 0.7 MB
  • 14 pages

Document Identifiers

Related Versions

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Theory of computation → Approximation algorithms analysis
Keywords
  • Quantum computing
  • Quantum MaxCut
  • Maximum matching

Metrics

  • Access Statistics
  • Total Accesses (updated on a weekly basis)
    0
    PDF Downloads
    0
    Metadata Views

Abstract

We introduce a 0.611-approximation algorithm for Quantum MaxCut and a (1+√5)/4 ≈ 0.809-approximation algorithm for the EPR Hamiltonian of [King, 2023]. A novel ingredient in both of these algorithms is to partially entangle pairs of qubits associated to edges in a matching, while preserving the direction of their single-qubit Bloch vectors. This allows us to interpolate between product states and matching-based states with a tunable parameter.

Cite As Get BibTex

Anuj Apte, Eunou Lee, Kunal Marwaha, Ojas Parekh, and James Sud. Improved Algorithms for Quantum MaxCut via Partially Entangled Matchings. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 101:1-101:14, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.101

Author Details

Anuj Apte
  • University of Chicago, IL, USA
Eunou Lee
  • Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul, South Korea
Kunal Marwaha
  • University of Chicago, IL, USA
Ojas Parekh
  • Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA
James Sud
  • University of Chicago, IL, USA

Funding

K.M and J.S. acknowledge that this material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 2140001.
  • Lee, Eunou: E.L is supported by a KIAS Individual Grant CG093801 at Korea Institute for Advanced Study.
  • Marwaha, Kunal: K.M acknowledges support from AFOSR (FA9550-21-1-0008).
  • Parekh, Ojas: O.P. acknowledges that this material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Accelerated Research in Quantum Computing, Fundamental Algorithmic Research toward Quantum Utility (FAR-Qu).
  • Sud, James: J.S acknowledges that this work is funded in part by the STAQ project under award NSF Phy-232580; in part by the US Department of Energy Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, Accelerated Research for Quantum Computing Program.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by a collaboration between the US DOE and other Agencies. The work of A.A is supported by the Data Science Institute at the University of Chicago. This article has been authored by an employee of National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC under Contract No. DE-NA0003525 with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The employee owns all right, title and interest in and to the article and is solely responsible for its contents. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this article or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan https://www.energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan.

References

  1. Anurag Anshu, David Gosset, and Karen Morenz. Beyond product state approximations for a quantum analogue of Max Cut. LIPIcs, Volume 158, TQC 2020, 158:7:1-7:15, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.TQC.2020.7.
  2. Anuj Apte, Eunou Lee, Kunal Marwaha, Ojas Parekh, and James Sud. Improved algorithms for quantum maxcut via partially entangled matchings, 2025. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15276.
  3. Fernando G. S. L. Brandão and Aram W. Harrow. Product-state Approximations to Quantum Ground States, December 2014. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.0017.
  4. Jop Briet, Fernando Mario de Oliveira Filho, and Frank Vallentin. The positive semidefinite Grothendieck problem with rank constraint, 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14165-2_4.
  5. Toby Cubitt and Ashley Montanaro. Complexity classification of local Hamiltonian problems, March 2016. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1311.3161.
  6. Jack Edmonds. Paths, Trees, and Flowers. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 17:449-467, January 1965. URL: https://doi.org/10.4153/CJM-1965-045-4.
  7. Sevag Gharibian and Ojas Parekh. Almost optimal classical approximation algorithms for a quantum generalization of Max-Cut. LIPIcs, Volume 145, APPROX/RANDOM 2019, 145:31:1-31:17, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX-RANDOM.2019.31.
  8. Sander Gribling, Lennart Sinjorgo, and Renata Sotirov. Improved approximation ratios for the Quantum Max-Cut problem on general, triangle-free and bipartite graphs, April 2025. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11120.
  9. Felix Huber, Kevin Thompson, Ojas Parekh, and Sevag Gharibian. Second order cone relaxations for quantum Max Cut, November 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04120.
  10. Zackary Jorquera, Alexandra Kolla, Steven Kordonowy, Juspreet Singh Sandhu, and Stuart Wayland. Monogamy of Entanglement Bounds and Improved Approximation Algorithms for Qudit Hamiltonians, November 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.15544.
  11. Nathan Ju and Ansh Nagda. Improved approximation algorithms for the EPR Hamiltonian, April 2025. URL: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.10712.
  12. Robbie King. An Improved Approximation Algorithm for Quantum Max-Cut. Quantum, 7:1180, November 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-11-09-1180.
  13. Eunou Lee. Optimizing quantum circuit parameters via SDP, September 2022. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.00789.
  14. Eunou Lee and Ojas Parekh. An improved Quantum Max Cut approximation via matching, February 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.03616.
  15. Miguel Navascues, Stefano Pironio, and Antonio Acin. A convergent hierarchy of semidefinite programs characterizing the set of quantum correlations. New Journal of Physics, 10(7):073013, July 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/10/7/073013.
  16. Ojas Parekh and Kevin Thompson. Application of the Level-2 Quantum Lasserre Hierarchy in Quantum Approximation Algorithms. LIPIcs, Volume 198, ICALP 2021, 198:102:1-102:20, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2021.102.
  17. Ojas Parekh and Kevin Thompson. An Optimal Product-State Approximation for 2-Local Quantum Hamiltonians with Positive Terms, June 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.08342.
  18. Stephen Piddock and Ashley Montanaro. The complexity of antiferromagnetic interactions and 2D lattices, December 2015. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.04014.
  19. Jun Takahashi, Chaithanya Rayudu, Cunlu Zhou, Robbie King, Kevin Thompson, and Ojas Parekh. An SU(2)-symmetric Semidefinite Programming Hierarchy for Quantum Max Cut, August 2023. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15688.
  20. Adam Bene Watts, Anirban Chowdhury, Aidan Epperly, J. William Helton, and Igor Klep. Relaxations and Exact Solutions to Quantum Max Cut via the Algebraic Structure of Swap Operators. Quantum, 8:1352, May 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-05-22-1352.
Questions / Remarks / Feedback
X

Feedback for Dagstuhl Publishing


Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2025 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact