Document Open Access Logo

A Fast and Simple Algorithm for the Resource Constrained Shortest Path Problem

Authors Saman Ahmadi , Andrea Raith , Mahdi Jalili

PDF HTML 5

Files

Thumbnail PDF
PDF
LIPIcs.ESA.2025.97.pdf
  • Filesize: 1.03 MB
  • 15 pages
HTML5 Logo HTML (experimental)
LIPIcs.ESA.2025.97.html

Document Identifiers

Related Versions

Subject Classification

ACM Subject Classification
  • Computing methodologies → Search methodologies
  • Theory of computation → Shortest paths
Keywords
  • constrained pathfinding
  • shortest path problem
  • heuristic search

Metrics

Abstract

Constrained pathfinding is a classic yet challenging network optimization problem with broad applicability across many real-world domains. The Resource-Constrained Shortest Path (RCSP) problem focuses on finding cost-optimal paths that satisfy multiple resource constraints. In this paper, we propose a novel heuristic-guided search framework that accelerates constrained search in large-scale networks, including those with negative costs and resources, by leveraging efficient queuing and pruning strategies. Experimental results on real-world benchmark maps show that our framework achieves up to two orders of magnitude speedup over state-of-the-art methods, demonstrating its effectiveness in solving challenging RCSP instances within limited time.

Cite As Get BibTex

Saman Ahmadi, Andrea Raith, and Mahdi Jalili. A Fast and Simple Algorithm for the Resource Constrained Shortest Path Problem. In 33rd Annual European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA 2025). Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), Volume 351, pp. 97:1-97:15, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2025) https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2025.97

Author Details

Saman Ahmadi
  • School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
Andrea Raith
  • Department of Engineering Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand
Mahdi Jalili
  • School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

Funding

This research was supported by the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water under the International Clean Innovation Researcher Networks (ICIRN) program grant number ICIRN000077. Mahdi Jalili is supported by Australian Research Council through projects DP240100963, DP240100830, LP230100439 and IM240100042.

References

  1. Saman Ahmadi, Nathan R. Sturtevant, Daniel Harabor, and Mahdi Jalili. Exact multi-objective path finding with negative weights. In Sara Bernardini and Christian Muise, editors, Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS 2024, Banff, Alberta, Canada, June 1-6, 2024, pages 11-19. AAAI Press, 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1609/ICAPS.V34I1.31455.
  2. Saman Ahmadi, Guido Tack, Daniel Harabor, and Philip Kilby. Bi-objective search with bi-directional A*. In Petra Mutzel, Rasmus Pagh, and Grzegorz Herman, editors, 29th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms, ESA 2021, September 6-8, 2021, Lisbon, Portugal (Virtual Conference), volume 204 of LIPIcs, pages 3:1-3:15. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ESA.2021.3.
  3. Saman Ahmadi, Guido Tack, Daniel Harabor, and Philip Kilby. A fast exact algorithm for the resource constrained shortest path problem. In Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2021, Virtual Event, February 2-9, 2021, pages 12217-12224. AAAI Press, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1609/AAAI.V35I14.17450.
  4. Saman Ahmadi, Guido Tack, Daniel Harabor, and Philip Kilby. Vehicle dynamics in pickup-and-delivery problems using electric vehicles. In Laurent D. Michel, editor, 27th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, CP 2021, Montpellier, France (Virtual Conference), October 25-29, 2021, volume 210 of LIPIcs, pages 11:1-11:17. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CP.2021.11.
  5. Saman Ahmadi, Guido Tack, Daniel Harabor, and Philip Kilby. Weight constrained path finding with bidirectional A*. In Lukás Chrpa and Alessandro Saetti, editors, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Symposium on Combinatorial Search, SOCS 2022, Vienna, Austria, July 21-23, 2022, pages 2-10. AAAI Press, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1609/SOCS.V15I1.21746.
  6. Saman Ahmadi, Guido Tack, Daniel Harabor, Philip Kilby, and Mahdi Jalili. Enhanced methods for the weight constrained shortest path problem. Networks, 84(1):3-30, 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/net.22210.
  7. Saman Ahmadi, Guido Tack, Daniel Harabor, Philip Kilby, and Mahdi Jalili. Real-time energy-optimal path planning for electric vehicles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.12964, 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.12964.
  8. Richard Bellman. On a routing problem. Quarterly of applied mathematics, 16(1):87-90, 1958. Google Scholar
  9. Manuel A. Bolívar, Leonardo Lozano, and Andrés L. Medaglia. Acceleration strategies for the weight constrained shortest path problem with replenishment. Optim. Lett., 8(8):2155-2172, 2014. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-014-0742-x.
  10. Nicolás Cabrera, Andrés L. Medaglia, Leonardo Lozano, and Daniel Duque. An exact bidirectional pulse algorithm for the constrained shortest path. Networks, 76(2):128-146, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/net.21960.
  11. Edsger W. Dijkstra. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1:269-271, 1959. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01386390.
  12. Dominique Feillet, Pierre Dejax, Michel Gendreau, and Cyrille Gueguen. An exact algorithm for the elementary shortest path problem with resource constraints: Application to some vehicle routing problems. Networks, 44(3):216-229, 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/NET.20033.
  13. Daniele Ferone, Paola Festa, Serena Fugaro, and Tommaso Pastore. On the shortest path problems with edge constraints. In 22nd International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, ICTON 2020, Bari, Italy, July 19-23, 2020, pages 1-4. IEEE, 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTON51198.2020.9203378.
  14. Lester R Ford Jr. Network flow theory. Technical report, Rand Corp Santa Monica Ca, 1956. Google Scholar
  15. Bruce L. Golden and Douglas R. Shier. 2019–2020 glover-klingman prize winners. Networks, 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/net.22072.
  16. Gabriel Y. Handler and Israel Zang. A dual algorithm for the constrained shortest path problem. Networks, 10(4):293-309, 1980. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/net.3230100403.
  17. Peter E. Hart, Nils J. Nilsson, and Bertram Raphael. A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern., 4(2):100-107, 1968. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSC.1968.300136.
  18. Carlos Hernández, William Yeoh, Jorge A Baier, Ariel Felner, Oren Salzman, Han Zhang, Shao-Hung Chan, and Sven Koenig. Multi-objective search via lazy and efficient dominance checks. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 7223-7230, 2023. Google Scholar
  19. Gerhard Hiermann, Jakob Puchinger, Stefan Ropke, and Richard F. Hartl. The electric fleet size and mix vehicle routing problem with time windows and recharging stations. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 252(3):995-1018, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJOR.2016.01.038.
  20. Donald B Johnson. A note on dijkstra’s shortest path algorithm. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 20(3):385-388, 1973. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/321765.321768.
  21. Donald B. Johnson. Efficient algorithms for shortest paths in sparse networks. J. ACM, 24(1):1-13, 1977. URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/321992.321993.
  22. Leonardo Lozano and Andrés L. Medaglia. On an exact method for the constrained shortest path problem. Comput. Oper. Res., 40(1):378-384, 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2012.07.008.
  23. Edward F. Moore. The shortest path through a maze. In Proc. of the International Symposium on the Theory of Switching, pages 285-292. Harvard University Press, 1959. Google Scholar
  24. Keisuke Otaki, Tomosuke Maeda, Takayoshi Yoshimura, and Hiroyuki Sakai. Roaming navigation: Diverse constrained paths using heuristic search. IEEE Access, 11:75617-75627, 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3295830.
  25. Luigi Di Puglia Pugliese and Francesca Guerriero. A survey of resource constrained shortest path problems: Exact solution approaches. Networks, 62(3):183-200, 2013. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/net.21511.
  26. Francisco Javier Pulido, Lawrence Mandow, and José-Luis Pérez-de-la-Cruz. Dimensionality reduction in multiobjective shortest path search. Comput. Oper. Res., 64:60-70, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2015.05.007.
  27. Zhongqiang Ren, Zachary B Rubinstein, Stephen F Smith, Sivakumar Rathinam, and Howie Choset. ERCA*: A new approach for the resource constrained shortest path problem. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2023. Google Scholar
  28. Zhongqiang Ren, Richard Zhan, Sivakumar Rathinam, Maxim Likhachev, and Howie Choset. Enhanced multi-objective a* using balanced binary search trees. In Lukás Chrpa and Alessandro Saetti, editors, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Symposium on Combinatorial Search, SOCS 2022, Vienna, Austria, July 21-23, 2022, pages 162-170. AAAI Press, 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1609/SOCS.V15I1.21764.
  29. Giovanni Righini and Matteo Salani. Symmetry helps: Bounded bi-directional dynamic programming for the elementary shortest path problem with resource constraints. Discret. Optim., 3(3):255-273, 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.disopt.2006.05.007.
  30. Antonio Sedeño-Noda and Sergio Alonso-Rodríguez. An enhanced K-SP algorithm with pruning strategies to solve the constrained shortest path problem. Appl. Math. Comput., 265:602-618, 2015. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2015.05.109.
  31. Barrett W. Thomas, Tobia Calogiuri, and Mike Hewitt. An exact bidirectional A* approach for solving resource-constrained shortest path problems. Networks, 73(2):187-205, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/net.21856.
  32. Carlos Hernández Ulloa, William Yeoh, Jorge A. Baier, Han Zhang, Luis Suazo, and Sven Koenig. A simple and fast bi-objective search algorithm. In J. Christopher Beck, Olivier Buffet, Jörg Hoffmann, Erez Karpas, and Shirin Sohrabi, editors, Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, Nancy, France, October 26-30, 2020, pages 143-151. AAAI Press, 2020. URL: https://aaai.org/ojs/index.php/ICAPS/article/view/6655.
  33. Pieter Vansteenwegen, Wouter Souffriau, and Dirk Van Oudheusden. The orienteering problem: A survey. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 209(1):1-10, 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJOR.2010.03.045.
Any Issues?
X

Feedback on the Current Page

CAPTCHA

Thanks for your feedback!

Feedback submitted to Dagstuhl Publishing

Could not send message

Please try again later or send an E-mail
© 2023-2025 Schloss Dagstuhl – LZI GmbH About DROPS Imprint Privacy Contact